Kilgore Trout
Banned
In the 90s I would have said Tom Cruise/Brad Pitt but now im not sure. I dont think we have mega stars like we used too.
Leo
Robert Downey jr
Brad Pitt
In that order
as @Roman Brady said, the movie star is dead.. everything is catered on the franchise
it's a shame really.
i seem to follow directors now. but i also do check for every single thing dicaprio does.
I think the movie star & director is being replaced by the producer and studio exec. Back in the day a director had his/her own style today apart from a few cats here and there everyone is just following the same ish from a textbook. No one really has a distinct style any more even the old heads are forgoing their signature moves..Watched the american version of oldboy the other day and its like any director could've directed that. There was nothing in the execution that was spike lee-esque at all.It was Will Smith for many years, but not any longer I don't believe. There really isn't even a clear cut number one any more. The movie star seems to be dying out and is being replaced by the director or just the film itself (which isn't a bad thing). I guess Leo is as close to the top as you're going to get, but even he isn't really head and shoulders above the rest, and really is still looked at as more of a great actor than just big movie star, if that makes sense.
It was (really, still is) there for the taking for Dwayne though.
In what sense? the only thing I can see is that the line is now getting blurred and we are seeing the writing/production quality we get in movies on cable. But I fail to see how the small screen is in anyway surpassing the silver screen because of it. We will always have blockbusters like avengers, transformers e.t.c where nothing beats the cinema experience. Cable can have all the wires, sopranos, boardwalks and game of thrones but does that now mean studios are going to ceae production on critically acclaimed flicks like, 'cloud atlas' 'the master' 'the hours' or 'prisoners'i think the whole dynamic has changed cause the smal screen is starting to surpass the silver screen
This is certainly a big part of it.i think the whole dynamic has changed cause the smal screen is starting to surpass the silver screen
In what sense? the only thing I can see is that the line is now getting blurred and we are seeing the writing/production quality we get in movies on cable. But I fail to see how the small screen is in anyway surpassing the silver screen because of it. We will always have blockbusters like avengers, transformers e.t.c where nothing beats the feeling or experience of seeing at a cinema. Cable can have all the wires, sopranos, boardwalks and game of thrones but does that now mean studios are going to stop making movies like, 'cloud atlas' 'the master' 'the hours' or 'prisoners'
If the dynamics have changed its because you can pirate and watch shyt on bootleg, so execs are hesitant to throw money at anything that doesnt look like a safe bet. The boom that small screen is currently witnessing isnt affecting the movie biz at all, its just giving actors/writers more jobs and spoiling us as consumers
well in todays climate there really isnt a "movie star" and most of the washed up stars of yesterday are on tv. so there are hidden variables to that statement. Just for argument sake tho who are these tv stars (not even going to make the distinction between tv and cable) that are bigger than movie stars? I mean in todays society a no name on some reality tv show can have his 15 minutes gaining more notoriety than obba babatunde whole careerdidnt say that at all
all i say was the dynamci has changed
the tv stars are becoming bigger than the movie star
thats the business side of things that fattening someone pockets not ours, when you make a statement like small screen is surpassing the silver screen I imagine you are speaking as a consumer not a hollywood accountant, no?tv deals are better than they have ever been plus that syndication check