Virginia Candidate admits to being a PEDO

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,043
Reputation
4,538
Daps
81,424
Reppin
The Arsenal
He's a sick individual(who needs to be put down) and He was already down until...

"Larson’s criminal record precluded him from running for office until last year, when Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe (D) restored voting and other civil rights to thousands of convicted felons across the state."
- The Washington Post



giphy.gif

nice try, troll
look at this cac shyt. mcauliffe shouldn't have restored felon voting rights (something that benefits black men disproportionately to the extreme) because some alt-right pedo might have his voting rights restored as well. yeah way to try and distract you fukkin cacroach.
 

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,057
Reputation
1,213
Daps
44,008
Reppin
NULL
look at this cac shyt. mcauliffe shouldn't have restored felon voting rights (something that benefits black men disproportionately to the extreme) because some alt-right pedo might have his voting rights restored as well. yeah way to try and distract you fukkin cacroach.
giphy.gif

Im saying he shouldnt have done a "blanketed" restoration for felon voting rights because then you wonder why we have a situation like this where sick individuals not only have voting rights but is running for office ..which seems to benefit a white man :dwillhuh:(my point has nothing to do with black men...being that im a black man myself :mjlol:).
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,043
Reputation
4,538
Daps
81,424
Reppin
The Arsenal
giphy.gif

Im saying he shouldnt have done a "blanketed" restoration for felon voting rights because then you wonder why we have a situation like this where sick individuals not only have voting rights but is running for office ..which seems to benefit a white man :dwillhuh:(my point has nothing to do with black men...being that im a black man myself :mjlol:).
you ain't no damn black man, fukkin weasel ass cacroach. you're trying to muddy the issue. he should have the right to vote and run for office and we should have the right to mock those that support and affiliate with him because birds of a feather flock together. that's your problem with him, he's an embarrassment to your pedo loving alt-right loser subreddit culture.
 

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,057
Reputation
1,213
Daps
44,008
Reppin
NULL
you ain't no damn black man, fukkin weasel ass cacroach. you're trying to muddy the issue. he should have the right to vote and run for office and we should have the right to mock those that support and affiliate with him because birds of a feather flock together. that's your problem with him, he's an embarrassment to your pedo loving alt-right loser subreddit culture.
you are an imbecile.
so you are saying a pedophile should have the right to vote and run for office :francis:but its okay because then you get to mock him...?

you are defending the very thing you are supposed to be against and defending what enables those people,:dwillhuh:
cognitive dissonance like a mf
 

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,057
Reputation
1,213
Daps
44,008
Reppin
NULL
and his felony record didn't even have anything to do with his sick pedo ways just like most of the people in that alt-right culture haven't been convicted of anything related to that. he had a felony for threatening to kill the president.

So then McAuliffe still let him off the hook? :patrice:
 

chico25

All Star
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
2,007
Reputation
420
Daps
5,681
Reppin
NULL
giphy.gif

Im saying he shouldnt have done a "blanketed" restoration for felon voting rights because then you wonder why we have a situation like this where sick individuals not only have voting rights but is running for office ..which seems to benefit a white man :dwillhuh:(my point has nothing to do with black men...being that im a black man myself :mjlol:).

A blanket restoration is exactly how it had to be done. If you left it subjective so people in charge could pick and choose whose rights were restored it would have been mostly black men still unable to vote.
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,043
Reputation
4,538
Daps
81,424
Reppin
The Arsenal
you are an imbecile.
so you are saying a pedophile should have the right to vote and run for office :francis:but its okay because then you get to mock him...?

you are defending the very thing you are supposed to be against and defending what enables those people,:dwillhuh:
cognitive dissonance like a mf
i will stop now because this is how cacroach trolls like you win. see how it's becoming less about this sick fukk and the alt-right circles he runs in (similar to the ones you run in) and how a democratic virginia governor restored his voting rights related to a felony he had for making threats to the president while he was in colorado. that's the key take away folks. so the governor should have been more selective: no restoration for people with threats of violence ... what else? drug charges because pedos are in that subset too. pedos are in every subset of convicted criminals. so the point you're making is NO RESTORATION and you don't risk a proud pedo having the right to vote and run for office. there are proud pedos without felony records. if black women in alabama didn't vote at a much higher rate compared to the other demos we'd have a proud pedo sitting senator. so that's not your issue. you're just here to muddy the waters.
 

