When did liberals become so hawkishly pro war and genocide. I swear it wasn't only leftist and hippies opposing the vietnam war in the 60's

Osmosis

Superstar
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
20,908
Reputation
3,103
Daps
56,452
Clinton-Trump

Clinton was on her world police shyt and Trump went the opposite way during the debates/campaign and nikkas refused to be on the same side with trump on anything so they mocked him for it .


It’s becoming obvious at this point that as long as a person has a D by his/her name they can say almost anything and get support for it ..voters have very few
issues they really stand on
Hillary and Trump had similar foreign policy so there were no sides to be taken. For several years, both parties have been in defense of Israel’s right–wing genocidal government, advocate for high military spending, and in support for allied dictatorships. The Republicans are more militaristic/hawkish but non-progressive dems are trending that way.
 

The_Sheff

A Thick Sauce N*gga
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,083
Reputation
5,111
Daps
119,666
Reppin
ATL to MEM
Because being anti-war when one side is “white” is a losing proposition and at the end of the day they want to win and get elected.

Pretty simple.
 

Damnshow

Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
19,084
Reputation
5,100
Daps
83,903
I'm all for spending less and protecting other countries less European or not. Is America tho?
All I was saying is Germany is our ally, they built a pipeline with Russia and we destroyed it. Thus, hurting an ally. Why did they have to become " less energy dependable on russians"? Because we said so? I guess they aren't the allies we hoped they would be but the relationship has to continue nonetheless. Doesn't sound like a healthy relationship.
Germany has to be less dependable on russia because the more money goes to russia, the more russia will bully Europe. Just because the bombs won't fly to Berlin doesn't mean that Europe will be a safe place. Russia's plan is to make Europe as chaotic as possible and then make their move. Germany would be safe, while countries like Poland won't and that will be enough to cause huge chaos inside Europe. Over the last 30 years, the safest situation between russia and the west was 90s to early 00s when russians were too damn poor to start any kind of war, besides some local war conflicts in their own country.

America is not the only country that was critical of nord stream. Several European Union nations from east and central did not agree with that project. They were just too quiet about it while America was the loudest.
 

FukkaPaidEmail

Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
23,409
Reputation
4,228
Daps
90,315
Reppin
The Diaspora
Hillary and Trump had similar foreign policy so there were no sides to be taken. For several years, both parties have been in defense of Israel’s right–wing genocidal government, advocate for high military spending, and in support for allied dictatorships. The Republicans are more militaristic/hawkish but non-progressive dems are trending that way.
Nah during the debates/campaign Hillary was 1000% more militaristic than trump

They painted him as a isolationist and with MAGA and America First was kinda easy with her standing in front of him

That’s why they tried to get the Donald The Dove shyt off …which they’re doing again
 
Last edited:

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
31,560
Reputation
3,248
Daps
71,864
Reppin
New York
Germany has to be less dependable on russia because the more money goes to russia, the more russia will bully Europe. Just because the bombs won't fly to Berlin doesn't mean that Europe will be a safe place. Russia's plan is to make Europe as chaotic as possible and then make their move. Germany would be safe, while countries like Poland won't and that will be enough to cause huge chaos inside Europe. Over the last 30 years, the safest situation between russia and the west was 90s to early 00s when russians were too damn poor to start any kind of war, besides some local war conflicts in their own country.

America is not the only country that was critical of nord stream. Several European Union nations from east and central did not agree with that project. They were just too quiet about it while America was the loudest.
"I don't agree with what a foreign country is doing pipeline wise so let's destroy it." We would never tolerate such an attitude towards us. Why you think Germany should is weird. I think being quiet about it or offering a better alternative is more rational.
Why would Germany be worried about any other place other than Germany? Especially if they are in partnership with Russia on the pipeline?
You are very familiar about how America thinks about these issues but not how other countries might feel.
 

Damnshow

Veteran
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
19,084
Reputation
5,100
Daps
83,903
"I don't agree with what a foreign country is doing pipeline wise so let's destroy it." We would never tolerate such an attitude towards us. Why you think Germany should is weird. I think being quiet about it or offering a better alternative is more rational.
Why would Germany be worried about any other place other than Germany? Especially if they are in partnership with Russia on the pipeline?
You are very familiar about how America thinks about these issues but not how other countries might feel.
Are you 100% sure it's America who blew up those pipelines? If there is an undeniable truth that Americans blew up those things then yeah that sounds like a very drastic move they did.

