Ya the fact that there is video evidence that she was lying...this clearly isn't a case of "oh he paid her off" she tried to ruin him.Good for him! Hope he doesn’t deal with her anymore.
Ya the fact that there is video evidence that she was lying...this clearly isn't a case of "oh he paid her off" she tried to ruin him.Good for him! Hope he doesn’t deal with her anymore.
But that’s only if you read into it what you want.
It also reads like an apologetic partner feeing bad for her part in a night that went bad.
She’d have no reason to “cover for her abuser” in texts directly to him.
We'll see if the lawyer's submitted video and witness testimony ends this shyt. But even then, the DA and State could still press on if they want to.I don't wanna read shyt from these idiot conspiracy theorists on here. What has actually happened? Is it over or what?
Perhaps but if homie really closted fist hit her he could've killed her.It def means a fist fight because police said she has bruises.
Dude ruined his life over a low budget Uma Thurman
Perhaps but if homie really closted fist hit her he could've killed her.
The police would've pulled video themselves from the Bar the apartment and the Uber.if his lawyers gave the police video of him Mike Tyson'ing her ass
The police would've pulled video themselves from the Bar the apartment and the Uber.
“Majority” are stupidMajority are reading it like that for a reason tho. It makes more sense in context understanding that his lawyer submitted the video evidence and witness testimony of their fight in the car.
But without that knowledge, it's going to look like a DV victim covering for her accuser to the vast majority of people and that's exactly what's happening because of textbook DV violence history of most victims covering for the person beating them.
Is it 100% of the time? Absolutely not because there are definitely situations out there where women lie or exaggerate/fabricate, but those are more the exception than the rule.
“Majority” are stupid
If you don’t take in the full context you don’t deserve to have an opinion.
What?? Don't understand basic Police investigation prcedures brehs.
But then that leaves no room for a person to be not an abuser.it's DV history that people are riding with...and for good reason.
Countless women make excuses for and recant statements to protect their abuser...some only to get knocked upside the head again or worse.
Do I think she's being seriously contrite considering what else it out there? Yes, I do.
But the texts alone look like textbook covering for your abuser which is why it was dumb of the lawyer to leak that.
The bar is higher. Yea. But that’s why you don’t hit your partner.But then that leaves no room for a person to be not an abuser.
What would textbook not covering for an abuser look like?
Again these texts are directly to him. She’d have no reason to lie to HIM about whether he attacked her or not.