USDA cuts Land-grant HBCU scholarship program

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,619
Reputation
4,882
Daps
84,301
Reppin
The Arsenal
I would like to see the same pushback AIPAC would do if their interests are not meet. :manny: It's an example so don't turn around and say the make up of both organizations are different. Like I said in another post. There is no defense from the very people who were elected and emphasized a specific niche. Just sitting back and watching.
do you know how AIPAC pushes back? they aren't elected officials. they have used money to buy influence and leverage and that's why the israel/palestine issue is so one sided and settled, because the jews have spent the money required to buy both parties on this issue that doesn't personally affect the vast majority of these elected officials' constituents.

what's the black version of AIPAC and how much money is behind it?

next you'll say they could pushback like elon musk (threaten to primary them) if republicans get in his way.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
54,151
Reputation
14,790
Daps
203,194
Reppin
Above the fray.
I would like to see the same pushback AIPAC would do if their interests are not meet. :manny: It's an example so don't turn around and say the make up of both organizations are different. Like I said in another post. There is no defense from the very people who were elected and emphasized a specific niche. Just sitting back and watching.

The CBC is a caucus of elected officials, AIPAC is a lobbying group funded by wealthy jews.

As a lobbying group with a HUGE budget, Aipac exerts pressure by donating money to get officials to vote their way or cutting donations and funding a challenger for that member's seat.
They have leverage over the amount of Yes/No votes that bills get.

Again, the CBC's leverage is based on the makeup of Congress and the power/relationships their members have in Congress.

So, will ask the question again. CBC can't do what aipac does, so what would you want to see them do to pusback against executive orders and decisions by heads of Fed agencies?
 
Joined
Jan 19, 2017
Messages
35,557
Reputation
-327
Daps
87,115
But then you have this dude @Bunchy Carter clapping like a seal over some trinkets

file-20200120-118319-yw3uzm.jpg


Bhahshshahshcahha
 

Uachet

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 25, 2022
Messages
5,872
Reputation
4,579
Daps
34,207
Reppin
Black Self-Sufficiency
According to #bothsiders, this is good because the HBCU scholarships only benefited white women anyway.
No one ever made that assertion. This is the problem with some of you and your nonsensical arguments. Try sticking to what is actualy fact, instead of running into the realm of hyperbole over and over again.

You don't help your position by pushing up lies as the truth.
 

OperationNumbNutts

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
7,010
Reputation
816
Daps
20,473
The CBC is a caucus of elected officials, AIPAC is a lobbying group funded by wealthy jews.

As a lobbying group with a HUGE budget, Aipac exerts pressure by donating money to get officials to vote their way or cutting donations and funding a challenger for that member's seat.
They have leverage over the amount of Yes/No votes that bills get.

Again, the CBC's leverage is based on the makeup of Congress and the power/relationships their members have in Congress.

So, will ask the question again. CBC can't do what aipac does, so what would you want to see them do to pusback against executive orders and decisions by heads of Fed agencies?
I clearly stated it was an example and you turned around and made it literal. I am well aware of the differences between the two groups. At the end of the day, CBC and Dems always have excuses why they can't do something and people blindly follow it. If that's how you want to function, so be it. There is a reason why Dems got their a$$es kicked the way they did last election and it goes beyond Trump. To answer your question, there's no point especially when my example was clear.
 

OperationNumbNutts

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
7,010
Reputation
816
Daps
20,473
do you know how AIPAC pushes back? they aren't elected officials. they have used money to buy influence and leverage and that's why the israel/palestine issue is so one sided and settled, because the jews have spent the money required to buy both parties on this issue that doesn't personally affect the vast majority of these elected officials' constituents.

what's the black version of AIPAC and how much money is behind it?

next you'll say they could pushback like elon musk (threaten to primary them) if republicans get in his way.
Wrong. Like I said in another post. There's always an excuse and people are content with it. Issues impacting blacks are being bulldozered and people are supporting elected officials make excuses or letting people make excuses for them.
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
54,151
Reputation
14,790
Daps
203,194
Reppin
Above the fray.
* the backlash and pressure got the USDA to clarify and issue statement about the status of the current scholarship holders.




