Wanna See Who's Buying Their Followers On Twitter..?

[Akademiks]

Status People Fake Follower Check — Social Media Management Platform for Business

Thread over.

They take a sample and match it against a criteria just like I predicted. No way they are going through every single one.

How does it work?

We take a sample of your follower data. Up to 500 records depending on how 'popular' you are and assess them against a number of simple spam criteria.

On a very basic level spam accounts tend to have few or no followers and few or no tweets. But in contrast they tend to follow a lot of other accounts.

Ended the thread ... Good night.

 

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

Thread over.

They take a sample and match it against a criteria just like I predicted. No way they are going through every single one.

Who said they were

 

[OnlyInCalifornia]

SMH @ this guy, just like I told you, they have a database.

 

[hustlemania]

SMH @ this guy, just like I told you, they have a database.

seriously, dudes gotta be mildly retarded..

 

[Akademiks]

For those of you with 10,000 followers or less we believe our tool will provide a very accurate insight into how many inactive and fake followers you have.

If you're very 'popular' the tool will still provide good insight but may better reflect your current follower activity rather than your whole follower base.

Nyggas such dikkriders on here they can't accept the truth . . . Let it burn. If it can barely give you an accurante assessment with over 10 K followers how the fukk will it be able to calculate Jim jones followers when he got 2.7 million?

The index they have is that they then save their sample result for popular accounts since you nyggas will constantly search "@50cent" "@Justinbieber" @kanyewest but even then they admit they only take a sample of their followers to calculate their totals. A sample that is about 500 which is under .001 % of someone like Jim Jones actual follow count. How stupid do you feel?

Plus you gotta realize its gonna be very skewed for celebrities who constantly have ad bots following them because they are verified or they are a popular tag/username for what their product searches for when they queries to follow people.

 

[Harry B]

Completely BS.

You think a website can go through millions of followers in about 6 seconds to determine if their followers are real or fake lol???


n

yea

IamAkademiks - 23,195 followers.
0% Fake
2% Inactive
98% Good

still a load of BS though.

and btw if yall nyggas want followers all u need is to do 3 things.

1. Follow people who will follow you back. Following 300 celebs when they wont follow u back = fail
2. Tweet content that those ppl wanna see n interact with them. Mostly ppl who care about hip hop follow me.
3. Promote yourself (twitter account) on all platforms. I do on radio, videos, parties, any tme I dj or write somewhere I drop my twitter name.

Worked for me.

But as I said about twitter. You can have 1,000,000 ppl following you but if only 1,000 care what you think its just as good as having 1,000 followers.

Akademiks {{+_+}} (IamAkademiks) on Twitter

They can use statistics and sample whatever the statistics suggest.
When they are looking at polls for an election they are like 95% sure that the numbers reflect the population, by asking a few thou.

 

[Carr]

Nyggas such dikkriders on here they can't accept the truth . . . Let it burn.

its still a good insight....u said earlier it was Complete BS.

 

[OnlyInCalifornia]

Nyggas such dikkriders on here they can't accept the truth . . . Let it burn. If it can barely give you an accurante assessment with over 10 K followers how the fukk will it be able to calculate Jim jones followers when he got milliions?

What is the truth? That you thought it was all made up because Twitter only lets you send x amount of queries a day only to realize you were wrong so you are running with the 'they only use a sample' angle to prove what exactly? That is is not 100% accurate? No shyt. Nothing is 100% accurate online.

Hustlemania created this thread not because of rappers but because people have a ton of followers who don't tweet about shyt that came into question. Like for real, it seems like you are arguing extra hard against this site for some ulterior motive.

 

[hustlemania]

Nyggas such dikkriders on here they can't accept the truth . . . Let it burn. If it can barely give you an accurante assessment with over 10 K followers how the fukk will it be able to calculate Jim jones followers when he got milliions?

The index they have is that they then save their sample result for popular accounts since you nyggas will constantly search "@50cent" "@Justinbieber" @kanyewest but even then they admit they only take a sample of their followers to calculate their totals.

aint you the dude who blocked Mook, cause he called you out for having a roughly 8k jump in followers outta nowhere

What is the truth? That you thought it was all made up because Twitter only lets you send x amount of queries a day only to realize you were wrong so you are running with the 'they only use a sample' angle to prove what exactly? That is is not 100% accurate? No shyt. Nothing is 100% accurate online.

Hustlemania created this thread not because of rappers but because people have a ton of followers who don't tweet about shyt that came into question. Like for real, it seems like you are arguing extra hard against this site for some ulterior motive.

 

[zerozero]

What is the truth? That you thought it was all made up because Twitter only lets you send x amount of queries a day only to realize you were wrong so you are running with the 'they only use a sample' angle to prove what exactly? That is is not 100% accurate?

Hustlemania created this thread not because of rappers but because people have a ton of followers who don't tweet about shyt that came into question. Like for real, it seems like you are arguing extra hard against this site for some ulterior motive.

Even if it's 500 followers analyzed, that's more than a 350queries/hr limit

So they're definitely not sending a fresh query for each follower and have designed something more intelligently than that

 

[Akademiks]

its still a good insight....u said earlier it was Complete BS.

It is.

Making an assessment of an account with over 2.7 followers when you've only looked at 500 of them is completely bull.

 

[OnlyInCalifornia]

Even if it's 500 followers analyzed, that's more than a 350queries/hr limit

So they're definitely not sending a query for each follower and have designed something more intelligently than that

They are taking a sample and matching it up against THEIR OWN DATABASE.

 

[Akademiks]

They are taking a sample and matching it up against THEIR OWN DATABASE.

So a sample of 500 followers of someone that might have 5 million is accurate to you?

 

[45123]

Twitter followers do not determine or even indicate a slight hint of record sales

 

[hustlemania]

They are taking a sample and matching it up against THEIR OWN DATABASE.

this is getting embarrassing..