Was King Tut Black or Arabic?

Deluuxe

Deadly Jester
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
2,112
Reputation
-1,405
Daps
4,767
Reppin
Toronto
I'm not diminishing anything, rather it's you who are trying to diminish others by claiming every ancient civilization was really the work of some mythical African expedition who were so advanced they didn't feel the need to keep any records of their exploits.

Yeah, because Im sure these historians or whoever is heading this research is showing everything for the world to see :mjlol:. They are still trying to deny there were blacks in Europe beyond the Islamic Moors. Everytime a black shows up in Europe there's some crackpot story behind it that they have NO PROOF of. I remember reading some CACs saying the Moor on the popes coat of arms was a suprised slave who saved the pope from a bear so they crowned him and made him honorable :russ::russ:

tumblr_lxvd7z5NWJ1qgfbgio2_500.jpg
 

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-741
Daps
27,699
Reppin
Queens
You call giving people knowledge an exploit why would a continent with the richest resources on the Planet Earth need to exploit. Majority of the Africans who left never came back they stayed where they are for example,

Herotodus stated that in Colchis which is near Russia was an African group of people who stayed there after being on an expedition for one of the Pharaohs. They knew of the Egyptians but the Egyptians knew not of them.

I'll call it anything you want as long as you can provide some evidence. So far you've failed to do so.
 

GetInTheTruck

Member
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
15,661
Reputation
-741
Daps
27,699
Reppin
Queens
Yeah, because Im sure these historians or whoever is heading this research is showing everything for the world to see :mjlol:. They are still trying to deny there were blacks in Europe beyond the Islamic Moors. Everytime a black shows up in Europe there's some crackpot story behind it that they have NO PROOF of. I remember reading some CACs saying the Moor on the popes coat of arms was a suprised slave who saved the pope from a bear so they crowned him and made him honorable :russ::russ:

tumblr_lxvd7z5NWJ1qgfbgio2_500.jpg

so they exist, whites are just hiding them. OK.
 
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
39,602
Reputation
-17,826
Daps
84,257
Reppin
NULL
Looking at the last page is this one of those "Arabs" enslaving the sub saharan negro things? :mjlol:. If you stripped both them naked in a room you couldn't tell an "Arab" from an African, like Booker T Coleman says they're "Afrabs", because to be an "Arab" you MUST be black. The "Arab" slave trade was black on black crime

A Islamic Moor:

fk71qo.jpg



Portraids of Morrocans by Spanish Artist Jose Tapiro

tumblr_mizc1zdmdn1rqkjy0o6_1280.jpg

tumblr_mizc1zdmdn1rqkjy0o8_400.jpg

tumblr_mizc1zdmdn1rqkjy0o3_250.jpg

tumblr_mizc1zdmdn1rqkjy0o4_400.jpg


Arab does not denote a Race, you have Dark african ones and you have lighter mixed ones, just like any black community today

yup. and the dark skin arab would described as the pure Arab while the lighter skin one was said to descend from the slave.

arabs enslaving africans was the same as the greeks enslaving the germans. different ethnic groups that would today be considered the same race under our social construct.
 

Deluuxe

Deadly Jester
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
2,112
Reputation
-1,405
Daps
4,767
Reppin
Toronto
so they exist, whites are just hiding them. OK.

YAWN. Do you believe they present the full factual truth 100% of the time?:russ:. As long as the system of white supremacy exist, the digging of the African identity is a MUST, but seeing a few of your post around here you probably don't believe such a thing even exists:mjlol:.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,222
Look if you are going to start bringing up time machines to help make your point, you already don't have a leg to stand on. Having dark skin is a trait shared by a significant portion of humanity. It is not the sole factor that defines a people and their identity.

Secondly, If you are going to support theories that say some mysterious African civilization went around not only Asia and the middle east, but also the americas, colonizing and erecting great civilizations, youre going to have to present some evidence. Humans created writing in order to keep records. Where are they?