CBC calls Trump suspension of USDA 1890 Scholars program ‘outrageous’​


02/21/25

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) is calling on President Trump to reinstate an education program designed to support students from rural and underserved communities pursuing degrees in agriculture and related fields at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs).
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) indefinitely suspended the 1890 Scholarship Program on Thursday. According to the USDA’s website, the program is “pending further review.”
“The Trump Administration’s decision to suspend the 1890 Scholars Program ‘pending further review’ is an outrageous disruption that undermines efforts to make higher education accessible for Black students and correct our nation’s history of systemic racial discrimination within the land-grant system,” said Rep. Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.), chair of the CBC, on Friday.

“President Trump repeatedly promised the American people that he would work to lower the costs of living and create greater access to economic opportunity, including for Black communities,” she continued. “Since January 20th, 2025 this administration has been on a cruel rampage, showing us every day that hard working Americans are not their priority. Instead of working to make our lives better, the Trump administration continues to try to take our country backward.”

The USDA did not immediately respond to The Hill’s request for comment, but the Trump administration has issued a multitude of executive orders rolling back federal diversity, equity and inclusion efforts.
The program, established in 1992, provides full tuition, room and board to students pursuing degrees in agriculture, food, natural resource sciences or related fields.

Last year, more than $19 million was allocated to 94 students across 19 HBCUs participating in the program.
Applications for the program close March 1, and the CBC is calling on Trump to reinstate the program ahead of the deadline.
“For decades, this program has been vital to the success of the agriculture industry, and CBC has championed this historic and bipartisan program to open doors to talented students from underserved communities,” Clarke said.
Members of the CBC have expressed outrage over the suspension, warning of the outsized impact the pause will have on Black students seeking to enter the agricultural field.
Rep. Alma Adams (D-N.C.) called the suspension a “clear attack on an invaluable program” making higher education accessible.

“This program is a correction to a long history of racial discrimination within the land-grant system, not an example of it,” said Adams, adding the suspension is “targeted and mean-spirited.”
Rep. Shontel Brown (D-Ohio) added that the move is “another egregious attack on fairness and opportunity” from Trump’s administration.
“Freezing a scholarship program for students from rural and underserved communities to study agriculture punishes talented students and hurts our future,” said Brown.

USDA said students in the program would be able to complete it.
“To be clear, every scholar — over 300 — regardless of matriculation date, was retained to finish their studies and complete their work with the Department. In line with President Trump’s directive, USDA is optimizing operations and strengthening its ability to serve farmers, ranchers, and the agriculture community. Like other programs within the Department, Secretary Rollins will continue to review the 1890 National Scholars Program, its mission, and its metrics to ensure the most efficient use of taxpayer resources,” a USDA spokesperson told The Hill.
 

Scaaar

Superstar
Joined
Mar 19, 2017
Messages
3,984
Reputation
764
Daps
16,022
According to #bothsiders, this is good because the HBCU scholarships only benefited white women anyway.
I see that's their new messaging now. They disappeared for a few weeks to figure out to respond and that's all they came up with ...smh
 

get these nets

Veteran
Joined
Jul 8, 2017
Messages
54,151
Reputation
14,790
Daps
203,194
Reppin
Above the fray.
I can say from personal experience this scholarship helped ALOT of brehs/brehettes that attended HBCUs in the government.

Basically a free ride in college and the 4 years you work in the government, you move up to a GS-12 by the end (currently $99,200 salary in the DMV area)

:wow:

They've been trying to get rid of it for a min too...very sad

Yeah maga is bad news for everybody, especially Black people. Trump's actions made that clear within the 1st month in office.

People within the govt and that dept. who didnt want that pipeline to exist will get their wish.
 
Top