give them time. 20 years ago these places were non-factorsThey are underperforming given their advantages in population and manufacturing cost.
give them time. 20 years ago these places were non-factorsThey are underperforming given their advantages in population and manufacturing cost.
we don't have to bring all the jobs back. We just need ENOUGH.It's hilarious because the poorest in this country aren't living in mud huts with holes for bathrooms that they don't deserve better and should learn their place. shytting on the worst off instead of acknowledging the complete distribution of wealth to the top classes over the past 30 years. Instead of tackling that issue you want those same people to decide what to pay their employees and dictate to them a social contract just above indentured servitude.
What you don't understand is we are living your idea out right now. The worker in America has no say. You think killing the wage floor will bring jobs back but it will make them send more jobs overseas. Because once you tell them they can pay whatever they'll pull benefits, sick and maternity leave, retirement plans etc. And once the "spoiled" American worker complains about that the companies will just move back overseas where they're not regulated to care about all that. So then the American worker will look to the government for support for those benefits they lost and congratulations you've created an even bigger welfare state.
Only in America do they bytch about labor opportunities without doing anything to compete for those jobsNapoleon is one of the only posters I genuinely believe is stupid. Most people just troll but he just doesn't seem like a very intelligent human being. Sad.
Those increases are still lower than American wages.Anyone else notice nap has two separate links to my post about the USSR in his sig lmao what an own
Also since nap doesn't want to acknowledge that he doesn't know anything about Chinese wages:
Do any of you even know how low wages would be if you just had to lower them without touching environmental regs and safety? Smdh did no one listen to Rick santorums stump speech?
You're advocating for the richest country ever to sanction poverty wage work with no benefits to compete against a country with a much lower cost of living.we don't have to bring all the jobs back. We just need ENOUGH.
The US can easily compete if it wants to.
The american worker has to be willing to do so.
dap & rep, especially the bolded.You're advocating for the richest country ever to sanction poverty wage work with no benefits to compete against a country with a much lower cost of living.
Cool, then you have to accept that it will dramatically increase the welfare state. Or you're just saying enough jobs to help some statistic that doesn't matter.
Either way it's the stupidest shyt I've ever heard, peace
Those increases are still lower than American wages.
Also, its a fallacy to assert that environmental regs and safety is intrinsically tied to wages in developing countries.
Stop it.
3x a little is still a little."They haven't increased much!"
The average wage has tripled in the last decade
"Well the wages are still lower!"
No shyt retard and guess what? They have much lower living standards in China still. Despite having "all the jobs"
Workplace safety and environmental regulations are basically intrinsically tied to wages. There's no example of nations with high wages and low safety standards or the inverse.
Stop
Being
A
Dumb
bytch
Nap
Chinese wages haven't been increasing that much. Stop lying.
.
3x a little is still a little.
Why aren't you posting the NBER articles that debunk your stance?Moving those goalposts
Once again, you get it.More (non-black) people will resort to entitlements, crime, and prostitution.
Eventually we will have to legalize drugs and prostitution as a service industry for peopletoo stupidunable to work in the service industry.
Haha jk
We will keep drugs and prostitution illegal and open up a bunch of FEMA camps to house all the criminals that police will be rounding up. Because when people cannot get jobs, they either turn to crime or entitlements.
And the government will have to raise taxes or outright nationalizeallcertain industries to fund entitlements, which will result in a lot more people needing entitlements lol.
And as the Illuminati has shown with black people as the canary in the coal mine, when you have a generation raised on entitlements, they usually turn to crime in adulthood and the cycle begins.
Fools on here like to scoff, but lol, remember when it was a "bullshyt conspiracy" that the Fed was propping up equities, or, lol, or that Barry was going to start trying to disarm the populace?