update: More victims come out. Tag @bigboss, it's OVER, brehs. :snoop: | BREAKING! Jonothan Majors cleared of all wrongdoing by his PAWG! She recants!

[Still Benefited]

But that’s only if you read into it what you want.

It also reads like an apologetic partner feeing bad for her part in a night that went bad.

She’d have no reason to “cover for her abuser” in texts directly to him.

This.

Where I will agree with the others posters is,this text isnt the "recanting" statement people were expecting.


So all the people you silenced when they heard she recanted. And all the people who moved on to something else. All you did was bring them back into the fold to start arguing and dirtying his name in social media again. But I dont think the text actually make him look any more guilty than before. The text simply took you back to where you were before you said she recanted. When people hear recanted they assume she wrote an official statement to police,or a letter to the lawyer stating she wasnt abused and nothing happened. But the text has everything a recantment would have. It just unfortunately also has enough buzzwords to give the peanut gallery ammo



If you know your video evidence is strong,you dont care how the public reacts to these text though. You already know they will bend their knee,and you will be exhonerated.

 

[DaddyFresh]

His defense team goal is to keep him out of jail. Some people will never let this go no matter what. The texts show that the alleged “victim” is on his side.

That may fool some juveniles. But thats usually how domestic violence goes

 

[Rekkapryde]

But then that leaves no room for a person to be not an abuser.

What would textbook not covering for an abuser look like?

Again these texts are directly to him. She’d have no reason to lie to HIM about whether he attacked her or not.

I know what you are saying, but It's a dirty game breh. When the accuser lies, they still get off with no harm no foul. But the accused still has that stain on them.

In this case, Even in the text directly between them, this happens all the time with DV situations. It's not some one off. Victim apologizes when the abuser gets locked up or arrested and makes excuses and blames themselves for getting the abuser getting in trouble.

Your argument is she's being sincere, which I think she is too. Problem is what I described is more the norm (victims covering for their abuser blaming themselves).

 

[Bumblebreh]

This.

Where I will agree with the others posters is,this text isnt the "recanting" statement people were expecting.


So all the people you silenced when they heard she recanted. And all the people who moved on to something else. All you did was bring them back into the fold to start arguing and dirtying his name in social media again. But I dont think the text actually make him look any more guilty than before. The text simply took you back to where you were before you said she recanted. When people hear recanted they assume she wrote an official statement to police,or a letter to the lawyer stating she wasnt abused and nothing happened. But the text has everything a recantment would have. It just unfortunately also has enough buzzwords to give the peanut gallery ammo



If you know your video evidence is strong,you dont care how the public reacts to these text though. You already know they will bend their knee,and you will be exhonerated.

His best defence video would be the cab footage that proves his innocence. Not some text, the text messages was a bad move and now the allegations are trending.

 

[Rekkapryde]

His best defence video would be the cab footage that proves his innocence. Not some text, the text messages was a bad move and now the allegations are trending.

exactly.

the video should have been dropped, not the text.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

This.

Where I will agree with the others posters is,this text isnt the "recanting" statement people were expecting.


So all the people you silenced when they heard she recanted. And all the people who moved on to something else. All you did was bring them back into the fold to start arguing and dirtying his name in social media again. But I dont think the text actually make him look any more guilty than before. The text simply took you back to where you were before you said she recanted. When people hear recanted they assume she wrote an official statement to police,or a letter to the lawyer stating she wasnt abused and nothing happened. But the text has everything a recantment would have. It just unfortunately also has enough buzzwords to give the peanut gallery ammo



If you know your video evidence is strong,you dont care how the public reacts to these text though. You already know they will bend their knee,and you will be exhonerated.

This isn’t the recant the lawyer was talking about those were submitted to a judge. These are just texts from her to him after the event.

Peoples problem is they don’t know how to digest the info they receive. Just knee jerk reactions to hype and half truths.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

I know what you are saying, but It's a dirty game breh. When the accuser lies, they still get off with no harm no foul. But the accused still has that stain on them.

In this case, Even in the text directly between them, this happens all the time with DV situations. It's not some one off. Victim apologizes when the abuser gets locked up or arrested and makes excuses and blames themselves for getting the abuser getting in trouble.

Your argument is she's being sincere, which I think she is too. Problem is what I described is more the norm (victims covering for their abuser blaming themselves).

