USPS Crisis: Postmaster General slowing mail & in contact with Republican Party officials!

General Mills

More often than not I tend to take that L.
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
30,623
Reputation
20,140
Daps
228,124
Reppin
Piffsburgh, PA
naw ups is struggling bad right now. We started shipping out monitors to remote employees and it’s taking 3-5 days, when we pay for next day shipping and everyone lives in or around our office city.


On top of that they charge almost twice as much as usps.

they started these remote privately owned franchises and the franchises are not even on the same systems. They’re a shytshow right now. Their infrastructure is being exposed.

I’m not a trump fan, but forcing USPS to make China pay their fair share is needed.

THIS! Went to a privately owned franchise and they were :dwillhuh: about everything. And when they finally understood what I wanted the prices for some reason were damn near 2x more than it should have been.:gucci:

I left and they were confused as to why I did not ship with them. smh
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,271
Reputation
4,635
Daps
82,355
Reppin
The Arsenal


Random, but this just popped up Reddit.

:francis:

i'm USPS all day erry day, but one of the reasons fedex charges that much is because they are treating it as if that's going to be their only trip to that "area" so they're gonna make sure it's profitable for them. if they were guaranteed to be in that area every day delivering volume it couldn't possibly be that high. it wouldn't be 50 cents for sure though.
 

Gus Money

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,537
Reputation
1,551
Daps
30,540
There seems to be this idea floating around the HL left that the Republican party isnt part of our govt.:patrice: If i say "govt program A is inefficient and/or unsustainable" the response is "its the GoP"... as if that makes my statement false.
As long as its public its subject to political fukkery.
GoP shenanigans are an argument for privatizing.
:bryan:

It's deeper than your surface level "government programs are inefficient" analysis because the government as a whole isn't to blame. The GOP constantly goes out of its way to shyt on government programs that are proven to help people in favor of propping up corporations and the rich.

The party of fiscal responsibility is ALWAYS fukking up the money. Tax cuts, corporate welfare for the rich, defunding key social programs, trickle down economics (!), you name it they've tried it. And it never works out for the rest of us.

GOP shenanigans are an argument to stop fukking voting for the GOP, not to just privative everything. We already know that once certain services are privatized then quality goes down because the focus is on squeezing everything for that last dollar.
 

Gus Money

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,537
Reputation
1,551
Daps
30,540
Democrats are the Party of Fiscal Responsibility
Over the past year, we have seen a repeat of long-standing Republican fiscal and economic policies: Republicans have passed a deep tax cut, overwhelmingly benefitting corporations and wealthier Americans; the deficit, predictably, has soared; and Republicans have pointed to the deficits they have created as justification for cutting spending on programs vital to American families, including Social Security and Medicare. This three-step plan is not new. Proponents of the 1981 Reagan tax cuts called it “starving the beast.” Similarly, the results are not new. This is the third time in recent decades that Republicans have passed deep tax cuts for the wealthy that led to markedly higher budget deficits.

Democrats have taken a very different fiscal approach. Democratic Congresses and Presidents have presided over eras of deficit reduction and even balanced budgets, and Democrats have pushed to require Congress to pay for major new initiatives. While Republicans’ main approach to federal budget deficits is to simultaneously create and complain about them, Democrats have actually done something about them.

Differing Approaches Produce Differing Results
It should be no surprise that these different approaches to fiscal responsibility have had different results. While economic ups and downs and other factors also affect the federal budget, the pattern is clear. Republican control of Congress and the White House beginning in 2001 was followed by an immediate revival of the budget deficit. In contrast, after Democrats retook control in 2009, the deficit fell steadily, dropping from $1.4 trillion that year to $438 billion by 2015.

Now that Congress and the White House are once again under unified Republican control, Republicans have resumed their fiscally irresponsible policies. Last year, they enacted a set of tax cuts that have sent the deficit soaring, resulting in trillion-dollar deficits yet again. CBO has estimated that the GOP tax law will cost about $2 trillion over ten years (approaching $3 trillion under GOP plans to extend parts of it). It is no surprise that CBO now projects that the deficit will be nearly $1 trillion next year and exceed that level in 2020 and for the foreseeable future.
The GOP been messing up the money for decades.
 

ColdSlither

Extensive Enterprises
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2018
Messages
7,347
Reputation
1,134
Daps
27,098
Reppin
Elizabeth, NJ by way of East Orange
How is a 4 billion dollar annual loss a strain? How is 100 billion dollars in unfunded pensions a strain? :what: Money really does grow on trees to liberals...

The Netherlands has fully privatized mail, Germany i believe has privatized there mail system as well.:pachaha:I'm going to use the "its working fine over there" argument single payers love. Why cant it work here?





I'll concede
privatizing does mean profits... I know how evil that is.
Some one will make money for providing this service...:francis:

It's not going to work here because we're not The Netherlands or Germany. For the record, I'm not against privatizing the mail system. I do think it's one of the thing that the government should be responsible for, but it can work if privatized. It does work in those countries. I'm not against privatizing our rail system. It works in Japan, and it's not expensive at all, and profitable. I just don't trust that the right thing would be done in this country, and that it would pretty much become a luxury service.
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,157
Reputation
3,747
Daps
110,191
Reppin
דעת
Its literally occurring overseas as we speak...:francis:



There seems to be this idea floating around the HL left that the Republican party isnt part of our govt.:patrice: If i say "govt program A is inefficient and/or unsustainable" the response is "its the GoP"... as if that makes my statement false.
As long as its public its subject to political fukkery.
GoP shenanigans are an argument for privatizing.
So because the Republicans are bad at governing, don't be better, just privatize it?

1hWc.gif
 

Gus Money

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
6,537
Reputation
1,551
Daps
30,540
Cause it would save tax payer money.
Top twelve things you should know | Postal Facts - U.S. Postal Service
The Postal Service receives NO tax dollars for operating expenses and relies on the sale of postage, products and services to fund its operations.
Coronavirus Is Threatening One of Government’s Steadiest Services: The Mail
An independent executive agency, the Postal Service has not taken federal funding in decades, running instead off revenue raised from stamps and other postal products.
:pachaha:

If taxpayer money is bailing out irresponsible corporations then it should be used to support a government agency that provides a key service to all Americans.
 
Last edited:

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,157
Reputation
3,747
Daps
110,191
Reppin
דעת
Purposely bad. They govern badly to provide a reason for privatization. The USPS itself is not causing its problems.
Masters of self-sabotage and creating problems to later pat themselves on the back for fixing. Trump tax cuts, sole purpose is to later come back and justify the reduction of Medicaid and Medicare because they couldn't get it done through normal means.
 

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,404
Reputation
2,481
Daps
47,594
Reppin
.0001%
:bryan:

It's deeper than your surface level "government programs are inefficient" analysis because the government as a whole isn't to blame. The GOP constantly goes out of its way to shyt on government programs that are proven to help people in favor of propping up corporations and the rich.

The party of fiscal responsibility is ALWAYS fukking up the money. Tax cuts, corporate welfare for the rich, defunding key social programs, trickle down economics (!), you name it they've tried it. And it never works out for the rest of us.

GOP shenanigans are an argument to stop fukking voting for the GOP, not to just privative everything. We already know that once certain services are privatized then quality goes down because the focus is on squeezing everything for that last dollar.

:wow:



time for yall to stop entertaining dead7's cato crap :pachaha:
 
Top