Giannis is great but I’m not sure how you can conclude anything from this finals run. He missed crucial games in the conference finals and his team still advanced. His opponent in the semifinals were missing 2 of their 3 best players and the Bucks were literally inches away from losing.
This is one of those weird years where it’s hard to give any specific player a boost for winning the championship. Is Devin Booker a top 10 player in the league if he wins finals MVP? I don’t think so. Adding a finals MVP will be great for Giannis’ resume but it’s hard for me to see him leapfrogging greats when you contextualize this run.
U not applying context...
The games he missed Trae Young was either out or very hobbled. Young is the Hawks offensive engine. Milwaukee is a good enough team without Giannis to handle them. The Bucks were going to win that series regardless they are better and more experienced.
The Nets were a stacked team. Even without Kyrie (he played most the series) and a 60% Harden, they still had KD playing the best basketball of his career with max usage, and the Nets have a good cast of role players as well. I also don’t buy that Bucks would just roll over if everyone was healthy. The Nets may
never make it through 82 games and a Finals run fully healthy with this core.
Throughout history shyt like this has happened in the playoffs where is the context when other historical players are discussed?
Do y’all want parity or not? This was the year with the most parity since 2011.