Unanswered Questions about the Boston Incident

[daze23]

The word was put out on a national scale more now than ever before. People can now researched the history of it with information being more fluid in the technological age. I think that's positive cause some people seem to convince themselves that the government would never do anything shady like that.

FOX NEWS ADMIT FBI HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN 17 FALSE FLAG TERROR NON-EVENTS - YouTube

as your link shows, there's nothing new about claiming everything is a "false flag"

if I had a nickel for everytime Alex Jones said "false flag"... well I'd probably only have like $50, but that's a lot of nickels

 

[Colilluminati]

breh 15 officers were hospitlized due to these

That's wild.Link?News kept saying no one was hurt then they bumped it to 1 now your saying 15.I need a link breh breh.

 

[Rapmastermind]

There's a difference between asking good and logical questions and ridiculous conspiracy theory-ridden questions that have very simple answers. There is no smoking gun here, there has not been a single question asked by anyone that makes any sort of sense. Meanwhile, important questions, like what are the implications of this guy not being read his Miranda rights (not as serious as some think, but it's a legitimate question) are being tossed aside for this insidious nonsense. You mistake asking questions for the sake of asking questions with asking reasonable questions, and I saw you throw in the Iraq war example. The questions about that war were known at the time of the war, people just went against their judgment and didn't ask out of fear, but there were questions being raised by the UN and many people. This isn't first grade, there is such a thing as a stupid question.

"There's no smoking gun here"? All the information isn't even out yet to say if there's a smoking gun or not it's still early. Also who determines what's a "Reasonable" question and what isn't? I think it is reasonable to wonder about certain things from this including the Miranda rights issues you raised. Also I mentioned Iraq cause the media and government mostly fell in line and the hard questions weren't asked. I know there were people against it at the time cause I was. I do remember vividly like you said cause of fear how many people fell in line instead of questioning the validity of what the government was saying.

My main point is more people fall in line with whatever the government says instead of asking hard questions to get to the truth. Maybe if they did that we wouldn't of gone to Iraq. Maybe if they did that JFK and MLK cases wouldn't of taken years to solve. It's easy to brush someone questioning the government off as a Conspiracy Theorist instead of looking for the truth of the matter cause it's always harder to find the truth.

A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes. - Mark Twain

 

[KushSkywalker]

That's wild.Link?News kept saying no one was hurt then they bumped it to 1 now your saying 15.I need a link breh breh.

The boston PD said this last night in the closing press conference.

15 officers suffered injuries in pursuit of the brothers from explosives being thrown out the window. I watched him say it live with my own eyes. I'll see if I can find a link.

He also said all 15 injuries were minor and that they had all been released by the time of the press conference. Let me see if I can find it online.

 

[daze23]

That's wild.Link?News kept saying no one was hurt then they bumped it to 1 now your saying 15.I need a link breh breh.

one officer killed. one critically wounded. 15 injured

that's just off the top of my head, as someone that was paying attention

 

[dennis roadman]

quick psa:

kingsmen's gonna piss and moan and play victim and call people trolls when they don't ride with him in this thread.

and the reason a lot of people aren't gonna ride with him is because this thread is bullshyt. it's him "asking questions" (aka passive aggressively suggesting something ominous about each detail) under the guise of being "open-minded", when in actuality, he came to a conclusion about what reallyhappened about 26 seconds after he heard of the bombing. now he's trying to piece things together to fit his conclusion, which i can only assume has something do with a secret government plot.

so if you have an answer to any of questions he posed, he's gonna fight you tooth and nail on it unless it works with his conspiracy theory.

pretty much

the worst part of this thread is that there are things actually worth being upset about, but tinfoilers have to push through with empty points that "obviously" point to a huge cover up that will soon have us all getting gay married by SWAT policemen in gitmo

like this for example: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev and Miranda Rights: The public safety exception and terrorism cases. - Slate Magazine

 

[Colilluminati]

one officer killed. one critically wounded. 15 injured

that's just off the top of my head, as someone that was paying attention

LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) -- The two suspects in the Boston Marathon bombing threw a grenade and five pipe bombs at police during a chase involving a carjacked vehicle, CNN reported Friday afternoon. The grenade and three of the pipe bombs detonated, according to CNN. CNN also said Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, the 19-year-old suspect still at large, backed the carjacked Mercedes SUV over his 26-year-old brother, Tamerlan, at one point. It was unclear whether that was what killed Tamerlan Tsarnaev. It also was unknown whether the grenade and pipe bombs caused any injuries.

I'm just asking for a link.I'm not wearing tinfoil and calling this a false flag just asking for a link.

 

[daze23]

I'm just asking for a link.I'm not wearing tinfoil and calling this a false flag just asking for a link.

It also was unknown whether the grenade and pipe bombs caused any injuries.

I agree that we can't say that those 15 were necessarily injured by the bombs. but I heard the "15 officers injured" stat a few times. with all the shootouts and crazyness, I'm sure there were a few different causes of those injuries

 

[jwinfield]

the shooting at the dark knight returns, 9/11, sandy hook, the boston bombings, and the boston shootout/capture all false flags :smugobama:

Don't forget Dorner. The government did it so they can use drones on US citizens.

