Unanswered Questions about the Boston Incident

[daze23]

It's to establish if this is standard protocol. If they are present at all major events, then them being there should not be an issue and the tinfoils can chill out.

Also, I just paid 7 stacks in federal taxes; I think any taxpayer has a right to know if our government is using private security companies with taxpayer money at national public events. If they were government ops I wouldn't have this question.

they're 2 dudes with similar clothes on. anything more is speculation. and if they were some kinda secret-whatever, why would you expect anyone to be forthcoming about what they were doing?

Not the fact that he survived the shootout, but the fact he was able to get away. I've rarely heard of anyone getting away from a crime scene once the helicopters come out. Where was the thermal scanner during the Thursday night shooting?

they used thermal imaging to check out a specific location (the boat). it's a major metropolitan area with millions of heat signatures. it's also a major metropolitan area with millions of places to hide. it's like trying to find a needle in a haystack. and ultimately they found his ass

 

[badvillain]

they're 2 dudes with similar clothes on. anything more is speculation. and if they were some kinda secret-whatever, why would you expect anyone to be forthcoming about what they were doing?

Breh they aren't that secret; from the pics online it's pretty hard to deny that these guys weren't from Craft International. And it was more than two. There should be no issue with the government confirming or denying this.

they used thermal imaging to check out a specific location (the boat). it's a major metropolitan area with millions of heat signatures. it's also a major metropolitan area with millions of places to hide. it's like trying to find a needle in a haystack. and ultimately they found his ass

Fair enough. I just find it interesting they weren't able to apprehend him during Thursday night.

 

[daze23]

Breh they aren't that secret; from the pics online it's pretty hard to deny that these guys weren't from Craft International. And it was more than two. There should be no issue with the government confirming or denying this.

you can't expect someone to say something just because you think there's no reason not to (that leaves the door open to basically expect them to say an infinite amount of things). you have to have a good reason for them to confirm or deny it. interweb detective theories is not a good enough reason, at least as far the gub'ment is concerned

 

[Rapmastermind]

So you guys are cool with the government being able to just go in everyone houses and violate the 4th Amendment just cause they say an alleged "Terrorist" is on the loose? This really set a bad precedent to me.

 

[badvillain]

you can't expect someone to say something just because you think there's no reason not to. you have to have a good reason for them to confirm or deny it. interweb detective theories is not a good enough reason, at least as far the gub'ment is concerned

Do you not understand the train of thought here? The first reason not even related to these acts has to do with the use of taxpayer money, using a PRIVATE security company needs explanation period; if they were government ops it would not be an issue, but outsourcing our security at major public events needs to be addressed pointblank.

On top of that, if it isn't standard protocol for them to be there then we need to visit why they were there and for what reason they were contracted in the first place. If the fbi came forward and said this has been going on for years and cited other events, then it would calm a lot of this speculation down.

Their logos and pics have already been plastered on the net, there is no secret. So we have a right to some transparency from our government.

 

[daze23]

Do you not understand the train of thought here? The first reason not even related to these acts has to do with the use of taxpayer money, using a PRIVATE security company needs explanation period; if they were government ops it would not be an issue, but outsourcing our security at major public events needs to be addressed pointblank.

On top of that, if it isn't standard protocol for them to be there then we need to visit why they were there and for what reason they were contracted in the first place. If the fbi came forward and said this has been going on for years and cited other events, then it would calm a lot of this speculation down.

Their logos and pics have already been plastered on the net, there is no secret. So we have a right to some transparency from our government.

how many agencies do you think are involved in the security at the Boston Marathon? (an event that draws around 500,000 spectators, and 20,000 runners)

like most things these days, it's also corporate sponsored. out of corporate sponsors, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, the city of Boston (and surrounding cities the marathon goes through), and the Feds, I wouldn't assume much about where the money came from

and if you concede that your question just has to do with tax dollars, and not this incident, then it's not really relevant to this thread. nor would that be the beginning or end of a discussion about the government's openness about how it uses tax dollars

 

[Dr. Sebi Jr.]

1. Why Boston and why a Marathon?

JEWS.

2. According to Eye-Witnesses...there was a unbelievable amount of security at a Running Marathon...why was security so beefed up during a run?

JEWS.

3. Again According to Eye-Witnesses there were bomb-sniffing dogs and announcements of drills, so why isn't the media focusing on getting info on the Eye-Witness accounts?

JEWS.

4. Why did the Boston Globe Twitter feed address that the bomb squad was dealing with a controlled explosion on Boyltson Street 8m after the 2 explosions went off when police reported there were no more explosions or devices found after the 2 blast?

JEWS.

5. Why were the original suspects from the pictures wearing the same clothes( tim boots, cargo pants and black hats) quickly dismissed as false reporting?

