Thanks man.c
I wish your family well. I'm not being sarcastic.
my point was I think as a man you can't judge a girl when she gets an abortion.
I'm pro-choice and you're pro-life were not going to agree and I respect where you're coming from
Split.@DEAD7 how libeterian are you on this issue?
Does the woman's right to her body trump the babies right to life? and if so why?Split.
Does the woman's rightCAli her body trump the babies right to life? and if so why?
Does filling our already full prisons up with young women(and doctors) guilty of murder sound right? or sane?
Is the child entitled to her body? If not can she evict it as you would a unwanted tenant? If so, what gives the child dominion over her body?
Its a messy issue, and no one wins ultimately.
I go back and forth, currently i'm pro choice, but that can change tomorrow. Its just that messy an issue.
No I don't think a woman's right to her body trumps that of her babies. This is why we have laws on the books against pregnant women drinking, smoking, and doing illegal drugs. Also lefts assume there is this "right to body". Then does not a man have a right to the grooming ons of the unborn child since its partially his body as well?
If that's the law then yes. But murder isn't the right charge. It would have to be more manslaughter, abuse of a child that caused death type charge. Put them in the jail with the blue banders.
Yes the child is entitled to her body since it was her actions that brought the child. If eviction is the term you world like to call abortion it would actually make it harder for pro choice. An eviction is a legal process with a defendant. Obviously with an unwanted tent there are laws to abide by. At least I. What gives the child "dominion" Are the life actions of her mother.
Only in modern America breh. In all actuality it's pretty black and white.
Its a tough issue.
Its a tough issue.
Its a tough issue.you deal in absolutes in everything else......
letting the government decide what a woman does with her body
Its a tough issue.
If I look at as an eviction, which would mean a humane abortion, and the child died because it was incapable of surviving on its own(not being scrambled). I could conclude that it was not murdered...
but i dont know.
side note: I'm trying to move away from absolutes.
Not at all.I hear you...this issue does suck.....so you're a ron Paul libeteruan where you believe in God?
Breh you can't can't look at it as an eviction. That's an easy out. If it's an eviction that means every woman's body is real estate. It seems dodging and questioning the motility of the issue in this instance is leading to even more government control over a woman's body..Its a tough issue.
If I look at as an eviction, which would mean a humane abortion, and the child died because it was incapable of surviving on its own(not being scrambled). I could conclude that it was not murdered...
but i dont know.
side note: I'm trying to move away from absolutes.
Not at all.
This issue is just rough, and i don't think the best thing to do, and the right thing to do, are the same.
edit: I'm going with what i think is best for now
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.htmlI just want to point out that we don't know the circumstances surrounding OP's videos. The third video is titled late term abortion, and most people are against that except in extreme casing. I'm guessing the others are also the same. If that's the case then there was probably some medical reason to end the pregnancy that's unknown to us.... and we should keep that in mind.
It's an unfortunate reality in our society, but we should be striving to make these procedures more safe ... so situations like the one @kevm3 don't happen.
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html
http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html
Can we just be real here for a second? You know and understand the sercemstans im speaking of in this thread. Abortions in America is safe. Safety isn't the problem. Moral responsibility is