UMG just cooked Drake ass lmfao - Call him anti-hip hop and say facts and criticism concerning Drake being a certified PDF have been widely reported

[Overpss]

again he has not, at all, people in the industry have, kendricks idol dr dre was fukin michele le when she was 16 but ok

Drake is definitely a pedophile, what he did is exactly the legal definition of pedophilia.

 

[threattonature]

again he has not, at all, people in the industry have, kendricks idol dr dre was fukin michele le when she was 16 but ok

Dre is only two years older than Michele and seems he didn't start with her until she was 20. Where'd you get this 16 shyt from?

 

[Gifted one]

again he has not, at all, people in the industry have, kendricks idol dr dre was fukin michele le when she was 16 but ok

You'd let your 14 year old daughter/niece/God daughter/step daughter/cousin have conversations with a man 30+ about relationship advice? Like that wouldn't raise a few red flags to you? What if you found out your breh was talking to a 14 year old girl about relationship advice?

 

[L $ C]

You'd let your 14 year old daughter/niece/God daughter/step daughter/cousin have conversations with a man 30+ about relationship advice? Like that wouldn't raise a few red flags to you? What if you found out your breh was talking to a 14 year old girl about relationship advice?

no I would not, but that does not make drake a pedo

 

[L $ C]

Drake is definitely a pedophile, what he did is exactly the legal definition of pedophilia.

no it is not, where did drake say he is attracted to her or wants her? wtf is wit yall

 

[kidsinamerica_]

Idiot.

In this case, corporations are doing a muuuuuuch better job at protecting hip hop than Drake

So let me get this straight—when a corporation profits from false accusations in hip-hop, they’re ‘protecting’ the culture, but when an artist questions it, they’re the problem? Interesting logic.

 

[Overpss]

no it is not, where did drake say he is attracted to her or wants her? wtf is wit yall

Yes it is. It's my field of expertise, you won't teach me how to do my job.
I defend victims against pedophiles. Drake is a pedophile.

 

[itsyoung!!]

Wild thing is Kendrick outside of the songs has been silent.

yeah just outside of the songs, the grammies, the superbowl..........

 

[Overpss]

So let me get this straight—when a corporation profits from false accusations in hip-hop, they’re ‘protecting’ the culture, but when an artist questions it, they’re the problem? Interesting logic.

false accusations? but they're not false....the only one that tried to bring false accusation to the table was Drake when he lied about Kendrick's family, which forced Kendrick to reveal the truth about him.

 

[the artist known az]

Kendrick wrote that lawsuit

 

[bright black]

the same thing they did when the fake daughter never appeared
Dapfish and move goal posts

only drake stans want that lil girl to appear

 

[Pseudo]

This isn’t about censorship or being against artistic expression—it’s about whether a record label should remain neutral in a rap battle or be held accountable when it actively amplifies serious accusations.

Drake isn’t suing Kendrick; he’s suing UMG, his own label, for removing copyright restrictions and ensuring the diss track spread further—even as real-world threats escalated. His team argues that UMG’s actions went beyond distribution and into deliberate promotion of a narrative that falsely accused him of a serious crime.

UMG, on the other hand, claims that this is just part of hip-hop’s long tradition of diss tracks and exaggerated lyrics, arguing that interfering would set a dangerous precedent for artistic expression.

But this raises a bigger question: Should a label stay neutral in rap feuds, or does it have an obligation to step in when the stakes go beyond entertainment? Does profiting off a false accusation cross the line when it leads to real-world harm?

At the end of the day, this debate isn’t just about Drake—it’s about how much power corporations have in shaping public perception and whether they should be held accountable when that power has real-world consequences.

Can you give me an example of UMG not displaying neutrality in the battle? As far as I know, all they did was distribute the tracks of both artists.

Also, I don't' understand your point about profiting off of false accusations. Since the beginning of hip-hop, rap beef has existed, and rappers have always "defamed" and slung mud and each other. That was considered fair and a part of the genre. Why do you feel different now?

 

[Gifted one]

no I would not, but that does not make drake a pedo

It is very odd like behavior, if you know you wouldn't condone your breh doing that because for obvious reasons then you'd know why many here don't condone Drake doing that. Texting 14 year Olds and having long conversations about relationship advice is odd and seen as suspect. You admitting you wouldn't condone it so you see why many here is looking at Drake suspect correct?

 

[Urbanmiracle]

This is the greatest L in hip hop. From the memes, to the Super Bowl, to the Grammys to the Oscars to the skits, to how it’s engrained into pop culture, to ya own damn label giving you a piece by piece documentation of how much of an L you have taken. Jesus Christ. Drake may actually have to commit that.

Kendrick got this nikka throwing slides at drones. Remarkable

 

[L $ C]

Yes it is. It's my field of expertise, you won't teach me how to do my job.
I defend victims against pedophiles. Drake is a pedophile.

lmfaooooo, so because mille did a interview saying drake said he misses her then said there was nothing werid hes a pedo? you need help

and you prolly dont do your job very well