Religion/Spirituality what's with all the atheists on the coli?

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
... :mindblown:

:snoop: :pachaha:



If your god isn't supernatural, then what is it? Nature? :heh:
Laugh all you want. The trait isn't strictly for the religious no matter how much your delusional ass wants it to.. :umad:

Its like us but more advanced. A guess that another intelligent life form out there passed us in proggress and affected the universe in a way to be considered a higher power. That's all natural and non supernatural.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State
Laugh all you want. The trait isn't strictly for the religious no matter how much your delusional ass wants it to.. :umad:

Son. How can you claim to have religious traits and not be religious?

Just cause you're not apart of a group of n=10 or more, doesn't mean you're not religious.

Stop being fukking dense. You're just too p*ssy to admit you ARE religious because you know that'd make you look even dumber.

Its like us but more advanced. A guess that another intelligent life form out there passed us in proggress and affected the universe in a way to be considered a higher power. That's all natural and non supernatural.

That doesn't mean anything.

If its another "life form" that doesn't mean its a deity. You might as well say bacteria, trees, and cats are also deities.
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
Son. How can you claim to have religious traits and not be religious?

Just cause you're not apart of a group of n=10 or more, doesn't mean you're not religious.

Stop being fukking dense. You're just too p*ssy to admit you ARE religious because you know that'd make you look even dumber.

That doesn't mean anything.

If its another "life form" that doesn't mean its a deity. You might as well say bacteria, trees, and cats are also deities.
The trait itself isn't religious. Its just a trait the religious and I who is nonreligious share.

Diety? I'm going according to what's considered a higher power. A more advanced life form or forms that have had a hand in our coming to be, would be considered a higher power to us.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State
The trait itself isn't religious. Its just a trait the religious and I who is nonreligious share.

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Man...fukk logic. :heh:

Diety? I'm going according to what's considered a higher power. A more advanced life form or forms that have had a hand in our coming to be, would be considered a higher power to us.

A more "advanced/complicated" life form doesn't mean "higher power"

You can't fly, listen to certain frequencies of sound, hold your breath that long, or see certain ranges of the electromagnetic spectrum, therefore does that mean that bald eagles, elephants, dolphins, and bees are "higher powers?????????"
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State
I need ya'll science averse nikkas to actually TAKE these classes and stop skim reading wikipedia pages and listening to podcasts as the extent of your formal educations.

Ya'll sound WILD ignorant with basic scientific terms, concepts, and phrases.

I need to start seeing some transcripts.
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Man...fukk logic. :heh:



A more "advanced/complicated" life form doesn't mean "higher power"

You can't fly, listen to certain frequencies of sound, hold your breath that long, or see certain ranges of the electromagnetic spectrum, therefore does that mean that bald eagles, elephants, dolphins, and bees are "higher powers?????????"
fukk logic? fukk the dictionary is what your saying lol.

So if another life form who is more advanced than us went and set the steps and created us using natural means what would it or them be considered as?
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State
fukk logic? fukk the dictionary is what your saying lol.

So if another life form who is more advanced than us went and set the steps and created us using natural means what would it or them be considered as?
...another life form.

End of story.

And you have no evidence to support this notion. Even if humans created another branch of life in a lab, that doesn't mean you're THEREFORE its deity.
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
...another life form.

End of story.

And you have no evidence to support this notion. Even if humans created another branch of life in a lab, that doesn't mean you're THEREFORE its deity.
Interesting so what do you consider a deity to be as?

Like describe what you would call an actual diety.
 

NoMayo15

All Star
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
4,422
Reputation
275
Daps
6,203
That's what my guess is all about. I believe that there is a god within the laws of nature.

My question is what reason do you have to believe this is a conscious entity that, for example, decided to create human beings?
 

Blackout

just your usual nerdy brotha
Joined
Jan 26, 2013
Messages
39,992
Reputation
8,135
Daps
98,611
My question is what reason do you have to believe this is a conscious entity that, for example, decided to create human beings?
No reason or else it wouldnt be a guess and would actually be a theory.
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
Bushed
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
310,140
Reputation
-34,205
Daps
620,161
Reppin
The Deep State
Interesting so what do you consider a deity to be as?

Like describe what you would call an actual diety.

I don't believe in any deities. YOU do. Thats why the burden of proof is on you.

I'm not saying no deities exist, and I can't prove a negative.

I'm merely saying that I'm not convinced to accept such a claim.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,850
Reppin
NULL
rapbeats, I can't believe you wrote so much but said so little. What you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I've ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read it. I'll respond to none of your "points", and may god have mercy on your soul. :troll:
still thinking the insults will make that conviction you feel in your soul daily go away. it aint going away.you might as well accept it.
 

rapbeats

Superstar
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,363
Reputation
1,890
Daps
12,850
Reppin
NULL
I can relate to this notion. I didn't take higher levels of physics until I went to NC State, and by that point I had already learned the arguments for/against a deity and abandoned religion.

But I def. thought that if there is a god, it's gotta be within the laws of nature.... I don't even know if that makes sense
he is the law of nature.

the more math we do, the more science we do , the more things we discover we only DISCOVER and find what is already there.

