White People Respond to Putin opening the Vault of black biblical images

[Everythingg]

What they DON'T Do is Talk about GERMANIC HISTORY, that is their TRUE HISTORY.

There were black Germans tho:

Both of these are from Germany with the first being from the 1400s and the second guy holding the crest of the Hapsburgs who ruled over different countries in Europe…

 

[that guy]

The video is discolored and there is evidence of European paintings being discolored. Either way, historical art isn't a good way to tell what certain groups of people looked like, European artists have been known to depict Genghis Khan as a white man.

The video isn’t discolored, the actual painting is darker than the video:

Image Not-made-by-hands - OrthodoxWiki

orthodoxwiki.org

Historical art is the most accurate way to tell what someone looked like as long as the artwork is contemporaneous to the person it’s depicting. We know the ancient Egyptians are black for example because of how they depicted themselves and they were very accurate and highly detailed. Look at this bust from king tut for example:



The best method is a combination of contemporaneous artwork AND physical descriptions. You’re partially correct though in that Europeans depict everyone as white. That’s why we should never take Europeans on their word when it comes to history.

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

Ignore cacs whitewashing black spiritual beliefs because of your ego brehs

if that makes you find better. Still myths no matter the color of the people's skin.

 

[3rdWorld]

Only a c00n and weakling cares what Cacs think at this point..

 

[8WON6]

"Russia lost a fan promoting this woke DEI Bible crap"

 

[Everythingg]

if that makes you find better.

Why wouldn’t understanding the truth of who actually did what make me feel better over cacs lying/hiding what black people actually did in the past and claiming it as their own?

 

[that guy]

I will definitely watch that longer video you linked, but the examples in the TikTok are literally scans of discolored paintings.

What you wrote here is a lot more interesting.


There just isn't enough evidence to support something like this, no matter how much whitewashing, the evidence would be irrefutable and extend beyond paintings and tapestries.

The paintings are not discolored how many paintings do you want me to post?

St Peter (Grabow) Altarpiece: Creation of the Animals by MASTER Bertram

Look at the deliberate coloration of the animals such as the rabbit where the underbelly is a lighter color than the rest of the body. There is no discoloration. Russian orthodox churches depicted biblical figures as black just like Europeans did until they developed racial used constructs.

The evidence is in the video, in the book he shows, out of about 140 European family coat of arms, there are just as many if not more black families as there are white families. And he didn’t even include the cost of arms that depicted people of different colors who one could obviously tell are black people by the nose and lips.

 

[BobbyWojak]

The video isn’t discolored, the actual painting is darker than the video:

The video is literally discolored when put side by side to the original video, it's not up for debate. You mean his skin is more brown in high-res scans of the painting, which isn't proof of him being depicted as Black or African.

Historical art is the most accurate way to tell what someone looked like as long as the artwork is contemporaneous to the person it’s depicting. We know the ancient Egyptians are black for example because of how they depicted themselves and they were very accurate and highly detailed. Look at this bust from king tut for example:

The best method is a combination of contemporaneous artwork AND physical descriptions. You’re partially correct though in that Europeans depict everyone as white. That’s why we should never take Europeans on their word when it comes to history.

Your best method is still unreliable and leaves room for debate; the safest bet is saying that Moors and Egyptians were diverse groups with sizeable percentages of Black people (obviously).

St Peter (Grabow) Altarpiece: Creation of the Animals by MASTER Bertram

Look at the deliberate coloration of the animals such as the rabbit where the underbelly is a lighter color than the rest of the body. There is no discoloration. Russian orthodox churches depicted biblical figures as black just like Europeans did until they developed racial used constructs.

terrible example, even if we took this at face value his features aren't decidedly Black

full painting 4k scan

 

[BobbyWojak]

@that guy I guess the laughing emojis come out once we start posting high-res scans

 

[TEH]

Coli c00ns are punching the air right now

 

[2 Up 2 Down]

Why wouldn’t understanding the truth of who actually did what make me feel better over cacs lying/hiding what black people actually did in the past and claiming it as their own?

If you going by the canonical bible we have today was filtered by numerous scribes with each editing and changing parts with each copy, more changes were made when the church was also editing what goes in the Bible. Many of those people were not black if at all.

As I mentioned before it is all myths anyone

 

[that guy]

The video is literally discolored when put side by side to the original video, it's not up for debate. You mean his skin is more brown in high-res scans of the painting, which isn't proof of him being depicted as Black or African.



Your best method is still unreliable and leaves room for debate; the safest bet is saying that Moors and Egyptians were diverse groups with sizeable percentages of Black people (obviously).

terrible example, even if we took this at face value his features aren't decidedly Black

full painting 4k scan

Look at the painting you posted (which is lightened) look at the top right painting, notice how the white person is depicted with white skin with pink undertones while the other has brown undertones.

When you say “his features arent black” that’s when you sound unlearned. There is no such thing as a feature that is nonblack. Black phenotypes encompass all phenotypes on earth.

Here another one:

The Metropolitan Peter of Moscow with Scenes from His Life, 1480s.

Buy The Metropolitan Peter of Moscow with Scenes from His Life, 1480s. by Dionysius as fine art print. ✓ Perfect reproduction ✓ Top quality

www.meisterdrucke.us

Let me guess his skin is discolored but somehow his all white attire isn’t

 

[that guy]

The video is literally discolored when put side by side to the original video, it's not up for debate. You mean his skin is more brown in high-res scans of the painting, which isn't proof of him being depicted as Black or African.



Your best method is still unreliable and leaves room for debate; the safest bet is saying that Moors and Egyptians were diverse groups with sizeable percentages of Black people (obviously).

terrible example, even if we took this at face value his features aren't decidedly Black

full painting 4k scan

Also, in addition to my last post, these paintings look exactly like Ethiopian depictions in their bibles:

Amharic Bible dating back to the 17th century in an Ethiopian...

Amharic Bible dating back to the 17th century in an Ethiopian monastery of the Old Town of Jerusalem, Israel.

www.gettyimages.com

Lighter skin, but with brown undertones to still depict that they’re black.

 

[3rdWorld]

For maximum cac tears effect, Putin was the best man to release this.
Putin is the current darling of America's far right maga nazi occult..this won't go down well with them

Been saying for the longest time these western Christians need a good dose of truth to fukk their whole minds up.

 

[that guy]

@that guy I guess the laughing emojis come out once we start posting high-res scans

I was laughing when you said “nonblack” features. That’s a white supremacist talking point that fails to understand the variance of black phenotypes. You can find every phenotype under the sun in Africa alone let alone indigenous populations outside of Africa.