 

[badvillain]

I like to consider myself open-minded and logical, but not a conspiracy theorist. While I do not find it unbelievable that a CIA/State sponsored terror event is possible, I believe we are all good in nature and wouldn't be able to believe that without substantial evidence.

At the same time, I have a couple questions I wish the media would ask the FBI:

- Can we get confirmation if those undercover ops were from a privately commissioned security company? If they were, it means they had to be contracted; and who in our government contracted and authorized these men being there? And in the past, how many other events have they been present at?

- How was it possible that a wounded 19 year old with no military training was able to survive a shootout with hundreds of local, state and federal police and lead a manhunt that turned a city into a ghosttown?

- If the older brother was on their radar and was interviewed over 2 years ago how was his recent activity not being tracked? I'm not saying he needed 24/7 survelliance, but I know once you get flagged on a federal level your online/banking/cell activities will be monitored.

With all that said, I would find it hard to believe that these kids were recruited and trained to carry out such terror. But I'm starting to wonder if the government had prior knowledge to the attack and were unsuccessful in stopping it.

In recent years, it has been revealed that the white house and intelligence community had way more knowledge of 9/11 then they first suggested; I wouldn't be surprised if the same happened here.

 

[badvillain]

security's like that every year, IDK why people are saying it isn't. All the way down to military being their, EVERY YEAR.

I've been to major bowl games, the nba finals, the ncaa mens basketball final four and have never seen undercover ops with a presence like that. Of course it's possible they were there, but I'm certain I would have noticed seeing undercover ops with ear pieces scattered throughout the events.

If this is standard protocol to hire private security teams, it would just be nice for them to state it and provide the history of them being at other such recent events.

 

[daze23]

- Can we get confirmation if those undercover ops were from a privately commissioned security company? If they were, it means they had to be contracted; and who in our government contracted and authorized these men being there? And in the past, how many other events have they been present at?

- How was it possible that a wounded 19 year old with no military training was able to survive a shootout with hundreds of local, state and federal police and lead a manhunt that turned a city into a ghosttown?

- If the older brother was on their radar and was interviewed over 2 years ago how was his recent activity not being tracked? I'm not saying he needed 24/7 survelliance, but I know once you get flagged on a federal level your online/banking/cell activities will be monitored.

why would you think anyone owes you the info in the first question? no one has to explain to you who every suspicious looking person was. again, that's all stuff that originated from interweb photo detectives

second question isn't legit at all IMO. it's "possible" because it happened

I think the last question is legit, and we probably will find out more info on that. but I'm not sure what you "know" about what happens you get "flagged"

 

[Fillerguy]

- Can we get confirmation if those undercover ops were from a privately commissioned security company? If they were, it means they had to be contracted; and who in our government contracted and authorized these men being there? And in the past, how many other events have they been present at?

Who do you expect to answer your request?

- How was it possible that a wounded 19 year old with no military training was able to survive a shootout with hundreds of local, state and federal police and lead a manhunt that turned a city into a ghosttown?

I really dont understand why folks buy so much stock into police/government combat training. You dont need much personal skill to allude police, nikkas do it everyday and its a known fact that cops cant shoot for shyt. The kid could of very well exchanged fire with the police for a few secs than hid while the pigs fired in one direction for a few minutes.

- If the older brother was on their radar and was interviewed over 2 years ago how was his recent activity not being tracked? I'm not saying he needed 24/7 survelliance, but I know once you get flagged on a federal level your online/banking/cell activities will be monitored.

An reasonable question In the main thread I mentioned how Russian (Putin da gawd) warned us not to trust these nikkas. Call it a government fukk up, or not have enough evidence to warrant government tracking. Either makes more sense than the alternative.

With all that said, I would find it hard to believe that these kids were recruited and trained to carry out such terror. But I'm starting wonder if the government had prior knowledge to the attack and were unsuccessful in stopping it.

Why? Why would the government allow to an attack to happen when simple investigate would yield that G-men were warned about these guys? Why leave a paper trail?

 

[badvillain]

why would you think anyone owes you the info in the first question? no one has to explain to you who every suspicious looking person was. again, that's all stuff that originated from interweb photo detectives

It's to establish if this is standard protocol. If they are present at all major events, then them being there should not be an issue and the tinfoils can chill out.

Also, I just paid 7 stacks in federal taxes; I think any taxpayer has a right to know if our government is using private security companies with taxpayer money at national public events. If they were government ops I wouldn't have this question.

Who do you expect to answer your request?

Anyone with authority and the knowledge to do so

second question isn't legit at all IMO. it's "possible" because it happened

I really dont understand why folks buy so much stock into police/government combat training. You dont need much personal skill to allude police, nikkas do it everyday and its a known fact that cops cant shoot for shyt. The kid could of very well exchanged fire with the police for a few secs than hid while the pigs fired in one direction for a few minutes.

Not the fact that he survived the shootout, but the fact he was able to get away. I've rarely heard of anyone getting away from a crime scene once the helicopters come out. Where was the thermal scanner during the Thursday night shootout?

-----

And atleast you guys thought the the last one was legit haha. I don't think the first two questions I asked were unreasonable, did you hear the dumb shyt the media was asking at the press conference? It would just be nice to have official statements on these types of questions.

 

[the mechanic]

In the main thread I mentioned how Russian (Putin da gawd) warned us not to trust these nikkas.

He was right