It's an interesting debate, though I don't believe the men on the panel were best suited to counter it. The obvious question would be if the excess presence of conditions constitutes love, which is what Destiny implied.
You could easily make the argument that height requirements, money requirements, protection and provision requirements have nothing to do with loving the person, but loving what the person gives you whether that be social status, financial independence, etc. Destiny is really good at debate so you have to understand how to flip arguments and place doubt into his points.
When he debates he exposes people who just stick to talking points and statistics. Sneako for sure isn't the type who can hang in that type of conversation, and I doubt FnF are either.