Can y'all explain why Kyrie, "the most skilled player ever", only had 9 points?
Anyone gonna slander him like he's the 1st option? Cuz when he be going off, he gets that 1st option praise.
nikkas been saying he was a superstar. Remember that? Then they went into a whole ass schpeal on how a superstar is defined.
Then they were saying he's a lockdown defender.
Then they were saying how him having like 5 points at the half, and scoring 0 points in a quarter is actually a good thing.
Then they were saying how he's doing a great job getting his teammates involved. But let that be Draymond green, and nikkas will just say it's a triple single. HMMMM, that's very interesting. Y'all don't find that interesting? Cuz it's VERY interesting to this guy
I just wanna get the facts straight? Is Kyrie a superstar? If so, how come he only scoring 9 points at home with a chance to go up 3-1. If that's Jokic or Curry (actual superstars), They getting slandered all day long.
Is he a lockdown defender? If so, how come he let Shai go off like that? That's very interesting to the kid
Like the dumbass commentators were saying earlier, is it a good thing that Kyrie isn't scoring? If so, what's the benefit of losing a close game at home, with a chance to go up 3-1 and essentially end the series? Did the Superstar/lockdown defender/Super point guard just choke?
I just need my Coli brethren to make some sense of all this! I was told that Kyrie is a magician with the ball and that he's a superstar. But how can a superstar score 9 points on 4-11 shooting at home, with a chance to go up 3-1 and nobody's even surprised?
Am I missing something???