If the records don't exist than at least submit that these are your personal opinions and cannot be deemed factual by any stretch of the imagination.
Aren't you Muslim..?

Shouldn't you know that at least one good thing about islam coming to other parts of AFrica.. is that some of the research, digging, discoveries, and knowledge wouldn't have even been looked for if it wasn't for Arabic writing documenting older civilizations... Some of these tribes didn't record shyt. That doesn't mean they didn't exist.... that doesn't mean that they didn't migrate and spread cultures the way they did. WHY in the fukk did it take the 21st century for people to believe the stuff that we know for a fact is true now?? Why does it take more and more shyt to be found each year to tell us what we know is true just so that we can shut up the people who say "If you are going to support theories that say some mysterious African civilization went around not only Asia and the middle east, but also the americas, colonizing and erecting great civilizations, you're going to have to present some evidence. Humans created writing in order to keep records. Where are they?"
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,222
yup. and the dark skin arab would described as the pure Arab while the lighter skin one was said to descend from the slave.

arabs enslaving africans was the same as the greeks enslaving the germans. different ethnic groups that would today be considered the same race under our social construct.
:ohhh:

I'm confused though... doesn't that still make them uncle Ahmeds?
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,222
While I do agree the Sumerians would be very dark skinned and would be resemble blacks. I doubt they would be related to Africans based off some studies I read. They probably resembled modern day Dravidian's.
4e0c381a98c0a.jpg


Just my opinion. Also I doubt Sumeria was older than Ancient Egypt. There are many things that contradict that claim and many Historians are starting to agree again that Egypt was older.

I agree that Egypt was older... but


do you have proof. offline, in real life i heard someone making this point.....

and he got destroyed.
 

Blackking

Banned
Supporter
Joined
Jun 4, 2012
Messages
21,566
Reputation
2,476
Daps
26,222
@Swagnificent you understand that the Arab slave trade has existed for like over a 1000 years..maybe more maybe less..but those paintings that you posted prob came from slave stock..maybe not..all I'm saying is that Arabs differentiated between blacks in the slave trade for a 1000 years..it wasn't like " oh lets go kidnap arabs" no..it was like "lets go take some black ass Africans"

If the Arabs were really black they would have Arab slaves and not black slaves..they saw a difference between the the two..
Think of the fact that other african took other africans and other cac took other cac.......... They were going after people in less productive enviornmental climates with less resources, armies and infrastructure... to support their kingdoms is all.

And do you also have issue with northern African Muslims taking Whites as slaves??


20 millions freaking slaves so it is a tradegy, But look at the ALL stars of the trade shyt........ like tippu Tip ------ There looked like Western African... you can not tell them from the slaves they were capturing. They were arabs, yeah....... but they were racially, physically identical to the slaves. They just had more water, weapons, and spoke a different language.

Then in recent times when CAC started hating Muslims (all muslims) the phrase changed to Islam Slave trade --- even though 100% of historians say that islam wasn't a factor in the trade.... it wasn't about religion. The only time it was about religion was when an African Christian Kingdom wouldn't get down or lay down and pay that tax--- But think about that shyt............. A Christian African kingdom. Anyway, eventually places like saudi arabia and Western Europe were in full force with trading africans because they were AFricans.......... but it's incorrect to place that on Arabs or muslims.
 

Marvel

Psalm 149:5-9
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
8,804
Reputation
820
Daps
15,168
Reppin
House of Yasharahla
people need to get it straight. the og arabs were BLACK. what you have now are mostly mulatoo and eurasian tribes that adopted the arabic language claiming to be arabs.


the first arab was born of a woman being an egyptian black slave name
HAGAR
hagar.jpg

As Thomas Jefferson had sex with his African slave and disowned his offspring, I was Father Abraham's African sex slave. After I had his son, he disowned him and sent us away.

