Who is the biggest Actor in Holywood?

Kilgore Trout

Banned
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
29,659
Reputation
-7,717
Daps
77,515
Reppin
Alabama
In the 90s I would have said Tom Cruise/Brad Pitt but now im not sure. I dont think we have mega stars like we used too.
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,883
Good question

brad pitt was popular and got alot of attention for his flicks but he wasnt a draw as such. The dudes that commanded box office units was cruise without a doubt. Costner had a bit of a run there and hanks..

Today that sort of money generator thats guaranteed to smash building each picture is all but extinct, now an actor latches on to a movie it does numbers everyone gets paid, it turns into a franchise and the perception the lead is a mega star starts taking shape. Then they do a movie outside the franchise that barely does anything box office wise. Perfect examples of this are RDJ and jennifer lawerence, its all smoke and mirrors.

Hollywood would have u believe its leo based on tenure and consistency, RDJ, just based on rich lists, or gosling/bradley cooper/channing tatum cuz they seem to be be the "it" boys attached to everything. But if I was going to choose i'd say the biggest "actor" in the business today is christian bale. Dude has played jesus, batman, john connor, moses and he got to call shaft a nig, he basically has the pick of the litter crosses between indie and mega studio projects. Aint like leo protecting his position by only working with named directors either
 
Last edited:

Majestic Pape

The-Coli = W SOHH = L
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
11,035
Reputation
523
Daps
12,842
It was Will Smith for many years, but not any longer I don't believe. There really isn't even a clear cut number one any more. The movie star seems to be dying out and is being replaced by the director or just the film itself (which isn't a bad thing). I guess Leo is as close to the top as you're going to get, but even he isn't really head and shoulders above the rest, and really is still looked at as more of a great actor than just big movie star, if that makes sense.

It was (really, still is) there for the taking for Dwayne though.
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,883
It was Will Smith for many years, but not any longer I don't believe. There really isn't even a clear cut number one any more. The movie star seems to be dying out and is being replaced by the director or just the film itself (which isn't a bad thing). I guess Leo is as close to the top as you're going to get, but even he isn't really head and shoulders above the rest, and really is still looked at as more of a great actor than just big movie star, if that makes sense.

It was (really, still is) there for the taking for Dwayne though.
I think the movie star & director is being replaced by the producer and studio exec. Back in the day a director had his/her own style today apart from a few cats here and there everyone is just following the same ish from a textbook. No one really has a distinct style any more even the old heads are forgoing their signature moves..Watched the american version of oldboy the other day and its like any director could've directed that. There was nothing in the execution that was spike lee-esque at all.

What have marc webb, josh whedon or james gunn really contributed to the blockbuster action genre yet here they are being giftwrapped dream directing assignments, its like execs are just looking for mailable directors that aint about to but their ego ahead of the project these days..
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,883
i think the whole dynamic has changed cause the smal screen is starting to surpass the silver screen
In what sense? the only thing I can see is that the line is now getting blurred and we are seeing the writing/production quality we get in movies on cable. But I fail to see how the small screen is in anyway surpassing the silver screen because of it. We will always have blockbusters like avengers, transformers e.t.c where nothing beats the cinema experience. Cable can have all the wires, sopranos, boardwalks and game of thrones but does that now mean studios are going to ceae production on critically acclaimed flicks like, 'cloud atlas' 'the master' 'the hours' or 'prisoners'

If the dynamics have changed its because you can pirate and watch shyt on bootleg, so execs are hesitant to throw money at anything that doesnt look like a safe bet. The boom that small screen is currently witnessing isnt affecting the movie biz at all, its just giving actors/writers more jobs and spoiling us as consumers
 
Last edited:

Notorious 1 E.Y.E.

Superstar
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
26,014
Reputation
1,807
Daps
52,267
Reppin
the low end. southside chi
In what sense? the only thing I can see is that the line is now getting blurred and we are seeing the writing/production quality we get in movies on cable. But I fail to see how the small screen is in anyway surpassing the silver screen because of it. We will always have blockbusters like avengers, transformers e.t.c where nothing beats the feeling or experience of seeing at a cinema. Cable can have all the wires, sopranos, boardwalks and game of thrones but does that now mean studios are going to stop making movies like, 'cloud atlas' 'the master' 'the hours' or 'prisoners'

If the dynamics have changed its because you can pirate and watch shyt on bootleg, so execs are hesitant to throw money at anything that doesnt look like a safe bet. The boom that small screen is currently witnessing isnt affecting the movie biz at all, its just giving actors/writers more jobs and spoiling us as consumers

didnt say that at all


all i say was the dynamci has changed


the tv stars are becoming bigger than the movie star

tv deals are better than they have ever been plus that syndication check
 

Roman Brady

Nobody Lives Forever
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
16,749
Reputation
-1,050
Daps
14,883
didnt say that at all


all i say was the dynamci has changed


the tv stars are becoming bigger than the movie star
well in todays climate there really isnt a "movie star" and most of the washed up stars of yesterday are on tv. so there are hidden variables to that statement. Just for argument sake tho who are these tv stars (not even going to make the distinction between tv and cable) that are bigger than movie stars? I mean in todays society a no name on some reality tv show can have his 15 minutes gaining more notoriety than obba babatunde whole career :yeshrug:


everyone seem to go do la li over breaking bad and how the 2 leads were this that and the other. On the surface one would say they were pretty popular right? well they placed the younger lead in a fast and furious lite actioner this summer how did it do?

tv deals are better than they have ever been plus that syndication check
thats the business side of things that fattening someone pockets not ours, when you make a statement like small screen is surpassing the silver screen I imagine you are speaking as a consumer not a hollywood accountant, no?
 
Top