ISO
Pass me the rock nikka
So yes 2 seconds that is fair market valueYeah, my bad. It's two seconds. The worst between the Suns and Pacers in '28 and the worst between the Wiz and Pacers in '29.
The rumors about a first-round pick for Obi piled up in the leadup to the trade deadline this year. At the time, it seemed like there was disagreement over which pick would convey. This is around the time talks started, and they continued right to the deadline.
It wouldn't have to be a big difference to fit the simple statement: The Knicks hang on to assets past their peak value. It's insignificant alone, but there's a pattern. They hang on to middling assets, the assets get more and more exposed and devalued, and then they can barely give the pieces away. Noel, Burks, Obi, and Rose all had value at one point. But the Knicks held on to them until they didn't anymore.
To put it in other words, this FO seems to get attached to its assets unless they demand out. That applies to the Mitchell trade talks, to the middling (or worse) pieces that they wound up having to dump, and resigning players like RJ (your least favorite FO move) and Mitch Robinson. They expect more than they can get for assets and refuse to cut their losses unless they absolutely must.
The article says the Knicks wanted one of Indy’s first round picks for Toppin and that first round pick was going to be trade bait for a star given the trade never occurred when they were shopping him while he was injured it’s safe to say Indiana wasn’t willing to give that up