HAGAR
MOTHER OF THE FIRST ARAB

This black woman from the continent of Africa is reported in Scripture as the first sex slave namely to Abraham father of the Arab and Jewish people. The God of Israel is not the same as Allah, for the God of the Bible is partial toward His chosen people, called Israelites, Israelis, or Jews. When Abraham impregnated his wife's African slave whom she obtained from Pharaoh, the greatest king in Africa, God never acknowledged the child as Abraham's heir. He would refer to him as "the lad" the son of the "bond (bondage) woman." He told Abraham to take his "only son" Isaac and offer him, ignoring Ishmael, the biracial child, of Abraham who was prophesied to be a wild man who will be uncontrollable by nations as he dwelled among his Jewish brethren. Read about this greatest and longest family feud in history in The Complete Works of Blacks in the Bible. This website does not give you a half of what this book holds.

Hagar was Abraham's 2nd wife. She was originally an Egyptian bond woman, not a sex slave and Sarah told him to marry her so that she can have a kid, since she was still childless and old. The reason Ishmael was not given the inheritance promised by God is because the promise was to Abram and Sarai, not to Hagar. Ishmael received a different blessing.

Genesis 16:11-13
11 And the angel of the Lord said unto her, Behold, thou art with child and shalt bear a son, and shalt call his name Ishmael; because the Lord hath heard thy affliction.

12 And he will be a wild man; his hand will be against every man, and every man's hand against him; and he shall dwell in the presence of all his brethren.

Genesis 17
17 Then Abraham fell upon his face, and laughed, and said in his heart, Shall a child be born unto him that is an hundred years old? and shall Sarah, that is ninety years old, bear?

18 And Abraham said unto God, O that Ishmael might live before thee!

19 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him.

20 And as for Ishmael, I have heard thee: Behold, I have blessed him, and will make him fruitful, and will multiply him exceedingly; twelve princes shall he beget, and I will make him a great nation.

21 But my covenant will I establish with Isaac, which Sarah shall bear unto thee at this set time in the next year.
This blessing is the reason why the Arab man beefs with everybody, even until this very day. It was his blessing to be a wild man.

We can all agree that the Arab man is a wild man and that he beefs with everybody and everybody beefs with him. So the prophecy of the LORD is fulfilled.
 

observe

Banned
Joined
Nov 12, 2012
Messages
21,617
Reputation
2,601
Daps
30,856
Reppin
The Forest Where Hope Died
These are fukking :duck:..never has Africa really invaded the Middle East to start an african civilization in the Middle East..never in their history..so how can Arabs be black..I'm going to school for African and Middle eastern studies..and all you guys is posting propaganda from unreliable websites about shyt that doesn't have to do with anything like moors in Europe..what the fukk does that have to do with anything:rudy:


Asking me what sub Sahara means, not knowing shyt about the Arab slave trade ..talking about the Arabs don't control North Africa....all you nerds know is some bullshyt propaganda
 
Last edited:

Marvel

Psalm 149:5-9
Joined
May 19, 2012
Messages
8,804
Reputation
820
Daps
15,168
Reppin
House of Yasharahla
yup. and the dark skin arab would described as the pure Arab while the lighter skin one was said to descend from the slave.

arabs enslaving africans was the same as the greeks enslaving the germans. different ethnic groups that would today be considered the same race under our social construct.

The biggest thing that people don't realize is that there were two black branches from Noah: Shem and Ham.

Zondervan’s Compact Bible Dictionary:

Ham – The youngest son of Noah, born probably about 96 years before the Flood; and one of eight persons to live through the Flood. He became the progenitor of the dark races; not the Negroes, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans and Canaanites.

Japheth fathered some of the people north and east of the Middle East, opposite of Ham.

Even the white man is starting to admit that descendants of West Africa (Negroes) are not from Ham. I guess it takes them to say it before some of you believe though :youngsabo:
 
Last edited:
Top