UMG just cooked Drake ass lmfao - Call him anti-hip hop and say facts and criticism concerning Drake being a certified PDF have been widely reported

itsyoung!!

Banned
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,914
Reputation
6,689
Daps
110,418
Reppin
Bay Area
I wish UMG would also talk about how Drake is exploiting people's misery with these gamble partnerships. fukkin disgusting human being
how would UMG do that when Fanduel or Draftkings probably pay a lot for promotion to UMG for ads on all their companies ? :dead: some of yall straight retarded on here :dead:

UMG also has Virgin Music. Virgin Music, under Virgin Group, also owns Virgin Hotels and Casinos


How would they hate Drake for gambling when they prey on people daily with their own casinos :dead: UMG would have to destroy their Virgin relationship to do that :dead: they gonna boycott themselves? :dead:

Side note: So is Kendrick a disgusting human being for tied to a company with a bigger gambling operation than Drake is tied to ?
 

Piff Perkins

Veteran
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
53,153
Reputation
19,780
Daps
290,749
The argument that laughing at Drake equals cheering on a manipulative record label is so stupid. This is a bad, frivolous lawsuit from a emotional baby who got finessed by his lawyers. He has no case, and anyone with a brain understands this. I get why certain demographics of stans - ie white boys - are defending him. But watching hip hop dudes defend him is a bridge too far. This is a pathetic lawsuit with no merit and you can already tell Drake's camp is setting up the "we fought the machine and we lost but it was worth it" defense. fukkouttahere. Getting the courts involved because you can't accept that people really liked a diss record is wild.
 

itsyoung!!

Banned
Bushed
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,914
Reputation
6,689
Daps
110,418
Reppin
Bay Area
@Revolutionary Lets talk about that. Lets talk about UMG is partnered with Virgin, who not only promotes gambling, but owns casinos :pachaha: lets discuss it since you want to bring it up :pachaha:
 

Harry B

Veteran
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
31,642
Reputation
-1,100
Daps
63,861
if drake didn’t file the lawsuit, would the Super Bowl have censored PDF out of the song during the live performance?
Nobody censored Kendrick, shyt was live.

He censored himself cause some non-hiphop foreign entity is threatening to sue rappers for making diss tracks.
So maybe, just maybe, out of respect for his political connects like Jay-z, Apple, TV-channels etc. he didn't wanna drag them into this Karen bullshyt.


Drake has not lost a single thing due to Kendrick playing on a internet joke/rumor. Just like Tyga didn't lose any deals when Drake said he was playing with underage girls (Kylie). He's losing a whole lot more due to him taking the L like a hoe
 

☑︎#VoteDemocrat

The Original
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
Dec 9, 2012
Messages
319,452
Reputation
-34,112
Daps
628,122
Reppin
The Deep State
Nobody censored Kendrick, shyt was live.

He censored himself cause some non-hiphop foreign entity is threatening to sue rappers for making diss tracks.
So maybe, just maybe, out of respect for his political connects like Jay-z, Apple, TV-channels etc. he didn't wanna drag them into this Karen bullshyt.
You don’t have evidence to the contrary. Drake filed the lawsuit before this.
 
Top