ISO
Pass me the rock nikka
Has a poor reputation as a team guy and defensive player.Why don't we sign Christian Wood?
Has a poor reputation as a team guy and defensive player.Why don't we sign Christian Wood?
What are the pros/cons of extending Immanuel Quickley? Is it likely he’s moved at the trade deadline, and if so, for what? — Matthew H.
Quickley is eligible to receive an extension right now. He has until the day before the regular season begins to sign one. Other first-round picks from the 2020 NBA Draft have signed their rookie-scale extensions already; Anthony Edwards, LaMelo Ball and Tyrese Haliburton are the big names. But Quickley waits, along with the other non-max guys from his class.
Once Quickley signs an extension, he becomes difficult to trade. Pay attention because this is one of those CBA rules that is needlessly complicated. Or, you know, just skip over the next paragraph if you don’t want to think. It’s July, warm and the sun is shining. And thinking is the last thing any of us need right now.
But for those of us sitting inside and pondering about rookie extensions, here’s the problem with trading Quickey after giving him a new contract. If the Knicks extended Quickley and then traded him, his outgoing salary would be his 2023-24 salary: $4.2 million. But his incoming salary would be the average of his 2023-24 salary and each year of the extension.
For example, let’s say Quickley were to sign a four-year, $80 million extension, which would kick in for the 2024-25 season, and then the team decided to trade him while he was still making his $4.2 million salary. That would mean his outgoing salary is $4.2 million but his incoming salary for whichever team is receiving him would be the average of $84.2 million over five years: $16.8 million — which would make matching salaries no easy task.
The easiest way to pull off a trade in this scenario would be to find a third team or to pile up tons of salary in the deal. But those are difficult steps to pull off. And that means it’s only prudent to hold back on a Quickley extension until the October deadline nears — just in case a big-time trade pops up, and the Knicks need to include Quickley in it.
As I reported in June, they dangled Quickley in trades for prime-aged players earlier in the summer.
Or maybe a trade for a star emerges. The flashiest part of the offseason may be behind us, but this is how the NBA works. When the basketball world is at its quietest, that’s when a superstar says he wants out.
Remember, the Knicks are not treating the Quickley market the same way they did in November when they considered flipping the 24-year-old guard for a good first-round pick. He became too important to them this past season, even after his playoff struggles. So I would say the most likely scenario (and this is opinion; not reporting) is that Quickley begins the season with the Knicks. And if he begins the season with the Knicks, I could see an extension coming. (Again, opinion — not reporting.)
I wrote a story earlier in the summer about what could be a fair contract for him. A poll of 15 front-office officials landed in the realm of $16 million to $20 million a year in average annual value.
This isn’t the same as the situation in Philadelphia with Tyrese Maxey, who was in the same draft class as Quickley and probably won’t receive an extension, this summer in part because the 76ers may use cap space next July. Maxey’s cap hold (the amount of money that counts against their books when he is a free agent) is much smaller than his salary would be in an extension — meaning that if they wait until 2024 to pay him, they can have more cap room next summer.
But the Knicks won’t have cap room next year, regardless, so that concept doesn’t come into play.
If they and Quickley don’t agree to an extension, that’s when the questions come about their future together. But it also doesn’t mean their relationship is over. Quickley would be a restricted free agent in 2024, meaning the Knicks could match any offer sheet he signs elsewhere to bring him back for the same price.
What would be the theoretical clock on making a star trade for the Knicks? With Quickley’s possible extension looming, Evan Fournier’s expiring contract due to come off the books after the season and a chest of Knicks picks that are devalued/protected picks that don’t have much value to begin with, what if the ideal time to trade assets runs out before a trade materializes? — Alexandra G.
This is the paradox of the Knicks’ strategy: Patience is a virtue but aggression is no sin. And with the way the team is built, along with some of the rules in the new collective bargaining agreement, it could be easier to pull off a trade for a star today than it would be a year from now or later.
Fournier’s $19 million comes off the books after this season. His contract would be essential to match salaries with another team. Meanwhile, the draft picks the Knicks have from other teams could lessen come next summer. New York views those picks as currency as much as it views them as ways to find young players. But the Dallas Mavericks probably won’t finish with a bottom-10 record again, which means the pick would convey in 2024, which means one less first-rounder the Knicks have to trade come July. The 2024 Washington Wizards pick, because it is heavily protected and because the Wizards are entering tank mode, may never convey at all.
There also are the new rules in the new CBA, which came into effect less than a month ago, that could encourage a trade sooner rather than later. A team used to be able to take in 125 percent of the salary it was sending out in a trade. Now, if that team is $7 million above the luxury tax (referred to as “the first apron”) it can take in only 110 percent. But that’s just for this season. Starting next season, the number drops to 100 percent, meaning that any team above the first apron cannot take in more money than it sends out in trades.
Many of the squads with fantastic players on max contracts just so happen to be above the first apron. Trading for those teams’ stars is more complicated this season than it was last season and it will be even more of a headache once 2024-25 begins.
Now seems to be the ideal time to make a star trade for the Knicks. Quickley is young and cheap. Barrett still has four years remaining on his contract, and he’s coming off an encouraging playoff run. Quentin Grimes is still a year away from extension eligibility. They have all those draft picks.
But there’s one thing missing: the star is not there.
It’s not like the Knicks would benefit from offering some ginormous package for a player who is not worth it. They are best waiting on a top-10 player, a first-team All-NBAer or whatever you want to call it. And right now, there doesn’t seem to be one available.
But this is the NBA. Drama blasts onto the scene quickly here. No one can predict how Joel Embiid might feel in a few months or if the Phoenix Suns will crash and burn, enough so that they need to trade one of their main guys or if some other great player declares he wants out.
So the Knicks are waiting, even though the best-case scenario for them would be one of those A-listers putting himself on the market today.
Not gonna lie, RJ looks more confident and competent in those videos than before. Y'all might have 1 this year with him.
Jalen Brunson hit the game winning three on a four point play during team USA scrimmage.
League is finished