You don’t want wins. You want to feel superior. Only you matter.
You don’t want wins. You want to feel superior. Only you matter.
Always started in 2004? That's news. lolDemocrats always won Wisconsin. stop being selfish.
Yeah, cause the current establishment Dems are all about wins.You don’t want wins. You want to feel superior. Only you matter.
Theres no amount of strategy to account for white anger and disdain.Yeah, cause the current establishment Dems are all about wins.
Obama did it twice and he was Black and had a Muslim name. A white woman lost the white woman vote to a guy who said, "Grab em' by the puzzy!"Theres no amount of strategy to account for white anger and disdain.
Not once did I mention Hillary ClintonKyle is pretty good most of the time. Nap just hating cause he came out strongly against Hillary Clinton.
He is by no means a Libertarian as he is always criticizing Libertarians.
Don’t listen to Nap.
Doesn’t matter. Duverger’s Law always kicks in a first past the post system.
I wish we had ranked choice, alternative voting or mixed member proportional etc.
Third party voting is what privileged cynics do in our system.
I personally blame someone like Joe Rogan for pushing this shyt. Dude has millions of listeners and thousands of hours of audio pushing that divisive third party shyt. The a$$hole couldn’t even vote for Hillary. He boasted of his Gary Johnson vote. I. Hate. That. shyt.
If a third party candidate actually won it would push their issues even more to the forefront. You can't even trust the two parties to do stuff the overwhelmingly majority of citizens want like common sense gun control laws and universal healthcare.I'm not about a third party candidate winning though. Just one getting the 15% needed to stand on stage and introduce new policy ideas that could potentially make their way into one of big two's platforms over time. The idea is that a concept that is treated by the mainstream as fringe gets introduced in a debate and polls positively, therefore the democrats (or republicans) adopt that concept and fit it into their platform in future elections. So we go from Universal Healthcare will never ever happen in early 2016 to every presidential candidate co-signing Universal Healthcare bills by 2018.
Nope. Still wouldn't work on the national stage.I'm not about a third party candidate winning though. Just one getting the 15% needed to stand on stage and introduce new policy ideas that could potentially make their way into one of big two's platforms over time. The idea is that a concept that is treated by the mainstream as fringe gets introduced in a debate and polls positively, therefore the democrats (or republicans) adopt that concept and fit it into their platform in future elections. So we go from Universal Healthcare will never ever happen in early 2016 to every presidential candidate co-signing Universal Healthcare bills by 2018.
an overwhelming majority of citizens vote for the politicians we have.If a third party candidate actually won it would push their issues even more to the forefront. You can't even trust the two parties to do stuff the overwhelmingly majority of citizens want like common sense gun control laws and universal healthcare.
Thanks, maybe try to invision something you have never seen before.an overwhelming majority of citizens vote for the politicians we have.