Was King Tut Black or Arabic?

[Leasy]

are they similar to the writings of Ivan Van Sertima? cause i already read his book They Came Before Columbus.

The Viking books just take again European accounts of Vikings in history to prove that the majority of them were Africans who invaded Europe etc... and caused havoc.
No not at all even talks about the CowBoys you know the ones the Europeans swear they created.

 

[Swagnificent]

here's the trailer to the Sidney Poitier Moor movie. looks cheesy as fukk.

 

[Bawon Samedi]

Those could of came from slave stock..14 centuries, 28 million on record slaves..poor communities..

That's a good argument. But...Slaves by Arabs were castrated. And I already debunked that 28 million slave record with two sources vs yours.

That doesn't mean they're the original Arabs.,I know what most people from Yemen look like,,not all of them look like that..

When did I say that? Did you not understand the meaning of that post you quoted? If not. Read it again. Because it seems you didn't understand it.

 

[Leasy]

here's the trailer to the Sidney Poitier Moor movie. looks cheesy as fukk.

Lmao at the 130 mark. Look like some soul glow shyt. I am amazed that they released this.

 

[Swagnificent]

The first people in the Americas were not African...By 15k years those people carried non African clades and were distant from Africans...

Lets be reasonable here people. Now did Africans reach the Americas prior to Columbus? That's a good argument we can make. Since a Mali King DID send ships out...

I agree with this. Ivan van Sertimas book never claims black people were the first to reach the Americas. it only states that they reached there before Columbus as part of the Mali King's expedition.

 

[Bawon Samedi]

I agree with this. Ivan van Sertimas book never claims black people were the first to reach the Americas. it only states that they reached there before Columbus as part of the Mali King's expedition.

Yep. Many people both Eurocentrics and crazed Afrocentrics tend to misinterpret Ivan's work. He never claimed that the Olmecs were black either but that the Olmec heads were of those Africans the Olmec's saw. Heck he even stated not all the Olmec heads were black.

We have to be careful.

But with the Mali expedition. More WORK NEEDS TO BE DONE and more research also.

 

[Swagnificent]

Those could of came from slave stock..14 centuries, 28 million on record slaves..poor communities..

That doesn't mean they're the original Arabs.,I know what most people from Yemen look like,,not all of them look like that..

or not.

I think your problem is that you are trying to fit history into your own preconceptions rather than taking ancient people at their word when they describe themselves. I already posted quotes a few pages back from Arab scholars saying that the color of the pure Arab is black and that white is the color associated with the slave. There have also been several posts showing mass enslavement of europeans by north africans and arabs. Why couldn't the lighter skin arab be the ones that descent from the slave stock? I would say that is more in line with the historical record and reason than the other way around.

Why would dark skin, kinky hair people in arabia surprise anyone when its only 20 miles of sea across from Ethiopia?

 

[Poitier]

Why would dark skin, kinky hair people in arabia surprise anyone when its only 20 miles of sea across from Ethiopia?

Exactly... these idiot act like Africans transformed into a White skinned race the moment the y traversed and settled the Levant and Arabian Peninsula

 

[GetInTheTruck]

In the first migration. 15000 BC is when human migration had reached all corners.

And 10,000 years is enough time for human societies to develop unique identities. African history is hence African, Asian history is Asian, so on and so forth. Your crackpot claims about Africans civilizing others holds no water.

 

[Leasy]

And 10,000 years is enough time for human societies to develop unique identities. African history is hence African, Asian history is Asian, so on and so forth. Your crackpot claims about Africans civilizing others holds no water.

Even if you want to diminish African infleuence you can't. Put it like this Africa had some of the oldest civilizations in the world and of course they did because they are the oldest and as they migrated to different parts of the world some inhabited and some not, they build civilizations. Point blank period.

 

[Leasy]

The first Pyramids are in African and they probably older than 10 thousand years but they didn't influence South America or China Pyramids. Doesn't make sense. Anything to disclaim Africa.

 

[Deluuxe]

Looking at the last page is this one of those "Arabs" enslaving the sub saharan negro things? . If you stripped both them naked in a room you couldn't tell an "Arab" from an African, like Booker T Coleman says they're "Afrabs", because to be an "Arab" you MUST be black. The "Arab" slave trade was black on black crime

A Islamic Moor:

Portraids of Morrocans by Spanish Artist Jose Tapiro

Arab does not denote a Race, you have Dark african ones and you have lighter mixed ones, just like any black community today

 

[Poitier]

And 10,000 years is enough time for human societies to develop unique identities. African history is hence African, Asian history is Asian, so on and so forth. Your crackpot claims about Africans civilizing others holds no water.

No..

agriculture arose WITH civilization and Egypt and Sumer were concurrent

Indus Valley, Olmecs, etc became agricultural much later and thus their identity came later. I also don't claim any of those groups are African.

Lets focus back on the Levant... you know, the place connected to Egypt by the Sinai Peninsula?

 

[GetInTheTruck]

Even if you want to diminish African infleuence you can't. Put it like this Africa had some of the oldest civilizations in the world and of course they did because they are the oldest and as they migrated to different parts of the world some inhabited and some not, they build civilizations. Point blank period.

I'm not diminishing anything, rather it's you who are trying to diminish others by claiming every ancient civilization was really the work of some mythical African expedition who were so advanced they didn't feel the need to keep any records of their exploits.

 

[Leasy]

I'm not diminishing anything, rather it's you who are trying to diminish others by claiming every ancient civilization was really the work of some mythical African expedition who were so advanced they didn't feel the need to keep any records of their exploits.

You call giving people knowledge an exploit why would a continent with the richest resources on the Planet Earth need to exploit. Majority of the Africans who left never came back they stayed where they are for example,

Herotodus stated that in Colchis which is near Russia was an African group of people who stayed there after being on an expedition for one of the Pharaohs. They knew of the Egyptians but the Egyptians knew not of them.