Devoid of any other evidence or history of issues like this for him, i think overall people will give him the BOD.

 

[Rekkapryde]

Devoid of any other evidence or history of issues like this for him, i think overall people will give him the BOD.

he's a muscular famous black dude vs a frail looking white woman.

even with him being the one who called the cops, if they see any hint of her having anything looking like a bruise, he getting arrested and that's what happened. her apologizing after the fact due to her overreacting doesn't do anything for the optics of him being arrested.

Men, especially black men, don't get the BOD fam in these situations. You know this.


The VIDEO, not TEXTS, should have been dropped by the lawyer or thru TMZ. That would have been the smarter play.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

That may fool some juveniles. But thats usually how domestic violence goes

Then there’s no such thing as a not abuser.

If victims say they are not victims
and
Not Victims say they are not Victims

Then how do we deduce who’s not an abuser??

 

[Still Benefited]

This isn’t the recant the lawyer was talking about those were submitted to a judge. These are just texts from her to him after the event.

Peoples problem is they don’t know how to digest the info they receive. Just knee jerk reactions to hype and half truths.

Oh okay,so this isnt the "recant". Still think it unneccessarily gets reactionary people talking about it,and making it trend again. Without actually being a nail in the coffin for enough people. For reasonable people yes,but not for the large portion who would love to continue the drama and storyline.

 

[MeachTheMonster]

he's a muscular famous black dude vs a frail looking white woman.

even with him being the one who called the cops, if they see any hint of her having anything looking like a bruise, he getting arrested and that's what happened. her apologizing after the fact due to her overreacting doesn't do anything for the optics of him being arrested.

Men, especially black men, don't get the BOD fam in these situations. You know this.


The VIDEO, not TEXTS, should have been dropped by the lawyer or thru TMZ. That would have been the smarter play.

All he gotta do is bring that white woman to the next red carpet event all will be forgotten

I’m sure there’s a legal reason the tape isn’t public yet. Best believe if he was kicking her ass on it TMZ would already have it. They woulda got that from the cab driver first.

 

[Rekkapryde]

Then there’s no such thing as a not abuser.

If victims say they are not victims
and
Not Victims say they are not Victims

Then how do we deduce who’s not an abuser??

police are going to error on the side of safety first in DV situations and usually arrest the alleged abuser first. Once the abused recants or they don't have enough to keep the alleged abuser locked up, they are let go (like Majors was). If she had bad bruises, he'd still be locked up. So yeah, I don't think he did anything heinous.

All he gotta do is bring that white woman to the next red carpet event all will be forgotten

I’m sure there’s a legal reason the tape isn’t public yet. Best believe if he was kicking her ass on it TMZ would already have it. They woulda got that from the cab driver first.

Sadly, there are always going to be those who think he did something unless that video is made public. It fukkin sucks. It is interesting that TMZ hasn't gotten the tape yet.....or worse, they are holding it and will leak it before the cops officially do. Nothing would shock me if Harvey pulled that kinda stunt.

 

[Still Benefited]

His best defence video would be the cab footage that proves his innocence. Not some text, the text messages was a bad move and now the allegations are trending.

Agree. But some of you need to take your lawyer and p.r caps off for a second. Stop thinking about what OTHER people MIGHT think about. Knowing what you know,shouldnt these text essentially end this? She admits he called because she collapsed,and he was worried. Admitted she didnt want him to get arrested and wasnt strangled like some of the stories mentioned. Basically admitting the cops tried to get her to say more happened then did.




The more yall think on others behalf,you just fuel the belief in his guilt. By saying things like "this makes him look bad". It would be more helpful if you state the fact these text seem to clear his name. If thats what you actually think.


Becsuse you have people saying "I dont think he did it,but these text make him look bad". Well thats not supportive or helpful at all. If your worried about the court of public opinion,help the brotha out

 

[Nabs]

"I told them it was my fault for trying to grab your phone."

This is just such a bad line without any context. The lawyer throwing this out there without video backup is wild to me. So many women identify with this.

 

[Neo. The Only. The One.]

Imagine your girl get mad at you and tell you she calling the police, and you sitting there like "call the police for what? I ain't did nothing to you "

Then she says "You beat me "

And you say, "No I didn't! The hell are you talking about! "

Then she proceeds to hit you with the and starts throwing herself through tables and running into walls like this

Brehs, it would be over