What the United States did to the Japanese was worse just as bad as hitler did to Jews

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,077
Reputation
6,023
Daps
132,787
How is anything I said a non sequitur, I'm addressing the points made
lol...no you didn't. Saying Japan started it, Japan is racist, Japan committed horrible war crimes against China, and your parrot-like repetition about how black people shouldn't care about non-white other races has nothing to do with whether or not the bombing of Tokyo and the two nukes on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were horrific, unjustifiable war crimes.
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,331
Reputation
5,935
Daps
94,027
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
lol what does that mean though (no hate)

:upsetfavre:

Im not defending some of the bombings by the USA, but they were against a country that was in alliance to the Nazi's, and that had attacked a US base. The US went overboard in what they did to the Japanese, granted. But their actions are less evil than what Hitler, Mengele and the other Nazi's did. Hitler was the main instigator of the whole war in the first place, causing millions upon millions of deaths across many countries, and specifically targeted multiple groups (mainly Jews) of people based on religious, ethnic or other characteristics (mentally ill, homosexuals, etc), and had them enslaved and executed. The US had camps for Japanese in America, which were also unjust, but they weren't nearly as terrible in comparison to the atrocities at concentration camps run by the Germans. Throwin' up babies and shooting them out the air like discs...burning people alive...performing ridiculous "scientific" experiments. The US targeted the Japanese on the basis of them being at war with Japan. The Germans targeted Jews (and others as aforementioned) for many reasons, such as religious hate, economic scapegoating, supposed derisiveness and deceitfulness on an individual level and on a larger, more conspiratorial level, amongst other things, most of which was spawned by psychotic cult figures as the heads of a nation primarily full of sheep and lackeys who did their billings and propagated the demonic rhetoric to astronomical proportions. There was no direct government able to defend the groups of people targeted because the countries that didn't get down with the Nazis got steamrolled quick, and/or didn't feel strongly enough about the groups targeted to defend them. Japan willfully joined this movement, supported it's major forces, and put their citizens in peril by doing so.

I think we do need to do a "which massacre is worse" thing because the thread is titled "What the United States did to the Japanese was worse (grammar) just as bad as Hitler did to Jews. That directly issues a comparison to both massacres.
 
Last edited:

ill

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
10,234
Reputation
397
Daps
17,297
Reppin
Mother Russia & Greater Israel
@VMR glad to see at least some people on this board can think logically and not nitpick bullshyt to spin ideas to back their outrageous statements.

Its like some of these dudes never took a history class.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
56,788
Reputation
9,412
Daps
175,391
:mjpls:

Y'all nikkas know not what you speak of. Truman was just as racist as hitler. Japan attacked a military base and if you want to know they why look that shyt up yourself.

And none of you can refute anything I said. The US did some foul ass shyt to civilians who had nothing to do with the war.

how is this any differetn from nowadays? We kill kids/innocents in Iraq, don't we?
 

Good Guy Guevara

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
1,545
Reputation
90
Daps
2,951
Reppin
Chicago
Not defending what the US did but Japan was not innocent themselves. What they did to the Chinese and Koreans was just as bad.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,491
Reputation
6,942
Daps
91,295
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
:upsetfavre:

Im not defending some of the bombings by the USA, but they were against a country that was in alliance to the Nazi's, and that had attacked a US base. The US went overboard in what they did to the Japanese, granted. But their actions are less evil than what Hitler, Mengele and the other Nazi's did. Hitler was the main instigator of the whole war in the first place, causing millions upon millions of deaths across many countries, and specifically targeted multiple groups (mainly Jews) of people based on religious, ethnic or other characteristics (mentally ill, homosexuals, etc), and had them enslaved and executed. The US had camps for Japanese in America, which were also unjust, but they weren't nearly as terrible in comparison to the atrocities at concentration camps run by the Germans. Throwin' up babies and shooting them out the air like discs...burning people alive...performing ridiculous "scientific" experiments. The US targeted the Japanese on the basis of them being at war with Japan. The Germans targeted Jews (and others as aforementioned) for many reasons, such as religious hate, economic scapegoating, supposed derisiveness and deceitfulness on an individual level and on a larger, more conspiratorial level, amongst other things, most of which was spawned by psychotic cult figures as the heads of a nation primarily full of sheep and lackeys who did their billings and propagated the demonic rhetoric to astronomical proportions. There was no direct government able to defend the groups of people targeted because the countries that didn't get down with the Nazis got steamrolled quick, and/or didn't feel strongly enough about the groups targeted to defend them. Japan willfully joined this movement, supported it's major forces, and put their citizens in peril by doing so.

I think we do need to do a "which massacre is worse" thing because the thread is titled "What the United States did to the Japanese was worse (grammar) just as bad as Hitler did to Jews. That directly issues a comparison to both massacres.

no thats stupid. all you do is give credibility to a never ending "which massacre is worse" battle. and that argument never stops with military only conflicts....

civilians were killed. leave it at that.

less evil :heh: ....when you enter those debates, no matter what side you're on, you're bound to say something stupid
 

NkrumahWasRight Is Wrong

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
46,331
Reputation
5,935
Daps
94,027
Reppin
Uncertain grounds
no thats stupid. all you do is give credibility to a never ending "which massacre is worse" battle. and that argument never stops with military only conflicts....

civilians were killed. leave it at that.

less evil :heh: ....when you enter those debates, no matter what side you're on, you're bound to say something stupid

look at the thread title :snoop:
 
Top