JEWS.

6. Why were these men on the phone at the same time looking in the same direction?

JEWS.

7. Why was one of them wearing a hat with the logo of Craft International which Seal Team 3 and Seal Team 5 have on their hats?...and no it's not the Punisher's logo. Why were they closer to the first bomb site than the supposed new suspects?

JEWS.

8. When the news media changed the suspects to other suspects why were new suspects named changed to newer suspects?

JEWS.

9. Why would a talented fighter from Russia, now U.S. Citizen ruin his chances of being a contender for Golden Gloves in Utah by doing this? In the MMA article he would be selected to be in the Olympics and fight for the U.S. ( which he wants). The younger Tsarnaev brother did wrestling at the highschool and trained at the same MMA school his older brother did. Does this seem odd here?

JEWS.

10. Why would the Military take over the Police Scanners during the live news feed of the building stand-off and the suspect was announced not to be there after that happened?

JEWS.

11. Why was there Martial Law in Boston shutting down stores, places of travel and everyone had to stay inside?

JEWS.

12. Why did the FBI have surveillance on the Tsarnaev brother for years until Monday?

JEWS.

Anyone WHO disagrees WITH my analysis of this Cauctastrophe IS a GOVERNMENT AGENT. Knowledge is POWER.

 

[thekingsmen]

quick psa:

kingsmen's gonna piss and moan and play victim and call people trolls when they don't ride with him in this thread.

You can disagree but have a reason to disagree with my views, not just come into a thread and troll away. This is why many of you don't post threads.


and the reason a lot of people aren't gonna ride with him is because this thread is bullshyt. it's him "asking questions" (aka passive aggressively suggesting something ominous about each detail) under the guise of being "open-minded", when in actuality, he came to a conclusion about what reallyhappened about 26 seconds after he heard of the bombing. now he's trying to piece things together to fit his conclusion, which i can only assume has something do with a secret government plot.

Condescending tones likes this proves prop can't answer questions so he complains about me complaining. Sounds like a bytch gossiping to other bytches about who they don't like. The thread is bull yet the bullshytters are in my thread wining and crying.... Answer the questions or leave.



so if you have an answer to any of questions he posed, he's gonna fight you tooth and nail on it unless it works with his conspiracy theory.

You still crying or you going to answer.

 

[thekingsmen]

There's a difference between asking good and logical questions and ridiculous conspiracy theory-ridden questions that have very simple answers. There is no smoking gun here, there has not been a single question asked by anyone that makes any sort of sense. Meanwhile, important questions, like what are the implications of this guy not being read his Miranda rights (not as serious as some think, but it's a legitimate question) are being tossed aside for this insidious nonsense. You mistake asking questions for the sake of asking questions with asking reasonable questions, and I saw you throw in the Iraq war example. The questions about that war were known at the time of the war, people just went against their judgment and didn't ask out of fear, but there were questions being raised by the UN and many people. This isn't first grade, there is such a thing as a stupid question.

Unfortunately not one good or logical question comes out your mouth. Stick to being a Troll Mod instead of claiming everything people mention in threads about Currents Events or questionable events...nutjobs while the Atheists can troll into religion threads and bash people.

 

[Blackking]

Unfortunately not one good or logical question comes out your mouth. Stick to being a Troll Mod instead of claiming everything people mention in threads about Currents Events or questionable events...nutjobs while the Atheists can troll into religion threads and bash people.

coming in here and having Any questions, legitimate or not is wrong.. your in the wrong place. This is HL. That would be like asking questions about Kennedy's assassination decades ago. Or it would be like claiming, back in the 70's that the government had brain manipulation programs...

These are the type of people who only question after the fact. Then they become the cool ones who knew all along. They see nothing wrong with the official story.... with any official story.

So basically to answer your questions.. the older brother went back home, join an islamic terrorist group... turn the younger one from a normal kid to a mass murderer.... they bombed some sh1t got chased around, ... older was killed,.... Younger was shot (go figure) IN THE throat, Boston is strong and resilient, America needs more cameras and big brother.. more security measures to prevent sh1t like that.

the media and government has never manipulated us... not even a lil bit.

 

[Rapmastermind]

*FBI knew of one of the brothers for years
*There was private security who was where the bomb was before it went off only to be safely away from it on the other side of it once it went off.
*A Saudi Arabian man is getting deported cause of National Security who just happen to be at the bomb site.
*The Brother the FBI has known about is conviently dead so he can't talk. The younger brother throat is conviently damaged so he can't talk.
*Boston PD violated people's 4th Amendment and used Martial Law to search people's houses for 1 suspect.


Again this official story has so many holes it's pathetic. But go ahead keep believing this "Official Story" that keeps changing day by day.