Who Stops a ‘Bad Guy With a Gun’?

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
Explain what a "good guy" even is :comeon:. And how in the chaos of a shooting you'd be able to discern the assailant? You presume all these fools are dressed up like Bane or some shyt. If you had a gun and shots started flying how the fukk would you know if they're the active shooter? What if the "good guy" is returning fire but you don't realize they're trying to stop the actual "bad guy"? What a moronic strategy that is.

That shyt happened in the Gabby Giffords shooting - an unarmed civilian disarmed the shooter, then an armed "good guy with a gun" pulled a gun on the civilian hero and came within a millisecond of blowing him away. And somehow he was still portrayed as a hero on national news:




Heaven forbid you're a Black "good guy with a gun" and the cops show up:









Or there are all the "good guys with a gun" who shoot an innocent victim instead of the perp:








People with guns in general are so incompetent they can't even shoot an animal without hitting their friends or family instead:











Could include hundreds more like this.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
40,775
Reputation
6,192
Daps
108,028
Reppin
Birmingham, Alabama
I dont like framing it as good guy with a gun vs bad guy with a gun.
I think a better descriptor of who stops mass shootings is someone willing to die to prevent a mass shooting vs someone willing to die to cause a mass shooting.

The mass shooter usually wins these conflicts because the person trying to stop them does not want to die
....or is severely outgunned.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
40,775
Reputation
6,192
Daps
108,028
Reppin
Birmingham, Alabama
Would love to see some data on what happens to civilians(good guys with gun) who injure or kill innocent people and damage property during their attempt at stoping bad guy with gun


:patrice:
Would love to see the data on what happens in these scenarios when the good guys and bad guys basically wield the same weaponry. Good Guys with guns for the most part probably aren't stopping a Columbine or a Uvale. But they are also severely outgunned, which the media never takes into consideration. Me and my LCP 2 are just as fukked as anyone else when the assailant is wielding an M4 Carbine. Which is why this shyt is so disingenuous.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
46,154
Reputation
6,981
Daps
146,841
Reppin
CookoutGang
Would love to see the data on what happens in these scenarios when the good guys and bad guys basically wield the same weaponry. Good Guys with guns for the most part probably aren't stopping a Columbine or a Uvale. But they are also severely outgunned, which the media never takes into consideration. Me and my LCP 2 are just as fukked as anyone else when the assailant is wielding an M4 Carbine. Which is why this shyt is so disingenuous.
That's before we address the elephant in the room. Most armed folks are only looking to protect themselves and their loved ones.

They're not looking to engage a random shooter if they can escape safely themselves.
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
Would love to see the data on what happens in these scenarios when the good guys and bad guys basically wield the same weaponry. Good Guys with guns for the most part probably aren't stopping a Columbine or a Uvale. But they are also severely outgunned, which the media never takes into consideration. Me and my LCP 2 are just as fukked as anyone else when the assailant is wielding an M4 Carbine. Which is why this shyt is so disingenuous.


Sounds like you're making a strong case for an assault weapons ban. :skip:


But I can also see that the vast majority of the 20,000 gun homicides and 100,000 gun injuries each year are committed with far less powerful weapons. So with 400 million American guns already in circulation, the overall strategy of "arming good guys with guns to stop bad guys with guns" doesn't seem to be working. We have a higher homicide rate than any other Western nation, it feels disingenuous to assume that even more guns are suddenly going to crest that crucial inflection point and finally start making things better. All else being equal, states with fewer guns have fewer homicides.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
40,775
Reputation
6,192
Daps
108,028
Reppin
Birmingham, Alabama
Sounds like you're making a strong case for an assault weapons ban. :skip:


But I can also see that the vast majority of the 20,000 gun homicides and 100,000 gun injuries each year are committed with far less powerful weapons. So with 400 million American guns already in circulation, the overall strategy of "arming good guys with guns to stop bad guys with guns" doesn't seem to be working. We have a higher homicide rate than any other Western nation, it feels disingenuous to assume that even more guns are suddenly going to crest that crucial inflection point and finally start making things better. All else being equal, states with fewer guns have fewer homicides.
First of all that's bullshyt. Lets look at drunk drivers, no one on the planet would place the blame on sober drivers for preventing wrecks or fatalities caused by drunk drivers. So why is it up to "good guys" or basically responsible legal gun owners to stop "bad guys" with guns. When did that become our responsibility?
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
First of all that's bullshyt. Lets look at drunk drivers, no one on the planet would place the blame on sober drivers for preventing wrecks or fatalities caused by drunk drivers. So why is it up to "good guys" or basically responsible legal gun owners to stop "bad guys" with guns. When did that become our responsibility?


:dahell:


I'm not the one who expects "good guys with a gun" to prevent jack shyt, that's y'alls narrative. :mjlol:
 

Professor Emeritus

Veteran
Poster of the Year
Supporter
Joined
Jan 5, 2015
Messages
51,330
Reputation
19,691
Daps
203,913
Reppin
the ether
My narrative is why you wanna take guns away from legal law-abiding citizens because criminals kill people.


Law-abiding citizens, who aren't trying to use their guns to shoot other people, are not getting their guns taken away in our lifetime. Target practice and hunting and gun collecting are going to be lawful in the USA forever. There are more guns here than people, I own guns myself, though i don't keep them anywhere they might lead to any trouble.

The question is whether increasing the presence of guns in particularly volatile situations makes the public more or less safe. The question is whether gun rights extremists will continue to keep the country from passing even common-sense gun laws that could lower the # of shootings and # of guns in the hands of criminals. And the false claim that loading the country with "good guy guns" makes us all safer is one of the main narratives which keeps the public unsafe.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2013
Messages
40,775
Reputation
6,192
Daps
108,028
Reppin
Birmingham, Alabama
Law-abiding citizens, who aren't trying to use their guns to shoot other people, are not getting their guns taken away in our lifetime. Target practice and hunting and gun collecting are going to be lawful in the USA forever. There are more guns here than people, I own guns myself, though i don't keep them anywhere they might lead to any trouble.

The question is whether increasing the presence of guns in particularly volatile situations makes the public more or less safe. The question is whether gun rights extremists will continue to keep the country from passing even common-sense gun laws that could lower the # of shootings and # of guns in the hands of criminals. And the false claim that loading the country with "good guy guns" makes us all safer is one of the main narratives which keeps the public unsafe.

LOL, who brought up that narrative tho? That's what I'm saying. It ain't like legal gun owners came together and marched on the "Good guys" with guns ticket. or debate. Its usually brought up after a mass shooting by people who don't like guns.
 
Top