Ok as long as you use tha same argument for black people on death row in the United States then you would be consistent
Not the same argument....not even close.
Ok as long as you use tha same argument for black people on death row in the United States then you would be consistent
Not the same argument....not even close.
its the same argument, if you have a problem with the military strike agaisnt syria that is one thing, but all you pieces of shyt praising ghadaffi are disgusting
the difference between me and yall is that i judge obama and ghadafii using the same criteria, i dont write essays about how the NSA is invading my privacy and how obama is violating my constitutional rights and then turn around and praise a dictator for his the electricity grid
either you believe in the right to privacy or you dont, either you believe in individual rights or you dont, get your stories and your principals straight
1. Praising is no where to be shown...respecting a leader who took care of his people is another thing
2. Your knowledge of Libya is very limited which proves your bias towards anything good that people do without the U.S.
3. Without electricity what is possible in the country? No water, No internet, no lights for housing, schools and other buildings
4. Individual Rights means what? You don't live in Libya, nor do you care about their rights. They were happy with 42 years of Gaddafi, if they didn't 6 Million people would have rose up a long time ago to overthrow him.
5. Your logic of "The People's Choice" is contradicting. You claim it's the people's problems when U.S.Foreign Policy fukks up their homeland yet you want to be involved in their problems when their own government goes against them( as you claim).
1. praising is all over this thread, some people even looked up to ghadaffi as a hope for the black race are you not reading the posts in this thread?
2. there is nothing special about libya, libya will develop along the same path every other nation develops
3. exactly, all praises due to obama for keeping the lights on in these here united states, without that we couldnt develop and hopefully now you goys can keep quite so he can be our leader for the next 40 years, apparently keeping the electricity running is enough reason to be dictator for life
4.
5. yep that is correct, obama should have interfered and now the libyan people should fix their problems without a bum like ghadaffi around, over the long run this is a better solution
1. Im speaking for myself....try to speak about my actions, not everyone else.
2. Wrong and wrong. They won't develop b/c there is no unity, only divide in the country with no government responsibility. Militias run the cities. You have no proof or evidence that shows it will flourish.
3. This condescending tone proves you have no knowledge of Libya when G-Man ran it except what you saw or read in U.S. media. You think it was just about some electricity cause you aren't bright enough to read the facts given by the U.N.
4. This is your best response. You claim to be a hard-presser for individual rights but never say what they are. Why should they be different from the rights given already for everyone?
5. So you agree that your logic was stupid and a contradiction. U.S. should invade any nation it seems fit but it's the victims problem to clean it up. It's a good thing you aren't a leader of any country...there would be chaos.
6. I won't respond to your lame and contradicting argument unless you bring facts with your claims. You haven't brought facts that contribute to the discussion.
Talk is cheap as hell, imo. If anything, those of us who criticize O know that well. "Talk about my issue, executive branch!" Just sounds weak, breh.
He's already been to Chicago and spoke on it - http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/15/obama-chicago-gun-violenc_n_2697781.html
What about the state and local governments there and around Illinois? The "Chicago/Syria" comparison meme I keep seeing* is weak for reasons like this.
the Chicago question shows the type of mentality dictators breed and what type of people are attracted to them, dictators breed and attract dependent people
nah. you need to find the time to listen to that vid. that that says everything that needs to be said. i don't have time to write sh1t; i'm doing other things on the puter.Are you able to break your response down briefly in your own words?
the truth of the matter is i dont give a shyt about gadafi. i dont give a shyt about arabs, jews, white ppl you name it. i dont give a sh1t. barack needs to worry about us here. you ppl see barack as a leader. i just see him as president. i see him as the head of a country that is wiping out black ppl.
the way they went in on the homie ghadafi was mind blowing.
i aint seen a country gone from #1 in africa to not mentioned at all in less than a week. we were confused by the media how they are oppressed and how they needed freedom from a tyrant .
the best distraction was that earthquake in japan. instead of ppl focusing on japan they oil companies went in on ghadafi. media just put on lies and barack went in.
the same thing this syrian guy is saying gadafi did. how his ppl love him and it's alqueda who're being supported by foreign forces. no one believed him.
and just like that my mans went from being a billionaire to his own ppl killing him. israel and the western world looking from oversees with clean hands lke
on sohh someone even posted a link of a libyan doctor saying they'd rather share the wealth with the west than gadafi control it.
that sh1t was crayon.