Who was the worse pick between Mitch Trubisky and Trey Lance?

Worse pick?

  • Mitch Trubisky

  • Trey Lance


Results are only viewable after voting.

duckbutta

eienaar van mans
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,887
Reputation
10,695
Daps
153,313
Reppin
DFW
Great question

Low key it might be Mitch just because the 49ers have still been super bowl contenders despite Lance not working out

With how Mahomes and even Watson have turned out, if Fields ends up being a bust, the Bears getting Trubisky may end up being a devastating move for the foreseeable future
IF he a bust?

He won 5 games in two years :pachaha:
 

prime

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2013
Messages
7,408
Reputation
1,219
Daps
19,501
Reppin
The heights
Damn this is actually tough I wanna say lance but no QB really popped yet behind him i think fields will this season but he hasn’t yet as for Mitch two QBs behind him made a all pro team and at deshaun Watson peak he is a all pro Qb and we already know what mahomes is but the 49ers gave up two first round picks and a 3rd while the bears gave up a 3rd and 4th to move up
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
38,355
Reputation
3,600
Daps
152,814
Great question

Low key it might be Mitch just because the 49ers have still been super bowl contenders despite Lance not working out

With how Mahomes and even Watson have turned out, if Fields ends up being a bust, the Bears getting Trubisky may end up being a devastating move for the foreseeable future
Hell, if anything that makes the 49ers choice WORSE.
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,570
Reputation
2,740
Daps
66,330
Reppin
The Yay
What kinda saves Lance is this though:

Of the QB's selected, the only one that's even debatable that they coulda went after was Fields. None of the other QB's became so good that the Niners guessed horribly wrong on QB. Could they have drafted Parsons and kept their assets and been fine? Sure, but then Jimmy G woulda still been the QB and Niners fans couldn't live with that. Niners fans were so done with Jimmy that management woulda made that trade for Zack fukking Wilson. Watson on the Bears maybe changes everything, including Watson's life.
so done with Jimmy we had to watch an entire year of him after...and another half a year the next year :francis:
 

Remy LeBreh

Linconia
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
6,288
Reputation
774
Daps
14,904
Reppin
CLB/CLE/ALB
Mitch. I am still tryna figure out what he did or what quality he possessed (aside from skin color of course) that made him worthy of that selection. And they coulda stayed at 3 and grabbed Jordan. Trey at least got potential and as good as the playera draftee after him are can you really justify trading 3 1sts for any of them?
He balled out against Stanford on national television, though I think it was still a loss and Solomon Thomas pushed his shyt in. At the time when Mitch was locked in he threw some nice darts, and he was mobile. I still think he could been decent to good if he didn't get stuck with Fox as a coach, no QB would have developed in Chicago at that time.
 

Remy LeBreh

Linconia
Joined
Aug 9, 2012
Messages
6,288
Reputation
774
Daps
14,904
Reppin
CLB/CLE/ALB
Mitch was starting just last season. Lance probably wasn't going to even on the otherwise loaded 9ers despite being healthy. Watson was the preferred pick with Mitch, and Fields should been selected instead of Trey. Bears gave up a ton just for one slot up, 9ers gave up a ton to jump up quite a bit.

In terms of draft positioning, the Bears is the worse pick. As a whole, I'd say the 9ers had a worse QB scenario collapse. Neither QB had the playtime worthy of their draft numbers, IMO.
Watson tanked the throwing mph test at the combine and that was a massive factor back then... anyone that threw under 55 mph was assumed to be a bust and Watson threw like 54
 

Brozay

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,692
Reputation
7,260
Daps
182,954
Mitch. I am still tryna figure out what he did or what quality he possessed (aside from skin color of course) that made him worthy of that selection. And they coulda stayed at 3 and grabbed Jordan. Trey at least got potential and as good as the playera draftee after him are can you really justify trading 3 1sts for any of them?
uhh Trey Lance played one season of Division 1 football
 

feelosofer

#ninergang
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
50,338
Reputation
8,065
Daps
145,460
Reppin
Brick City, NJ
I voted Mitch Trubisky but you know what the 49ers gave up way more and didn't even play him.

With that said Trey still has way more upside.
 

Regular_P

Just end the season.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
81,727
Reputation
10,392
Daps
219,238
Worse PICK was Trubisky, simply because Mahomes went after him and he's the best player in the NFL and probably will be for another decade.

The Trey Lance TRADE was worse. Chicago didn't give up nearly as much as Santa Clara did.
 
Top