stealthbomber
cruising at 30,000
anyone not saying christianity is purely uneducated
Which Religion Has The Highest Body Count?
- Thread starter bogey_j
- Start date
It depends how you're looking it at. If all deaths at the hands of Christians are counted then I would agree, but if we're only counting deaths that were motivated strictly by religion then I wouldn't.
stealthbomber
cruising at 30,000
i guess... i think it was you who had a good point about religion being a mask for economic gain, but that was only at the highest levels of govt and we know that looking back on it. the warriors were fighting out of religious belief.
Broke Wave
The GOAT
Are you fukking kidding me?
@Type Username Here as a brasileiros how do you feel about the aforementioned statements? Accurate?
I've been studying history for a long time, and hold several degrees.Are you fukking kidding me?
@Type Username Here as a brasileiros how do you feel about the aforementioned statements? Accurate?
What is it that you find so crazy?
Broke Wave
The GOAT
It's hilarious that you can write off the Crusades as being politically and economically motivated, totally devoid of religious intent, then hide behind your degrees as some kind of shade from the most obvious criticisms in the world.
If you want to use that flimsy ass defense of Christian slaughters over history, then even Al Qaeda and 9/11 are totally excused from the realm of Islamic violence. Al Qaeda has much greater geopolitical goals which involve the Gulf and a whole host of factors, I exclude them from Islamic violence. In fact, I can exclude the Indian "conflict" and simply say that there are class and ethnic divides which are being exacerbated by religious tensions.
WEAK
Aside from the First Crusade, the European Crusading Armies lost consistently. Yeah, the first sack of Jerusalem was horrific, but several religions have been responsible for the sacking of cities. I'm not sure that that one event would overwhelmingly win the debate.
Also, that was hardly my point. I'm not sure why you decided to focus on that. The extinction of the Native American population would be the much larger bloodletting at the hands of Christians. My point was that wasn't a religious crusade; its perpetrators just happened to be Christian. To me, thats not the fault of the religion, especially when the only critics of the awful treatment of the natives were Christian office holders. If you disagree that's fine.
Not hiding behind degrees or pushing an agenda, just having a discussion.
GetInTheTruck
Member
Sounds like you just dont like hearing the truth, and it makes you uncomfortable. Still, you should STFU.
Well said.
GetInTheTruck
Member
Word. Islam would never get that kind of pass, but this clown is making all kinds of excuses for Christians. fukk outta here
Bondye Vodou
Proud practitioner of the "High Science"
That nikka was a catholic
demonic
That nikka was a catholic
demonic
You should pay attention to your own links. He was Orthodox.
And, despite his brutality, he was only defending his homeland against Ottoman invaders. Who's to blame there?
With a 'stache like that i dont know how they aint see this cat coming and snuff him out before he went full retard
That nikka was a catholic
demonic
Bondye Vodou
Proud practitioner of the "High Science"
fixedIt's a tight one between Christianity and them muslim c00ns
I'd say the devilish Christians just edge into the lead.