UMG just cooked Drake ass lmfao - Call him anti-hip hop and say facts and criticism concerning Drake being a certified PDF have been widely reported

Smokin Rider

I been official
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,605
Reputation
2,330
Daps
33,051
Reppin
Seattle SuperChronic
Yes, this video was filmed in 2002, same with the album drop.



I always worked, so I make money off my Law Career, my investments and hip hop.

You talk in generic cliches from the 90s. Be more original.

I'm committed to earning so much off my Hip hop and investments that I don't have to work.

My sales are the highest they've ever been.

So take your dream killer self and tell that to your self, your children, your wife, and your family.

Not me, do you understand?


Imma say this as honest as possible, how tf you rap for 20 years and still have absolutely no flow? Your doubles are absolutely ass too. You rapping 23 years and sound exactly the same and can't rap on beat to save your life.
 

Red

All Star
Joined
May 31, 2012
Messages
1,612
Reputation
355
Daps
4,556
Reppin
NULL
Yes, this video was filmed in 2002, same with the album drop.



I always worked, so I make money off my Law Career, my investments and hip hop.

You talk in generic cliches from the 90s. Be more original.

I'm committed to earning so much off my Hip hop and investments that I don't have to work.

My sales are the highest they've ever been.

So take your dream killer self and tell that to your self, your children, your wife, and your family.

Not me, do you understand?


You openly earn around $1000 a year from your investments. You're not even beating debasement/inflation. Certainly not earning enough from it to never have to work, considering you're the wrong side of 40.
 
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
280
Reputation
-84
Daps
350
Reppin
NULL
He still has yet to prove any of that. The one example he gave was bots, a claim that he and his team eventually agreed had no merit

Again, i'm asking you, how did UMG not show neutrality?

I’m not the one bringing the lawsuit, so I don’t need to personally prove anything. The case is still in early legal proceedings, and discovery exists to determine whether UMG remained neutral or played a larger role.

Drake’s team believes there is enough circumstantial evidence to warrant further investigation, which is why they are requesting discovery. If UMG was neutral, discovery may confirm that. If not, this case raises important questions about corporate influence in hip-hop. While some argue there’s no direct proof, that’s exactly what discovery is meant to uncover.

As for the bot claim—I haven’t seen any statement from Drake’s team dismissing it as ‘meritless.’ If you have a source, I’d be interested in reviewing it.
 
Top