sources? (non biblical,anthropological references)
not dissin..
I can post later.. i'm trying to struggle iron a shirt right now....
but there are all sorts of historians , anthropologist.. etc that clearly state (and are ignored due to hollywood n shyt)
that white semitic north africans in antiquity is a myth.
the first people to populate and develop all of arabia were black
The only semitic presence in early north africa is a black semitic one. - basically black migrant to Levant and others
nubians were there originally seeking the better climate and water.
ntm every AT least should know that the orginal speaking of the afroasian language - Arabic were descendents of Kushytes.
3K years before Muhammad blacks and others were speaking Arabic.... thousands of years before 'whiter' people adopted to the language--- it was closer to Hebrew.... the further back you go the closer the language is to Hebrew --for example Kush is the ancient name of Midian, Midianites is the Earliest group historian have that speak and act arabic...... They were black--- as a matter of fact there weren't even any lightskinned or mixed Midianites in northern Arabia.
kush, qedar, israel- black... and Qedar was the most powerful tribe in Syria in 7th centurybc ... There are Islamic songs n shyt about how these tribes were black and people still sing them.
Even with the mixing 1 century before Muhammad the vast majority of arab and AFroarab tribes were consider black to the world - Indians, Asians and CAC all thought of Arabia as black.
18th and 19th centrurys is when most of the changes happened... even people who traveled to the area.... said that prior to that even the light ones basically resembled black Americans who we call black.
The ancient Egyptian, cushytic Chadic , Arabic - all semitic black languages and cultures for nearly all of history with no mixing until recently. Most of modern history shows that Afroasiactic languages originated in Asia.... but now we see they originated in Africa (where most of these languages and cultures still exist- not asia) NTM , obviously Africans verbally communicated before they populated Asia.
Then we look at some of the physical features of some asians and arabs. The Eritrean /ethiopian look that some of these groups have is just biology and changes over time...... it's not because of some CAC version of semite invasion or none of that shyt - It's because of the Africans in the north and east living in hot stone age environments and just adapting physically different than west and south africans..... then spreading to Asia.