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,057
Reputation
1,213
Daps
44,008
Reppin
NULL
A blanket restoration is exactly how it had to be done. If you left it subjective so people in charge could pick and choose whose rights were restored it would have been mostly black men still unable to vote.

Statistically because of the abnormal amount of black men in prison that wouldnt be the case if it was left to subjectivity
There would still be more black men who's rights were restored individually. And your point is moot because the blanket still allowed pedo's like Larson off the hook, when that could have been a black male who's trying to get his life together, w/ family,etc if it was subjective restoration.
Are you fine with "blanketed" reparations?:leostare:
Where black people get reparations but people like Larson get the same "reparations" too?
 

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,057
Reputation
1,213
Daps
44,008
Reppin
NULL
i will stop now because this is how cacroach trolls like you win. see how it's becoming less about this sick fukk and the alt-right circles he runs in (similar to the ones you run in) and how a democratic virginia governor restored his voting rights related to a felony he had for making threats to the president while he was in colorado. that's the key take away folks. so the governor should have been more selective: no restoration for people with threats of violence ... what else? drug charges because pedos are in that subset too. pedos are in every subset of convicted criminals. so the point you're making is NO RESTORATION and you don't risk a proud pedo having the right to vote and run for office. there are proud pedos without felony records. if black women in alabama didn't vote at a much higher rate compared to the other demos we'd have a proud pedo sitting senator. so that's not your issue. you're just here to muddy the waters.
With subjective restoration there is a better chance that black male gets restored rights than a potential pedophile who threatened the president

Are you ok with an alt-right pedo having the same rights/standing in society as a black male who might have made a mistake but is trying to get his life together?

if so who's the "alt-right cacroach" me or you? :patrice:
 

chico25

All Star
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
2,007
Reputation
420
Daps
5,681
Reppin
NULL
Statistically because of the abnormal amount of black men in prison that wouldnt be the case if it was left to subjectivity
There would still be more black men who's rights were restored individually. And your point is moot because the blanket still allowed pedo's like Larson off the hook, when that could have been a black male who's trying to get his life together, w/ family,etc if it was subjective restoration.
Are you fine with "blanketed" reparations?:leostare:
Where black people get reparations but people like Larson get the same "reparations" too?

You're full of shyt so this will be my last post addressing you.

Voting is a right afforded to all citizens that is taken away from felons as part of the punishment for their crimes. Once that felon has paid the debt for their crime they are citizens again and should have all the rights that go with it. If a felon is going to lose their rights for life then they should get a lifetime prison sentence. If the crime didn't warrant that by law then denying them rights is bullshyt.

Your blanket reparations strawman doesn't work as an argument because by definition reparations can't be a blanket thing. Reparations is making restitution to a group that has been wronged in some way.

This guy is a piece of shyt with little to no chance of being elected. However, he served his sentence for the felony he was arrested for and shouldn't be disqualified from running because of it. People should be made aware of who he is so they don't vote for him. Beyond that it should be left alone.
 

Stone Cold

Superstar
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
13,057
Reputation
1,213
Daps
44,008
Reppin
NULL
You're full of shyt so this will be my last post addressing you.

Voting is a right afforded to all citizens that is taken away from felons as part of the punishment for their crimes. Once that felon has paid the debt for their crime they are citizens again and should have all the rights that go with it. If a felon is going to lose their rights for life then they should get a lifetime prison sentence. If the crime didn't warrant that by law then denying them rights is bullshyt.
You are speaking on how things should be rather than how things are. In a utopian society i agree with you. In real life, this allows people like Larson, rapists, pedophiles, white supremacists, to slip through the cracks. Do you want people like Larson sitting as a juror in a criminal case?:dwillhuh:

Your blanket reparations strawman doesn't work as an argument because by definition reparations can't be a blanket thing. Reparations is making restitution to a group that has been wronged in some way.
Reparations can indeed be a:"blanket thing"...:comeon:

This guy is a piece of shyt with little to no chance of being elected. However, he served his sentence for the felony he was arrested for and shouldn't be disqualified from running because of it. People should be made aware of who he is so they don't vote for him. Beyond that it should be left alone.
Again I dont want this guy being a juror let alone even thinking about running for anything except a ditch to hide in
 
Last edited:
Top