Kyshawn George
6-foot-7 wing | 20 years old | Miami (Fla.)
Vecenie’s draft positioning: No. 20 to the
Cleveland Cavaliers.
Q: George is a skilled wing with great size. He has shown flashes at times but has also disappeared in spots. He dipped to single digits in scoring in 18 of his 31 games and cracked double-digit shot attempts in only five games. How do you project upside in a passive/low usage player?
A: He’s way below average athletically for an NBA player, even at the size that he’s at, so he doesn’t have much ability to create separation. His path long term is probably to be a special shooter. He could maybe be like Cam Johnson of the
Nets as a guy with size that can shoot the ball, but Johnson played five years of college. Kyshawn is old for a freshman, so Cam was like three years older when he left college. But the ability to shoot on the move and run off screens and fire is probably the way he’ll be able to get shots in the NBA.
I don’t think he’s athletic enough to do much else, but that has not been his style of play or what his game has been growing up. He’s been more of a ballhandler. And so, I think he’s gonna have a very challenging adjustment for several years. I don’t think he thinks he’s Ducnan Robinson, you know? But he can’t be the type of player that he has wanted to be or has tried to be in college, and the lower usage rate is indicative of that. He was not able to get shots as a college player. And then lack of physicality, lack of strength, lack of athleticism are problems on the defensive end, as well.
Yves Missi
6-foot-11 big man | 20 years old | Baylor
Vecenie’s draft positioning: No. 21 to the
New Orleans Pelicans.
Q: It’s easy to see what Missi will do in the NBA. He’s a near 7-footer that rolls to the hoop and finishes well. On the defensive end, he moves his feet and is a rim protector, using his 7-foot-2 wingspan. He played a small offensive role at Baylor, averaging only 6.7 shots per game in 22 minutes.
What are the things you look for in big men with smaller roles in college to project them to be starters at the NBA level? How do you distinguish a Michell Robinson from a
Mo Bamba?
A: Robinson is much, much more athletic than Mo Bamba. I think (that’s) the biggest difference there.
Missi doesn’t have the same level of size or length that Robinson does, but I think he’s very much along the lines of a
Jericho Sims with a chance to be a little bit better than that. And so, I don’t know if they want to try their hand again at that player type and get just a little bit better version of it. But he’s not quite as big or as far above the rim as Robinson. He’s probably got a three- or four-inch lower standing reach. And he’s certainly not skilled like (Isaiah) Hartenstein.
So I think if (the Knicks) wanted to go that route, (they could) get him for a Sims-type (role) and just hope he can develop a little bit more than Sims did. I think his movement ability on the perimeter is interesting. If you look at him versus
Precious Achiuwa, obviously Missi doesn’t have the same ambitions that Achiuwa does to be more than a center, but in terms of how the Knicks use Achiuwa as just a rebounder and defender, he’s probably along those lines.
Jonathan Mogbo
6-foot-6 big man | 22 years old | San Francisco
Vecenie’s draft positioning: No. 44 to the
Houston Rockets.
Q: Mogbo is a smaller big man who thrives as a passer and a finisher around the rim. He has a 7-foot-2 wingspan, which allows him to cover more ground as a defender. He is a great play initiator but has almost no outside shot. He only attempted two 3s during his two collegiate seasons — and he missed them both. How do you project an undersized, non-shooting, playmaking big to the NBA today?
A: Thibs has shown more willingness than most to play a double-big lineup. He’ll sometimes play two non-shooters and value the rebounding and defense you’d get from that. Thibs also did a great job utilizing Hartenstein as a handoff guy and passer. That has been something they’ve been willing to incorporate. Of course, Thibs had a lot of success with Joakim Noah as well earlier in his career, so it’s something he knows how to use. But Mogbo is small, so there will be limitations there as a rim protector, for sure.
Thibs might try to slot him into the Achiuwa-playing-the-non-shooting-four-type of situation that we saw some this season. He’s a much better passer than Achiuwa but not quite as big and not as good a shooter, even though Achiuwa’s not much of a shooter. But I think that with a lot of these guys that you’ve mentioned, there’s a version of what could happen for them over the next five, six, seven years, depending on what age they are, where they’re a much different player than they are now. But in terms of looking at their fit on the Knicks and what they’ll be in the next year or two, you can’t expect that much change. I think you just have to evaluate where they’re at now and how they fit into the way the Knicks play and not necessarily what they’ll evolve into.
Kevin McCullar Jr.
6-foot-5 wing | 23 years old | Kansas
Vecenie’s draft positioning: No. 52 to the
Golden State Warriors.
Q: McCullar is one of the more experienced college players, just finishing his fifth year at Kansas. In his senior season, he averaged 18 points, six rebounds, four assists and had a 28 percent usage rate, an increase of almost 10 percentage points from his fourth season. On top of that, he has a 6-foot-9 wingspan and shot 44 percent on unguarded catch-and-shoot jumpers, according to Synergy.
The profile looks like an easy fit as a 3-and-D wing, but just a year before he shot 28 percent on open catch-and-shoot jumpers. How much stock should be put into year-over-year shooting improvements, especially in older college players?
A: Obviously, guys do make progress to some extent, but I think you have to be wary of guys where the progress had a lot to do with them having a green light and having the ball in their hands and being able to play with confidence.
Is a guy more of an on-ball player? Is he more of an off-ball player? Because a lot of guys that are on-ball players will have their best shooting numbers as upper-classmen in college, when they get to play on the ball they can feel comfortable and in a rhythm and play the way they’re most confident. And then they get to the NBA and unless they’re a very talented guy they have to be off-ball players and then it’s often hard for them to become confident and find rhythm with their shooting.
That can be a big challenge, especially for a guy like McCullar, where we did not see a lot of shooting success until his fifth year of college. We already had a big sample of him as a shooter before that. So I’d be a little skeptical that he’s gonna come in and shoot the ball well off the catch. I don’t think that’s part of his identity.