AnonymityX1000
Veteran
Excuse me so you're saying he didn't look like an older Michael Corleone?!I'm talking about the character bruh.
Excuse me so you're saying he didn't look like an older Michael Corleone?!I'm talking about the character bruh.
what do you mean.... he didnt resemble him physically ? or his mental was different? I guess he was so different because he was a changed man. He was older; sick and filled with regretHe didn't even resemble the Michael from part 1 and 2.
Like I said they should of made this film ten yrs sooner.
Jesus ChristExcuse me so you're saying he didn't look like an older Michael Corleone?!
They don't need to wait for anything. Marlon Brando was made to look 70 yrs old bruh. U think he was an old man when he filmed part 1? Come on yall, think mcfly, thinkwhat do you mean.... he didnt resemble him physically ? or his mental was different? I guess he was so different because he was a changed man. He was older; sick and filled with regret
They waited so long to make the movie so the actors would get older i guess.
Jesus Christ
he didn't look, talk or act like the Michael of the first two films. He was detached from the feel of the first two movies. Obviously Pacino was becoming a caricature of himself and he was different as an actor at that point in his career. So no he didn't resemble the character of the first two films.
Or maybe he was playing amuch older guilt ridden Michael trying to find redemption after killing his brother. Al Pacino today is still a great actor.Jesus Christ
he didn't look, talk or act like the Michael of the first two films. He was detached from the feel of the first two movies. Obviously Pacino was becoming a caricature of himself and he was different as an actor at that point in his career. So no he didn't resemble the character of the first two films.
fukkin Mcfly. About time.I think what you're saying breh, is that this version of michael, even as an old man, had no attachment to whom michael was as a younger cat. Like you couldn't even see shades of the old michael or why Pacino was playing him that way and why he was written that way. I feel you, one of many reasons I do not like this movie
Or maybe he was playing amuch older guilt ridden Michael trying to find redemption after killing his brother. Al Pacino today is still a great actor.
thats the way i saw it that and the fact that he failed to go legit and make a better future for his kids away from all his families bullshyt business. Just like his father failed himOr maybe he was playing amuch older guilt ridden Michael trying to find redemption after killing his brother. Al Pacino today is still a great actor.
Last thing I saw with him was that Phil Spector thing on HBO and he was good in that.He can be when he wants to be. His hit to miss ratio is definitely pointing the wrong way these days but he's still great when he wants to be
i see now that they waited, copolla did not want to make another movie, he finally caved when his career took a dive....i still think they tried to portray a different michaelThey don't need to wait for anything. Marlon Brando was made to look 70 yrs old bruh. U think he was an old man when he filmed part 1? Come on yall, think mcfly, think
Last thing I saw with him was that Phil Spector thing on HBO and he was good in that.
i see now that they waited, copolla did not want to make another movie, he finally caved when his career took a dive....i still think they tried to portray a different michael