and if vinces wwe champ loses to some bum. it tarnishes his belt forever. not worth it.Ok, imagine this is true and the no compete sections of the contracts are the main disputes.
Now imagine Brock signs a new contract that allows him to compete in UFC, he then wins at Mania and then eventually wins the UFC title while being WWE Champ....
Which one is the more lucrative scenario?
Vince should start learning to take advantage of the independent contract status of his workers. If these workers work for WWE AND are successful in more mainstream endeavors it translates to MORE business for Vince. He needs to let go of his death grip on talent and allow them to make him more money. Like Punk said, he's a millionaire that should be a billionaire
and if vinces wwe champ loses to some bum. it tarnishes his belt forever. not worth it.
The pure fukkery if Lesnar just straight up didn't show up for Mania
Brock ending the streak wasn't about giving Brock the rub, it was about giving the rub to the person who beats Brockgive The Streak to somebody who doesn't care about wrestling, brehs
People bashed punk too soThe hypocrisy of wrestling fans is ridiculous.
Brock walks out on Raw when he's scheduled to appear and it's "LULZ Brock owns McMahon" and people coming up with far-fetched scenarios to keep Brock happy.
Meanwhile Rock didn't make it to every show because he had prior commitments, but always did business the right way. Yet people were bashing him every chance they got and were praying he went away.
I wonder why that is
That noncompete is a joke , vince better settle down before the whole idea of independent contractors as the wwe uses itIf he does try to hit him with that non compete clause he may have to be forced to leave and eat that lawsuit
The fukkery of that would be astronomical