6 billion and 20000 employees
I already provided examples on how socializing an entire country would work.
i posted a link before that shows nigeria makes 90 billion from oil, that is nothing compared with its population of 300 million
As I said, a country with a wealthy majority is rare and an uneasy task. There are 9.2 millionaires in america which has 300 million people. Only 3% of Americans are millionaires
Nigeria is not currently set up to feed a nation of 300 million. The net of 90 billion USD goes to a government budget/agenda. Communism might open up the net of 90 billion USD to everyone. Running a country like a business, were citizens are shareholders might open it up to everyone
provide sustainable wealth to essentially 1 billion people, real wealth, in the modern world
you understand what I am saying, lets not play dumb around here. As I said in the previous post, a myriad of diversified business venture could feed a nation. Royality payments to locals (Which is done in Alaska). State/country sponsored businesses which existed in Libya/North Korea, etc. Diversified means owning a porfolio of businesses. Maybe a company/ elite group needs to generate 1 billion trillion dollars or more, heck if 400 global ultra rich folks from various business are worth 1.3 trillions USD...there really is no a limit, if its just money to gain. of course the minerals business is part of it, whoe else is turning minerals into a commodity besides de beers ceo and cronies, and several small companies, not many people, its an untapped marketed. Also de beers goes into equity deals with african countries, so african countries are eating off of de beers and other business ventures.
what rich nations have in common isnt resources, for example japan has ZERO natural resources, yet its one of the richest in the world
you dont make sense. A smart business person would take $100 billion USD from the mineral business and combine it with over ventures or turn it into more money. As of 2008, 46.4 percent of energy in Japan is produced from petroleum, 21.4 percent from coal, 16.7 percent from natural gas, 9.7 percent from nuclear power, and 2.9 percent from hydropower. what are you talking about Japan has natural and synthesized energy. Africa could build their own/enhance their businesses and resources.
what rich nations have in common is highly educated populations and also i think the most successful black nations are the small island nations in the caribbean, and IMO its because they have 90% literacy, and haiti which has 50% literacy is the least developed
blacks is and could be successful, wherever, blacks success is not limited to Carribean, those areas are also sole tourist business zones.
haiti challenges are not solely from literacy. ever since the haitian revolution, the west, stopped messing with haiti, because haiti wanted to be independent and violently fought off the french
actually no, it is 50%, i have no idea what they are doing, im just saying you cannot develop a nation that is illiterate, you need 90 percent illiteracy to get it cracking and it actually doesnt matter what language
The tests are usually based on whether they could read/write english, or the national language. according to your math, the country with "50%" literacy (with another "50%" to go) would do doing so good because those who could read/write mere English/national language, so they should be will be sooooooooo financially welllllllllllll off.
Africa does shows improvement maybe it was 50% in 1990s, but its climbed to 66% literacy. So now 66% who are literate, should be doing really really good lol
africa has no written languages, so learning a local african language has nothing to do with literacy
lol, are you serious? what were the egyptians writing about in 600 AD, hieroglyphs, all those pharaohs and tombs and archive were hieroglyphs and variations. These developed later into forms known as Hieratic and Demotic. Still later in ancient history, this system was adapted to the Meroitic script in the upper Nile valley. The african oral and written languages have progressed. There are african languages documented to the 1st century.
why would somebody hire somebody that cant read, that is the real question
are you dense? not everyone in Africa cant read/write. If you can read and write, why arent you getting all the of jobs and opportunity? African need to do for self. Also they have been successes found by those who are passionate about an idea inspite of the educational backgrounds. There are also economies for menial labor. Not everyone who could read, write is creating successful businesses, it might be easier, but I wont count the local out. why wont big businesses hire all of the 66% which is approximately 850 million who could read/write? Its not because of literacy. Anyways, Africa gotta build big businesses.
people should know how to read period regardless of a job, reading allows people to communicate, to educate themselves and to be more productive
you think people who cant read/write english/national language are really idling around? what are you reading western survey? if you so inclined about literacy go over there and teach courses. if you are smart, maybe you could turn it into a business...whats that millions who cant read/write, maybe you could teach them and create a business model for them to enhance their lives lol....go save them. Seriously, this is not a bad idea...one could present some solutions to government or ngos. I doubt 170 million illiterate really don't know how to function. Folk from the trailer parks or backwards hoods, dont get jobs or find work? Only illiterates are unemployed? All literates are working?
literacy is important because it allows you to train people and increase their productivity, for example most African countries have constitutions, how would a person even know what your rights are if you cannot read the constitution, how would you know who to vote for if you can't read a newspaper, how would you train somebody to build a car or cellphone if they cant read
they find a community to show them. do you know only 50% in america are actually registered to vote. they says 90% of communication is non verbal...common sense cant be taught, its innate...one thing the illiterate should not be, is marginalized, bring them into the community if they are outside of the community, most of illiteracy are language barriers and schooling, but that is not a requirement for success. If they have a challenges they could be inventive. Use pictures to teach them, they are not stupid. How do foreign country assemble cars designed in the united states? Or design phones in the united states? One teaches them in the process or language they know. Do the 66% / 850 million literate Africans have access to similar factories created in China? illiteracy is an excuse if business don't want to make money in Africa.
reading is fundamental to development, are you trying to suggest that literacy is optional?
A multiple tiered approach is ideal. Work on improving literacy in attention to the list of goals to improve the country.
So they cant read/write, what are the plans? teach them how to read/write, well, see how the plan could implemented. Implement it, or get it, into the hands of those who can. Now what, they could read/write and want more. Give them books. Tell them about their history. Get them into a schooling system, if they dont already have their own community and support systems. Bring them into the national foray of doing things. The labor force/tax base would increase, feed their "hungers". Dont let them forget their original language. Teach them a universal language but dont sell their soul. Let them know another langues but financial benefit from it to.
All of such goes on, while still focused on the master plan of improving the country.