Why would Germany worry about any other place other than Germany? Because they are in European Union and in NATO, which means they are not a lone wolf who does whatever they want for their country. This is same mindset MAGA has: "fukk those other countries. what about me"

Germans sending billions of dollars to russia which puts Eastern Europe in danger, which means European Union becoming chaotic than it already is. Which means costing partnership with other countries because they no longer trust you that much.
 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
24,950
Reputation
6,679
Daps
89,646
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
If it fits the agenda, a liberal will go to war.

No where in the liberal playbook does it say they are inherently anti-war.
 

Georgiamuscle

Superstar
Joined
Oct 14, 2015
Messages
7,859
Reputation
6,552
Daps
30,308
Reppin
Rise up!
Are you 100% sure it's America who blew up those pipelines? If there is an undeniable truth that Americans blew up those things then yeah that sounds like a very drastic move they did.

Why would Germany worry about any other place other than Germany? Because they are in European Union and in NATO, which means they are not a lone wolf who does whatever they want for their country. This is same mindset MAGA has: "fukk those other countries. what about me"

Germans sending billions of dollars to russia which puts Eastern Europe in danger, which means European Union becoming chaotic than it already is. Which means costing partnership with other countries because they no longer trust you that much.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...itary officer,details of the covert operation.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
31,560
Reputation
3,248
Daps
71,864
Reppin
New York
Are you 100% sure it's America who blew up those pipelines? If there is an undeniable truth that Americans blew up those things then yeah that sounds like a very drastic move they did.

Why would Germany worry about any other place other than Germany? Because they are in European Union and in NATO, which means they are not a lone wolf who does whatever they want for their country. This is same mindset MAGA has: "fukk those other countries. what about me"

Germans sending billions of dollars to russia which puts Eastern Europe in danger, which means European Union becoming chaotic than it already is. Which means costing partnership with other countries because they no longer trust you that much.
Who do you think blew it up if not us?
Aren't your 2nd and 3rd paragraphs contradicting each other? Germany can't act autonomously because of NATO and then admit they acted autonomously and hurt the European Union with Nord Stream. So I guess they can act autonomously.
 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
24,950
Reputation
6,679
Daps
89,646
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
Are you 100% sure it's America who blew up those pipelines? If there is an undeniable truth that Americans blew up those things then yeah that sounds like a very drastic move they did.

Why would Germany worry about any other place other than Germany? Because they are in European Union and in NATO, which means they are not a lone wolf who does whatever they want for their country. This is same mindset MAGA has: "fukk those other countries. what about me"

Germans sending billions of dollars to russia which puts Eastern Europe in danger, which means European Union becoming chaotic than it already is. Which means costing partnership with other countries because they no longer trust you that much.
I don't believe it was America who destroyed the pipeline either, but Germany is a curious case because there are still many existing relationships prior to the Berlin Wall coming down. Not saying Germany had a favorable view of Soviet occupation, but just because the Wall came down doesn't mean all of those business/political ties went away. Its only been 30 some odd years, some folks got rich when it came down in their 20s and 30s and are only in their 60s. Gerhard Schroeder for instance Benefited greatly from his relationships with Russia.

The real problem I see here is America military hegemony was used to form allegiances as a new world order arose, and those allegiances were strengthened because America became Europe's big brother, it allowed Europe to focus on economic development rather than military development, and because there really was only 1 big dog as a military power (its apparent now USSR was only a ballistic and tank power), most wars between major powers ceased.

It really was a genius strategy, but the US got a little power drunk after 9/11 and the cards started to fall.
 

mbewane

Knicks: 93 til infinity
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
18,928
Reputation
4,038
Daps
54,148
Reppin
Brussels, Belgium
The US is literally built on colonization, genocide and slavery. That's where the country comes from. So of course they gonna support another country born in the same way. Palestine is always the litmus test in the West for these kind of things because it's literally old school european/western colonialism unfolding under our eyes mixed with pure hatred for Arabs/Muslims. That's why you have all kinds of people who supposedly are "liberals/anti-racist/decolonial" and all that good stuff show their true colours. And that goes, no pun intended, for people of all colours. You have people who talk all day about freedom and against white supremacy suddenly have no problem supporting a full on genocide, because deep down they themselves either have an imperialist/colonial mindset and/or support white supremacy and/or hate Arabs/Muslims.
 

Jalether

Superstar
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,013
Reputation
2,055
Daps
40,818
Liberals today talk about women’s rights then in the same sentence are supporting pro rape Hamas
You might want to seat this one out. You are simping for rapist and rape culture:scust:






 
Top