God is sitting at the white board with all of the equations that we have found, will find, and never will have time to sort thru. all of them on his white board.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,002
Daps
132,749
uh no, actually its faith that makes up MATH.

just because you believe everything math has taught you and non of the bible doesnt make you the authority on faith.

do you understand what math is when applying it to things we could not have visually seen with our human eye. since we were not on the planet at that time. so we dont have anything to go on. but a hunch, a good guestimation.

its patterns.

i've explained this to yall before. and you act like its not true. you have yet to prove me wrong here.

you can run all over "religion" and try your best to run over the bible. but you cant tell me the math they use to date things is NOT based on PATTERNS. it IS.

simply put.

if i have been here for 5 years, and no one has been here before me. so i observed the goings on for those 5 years. if i have noticed that say pluto has gone around the sun 1 whole time in 5 years. i will ASSUME based on what i can seee and know as of today. that it takes pluto 5 years to get around the sun 1 whole time. my theory is proven to be accurate when someone else comes along 20 years later and goes back to where i started and does the same research and he/she sees this to remain true for the past 20 years. thats 4 instances of pluto going around the sun, each time taking approx 5 years. so we go ahead and put that in the books. "its official, it takes pluto 1 year to go around the sun." now TRUE science not the RELIGION of science some of you live by. but true science says, Thats the official number...until or unless we find out that number has changed in the future.

everything you know that is based on science and math equations ends in a question mark. ends in a "maybe" or a "perhaps"

this is this....perhaps. this is this...maybe... this is that most likely until we find out it isnt.

if you realized how patters work you would realize there's no way of knowing for 100% sure if the patterns will remain the same forever. all you know is what you know and can see with your own eyes. you dont know if you lived for another 5000 years that the patter would go from it taking 1 year to it taking 2 years, then back to 1.

there's no way of you knowing that the pattern could change like such.

the first 1000 years of pluto gets around the sun once every 5 years. then after that thousandth year it slows down and it starts taking 2 years to get around the same sun. that doesnt mean what you said before was incorrect. it just means the equation is never truly complete or finishes since the universe we live in is never FINISHED growing, expanding, contracting, etc.


so when you look at things that go back further then the human race. we are just guessing.

we are saying well, these type of rocks and these tree rings tells u from the time human's have observed time using those things. is that it takes x amt of years for these things to occur in the tree rings and rocks in the ground. therefore, if use a multiplier.we can assume the older rocks, trees we see are x years old. therefore the earth is x years old.

the reality is, we dont know if things took longer to get from point a to point b back then. we have to ASSUME all things remained constant as we know them today. there's no way we can know if that were the case. we have to have FAITH that this is the case.

do you know why people need to have FAITH in numbers/science?

its the same reason you guys say people need faith in God.

we(humans) need a sense of structure. we need a sense of "okay whats constant". we need to know whats consistent. we need to know, if i wake up tomorrow the sun will shine or it will rain or it will be cold. we need to know that. if we didnt know these things we would lose our minds. the same thing is the reason we desire God. and i'm talking outside of the spiritual aspects for you non believers. we need to BELIEVE in a Constant . it gets no more constant then GOD a creator. especially in the christian bible that says he was the same, is the same and will be the same.

that constant then turns into morality. we need those guidelines. the same formulas that keeps math in check. that keeps us from losing our minds not knowing whats going to happen next. is the same reason we need a moral code. and who better to provide such a constant code but mr Constant himself..GOD..the creator.

again, you dont have to believe. but dont play like you dont understand what i'm talking about just because you dont believe. see notice something. i understand why you DONT believe. even though i do. but for some odd reason it tears you all up inside that i believe even though you dont. you cant UNDERSTAND WHY i would believe such a thing. that tells me the truth is, you do understand why. but you dont want to go there because that will expose whats really going on with you and your belief.

i have a theory that says there are no such things as atheist. not in the true form. i think at some point in time every single human on earth believes in a creator. now what they do after that thought is in there minds is on them. some fight it. some accept it.
you're the type of person fighting it. sure you will say the only reason you're fighting it is because it effects the govvvy's decision making, rules and regs, etc. and that may be true. but you cant be naive enough to believe without religion everything would be kumbaya status. i mean if you know man, you should know that wont happen. but yet you will hide behind that being your reason to have such a disdain for people believing. do you have the same disdain for little kids believing in their little imaginary friends early on in life? the answer is of course you dont. its not that the belief in God bothers govvy rules and regs. its that it bothers your own personal morality. if you believe its true. then you have to subscribe to the same code of conduct as everyone else. and you may not want to do that all the time, every day, every night. sure you may be a "good person" so to speak. but every day you may not want to be this GOOD GUY. and you dont want the burden of not being one to be on your shoulders. nor do you want the burden of having to preach the gospel and spread it to others.
What........the........fukk. :mindblown:
 

Fervid

Largest Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2012
Messages
2,005
Reputation
240
Daps
3,653
rapbeats, I can't believe you wrote so much but said so little. What you just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I've ever read. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this forum is now dumber for having read it. I'll respond to none of your "points", and may god have mercy on your soul. :troll:
Ok. A simple "wrong" would have done just fine but, uh...
 
Top