UMG just cooked Drake ass lmfao - Call him anti-hip hop and say facts and criticism concerning Drake being a certified PDF have been widely reported

[Theo Penn]

saying you miss a person if you have a friendship relationship with them is not "pedo activity" unless you are a fukking pedo. yall make the most simple things sexual

 

[DaHNIC82]

Pack this cake ass nikka and his hoe ass base the fukk up outta here. This Shyt been over since last year and muthafuggas still trying to debate

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

 

[derro13]

.

All jealousy again

 

[Not Crodie]

Kanye jealous af of Kendrick because he's the most acclaimed hip hop artist in rap history, took kanye's spot, but dude still called drake a fakkit

 

[Not Crodie]

Nap gonna think kendrick was a pawn when this conspiracy theory is easy to debunk, only a slow iq would even believe that

 

[staticshock]

saying you miss a person if you have a friendship relationship with them is not "pedo activity" unless you are a fukking pedo. yall make the most simple things sexual

you're not wrong and from that angle I see it, but also see my side, people make a lot of shyt sexual cuz they are weridos

You’re a fukking weirdo

 

[2ATMsYouSteppinOrWhat]

Begging for kendrick attention

And lowkey. Dot used both drake & umg

 

[tehparadox]

Napoleon still wishing for an industry conspiracy theory when 1) nobody forced them to battle and 2) we saw the immediate impact of kendrick songs in real time, without any promotion or industry's involvement

 

[L $ C]

You’re a fukking weirdo

no, you're someone whos obsessed with a narrative , again the only pedo here and woman beater is kendricks idol dr dre who he was fine with. not drake

 

[tehparadox]

no, you're someone whos obsessed with a narrative , again the only pedo here and woman beater is kendricks idol dr dre who he was fine with. not drake

But Drake has been exposed as a pedo...

 

[kidsinamerica_]

I never thought I'd see hip-hop fans being against artistic expression. Y'all Drake fans are something else

This isn’t about censorship or being against artistic expression—it’s about whether a record label should remain neutral in a rap battle or be held accountable when it actively amplifies serious accusations.

Drake isn’t suing Kendrick; he’s suing UMG, his own label, for removing copyright restrictions and ensuring the diss track spread further—even as real-world threats escalated. His team argues that UMG’s actions went beyond distribution and into deliberate promotion of a narrative that falsely accused him of a serious crime.

UMG, on the other hand, claims that this is just part of hip-hop’s long tradition of diss tracks and exaggerated lyrics, arguing that interfering would set a dangerous precedent for artistic expression.

But this raises a bigger question: Should a label stay neutral in rap feuds, or does it have an obligation to step in when the stakes go beyond entertainment? Does profiting off a false accusation cross the line when it leads to real-world harm?

At the end of the day, this debate isn’t just about Drake—it’s about how much power corporations have in shaping public perception and whether they should be held accountable when that power has real-world consequences.

 

[tehparadox]

This isn’t about censorship or being against artistic expression—it’s about whether a record label should remain neutral in a rap battle or be held accountable when it actively amplifies serious accusations.

Drake isn’t suing Kendrick; he’s suing UMG, his own label, for removing copyright restrictions and ensuring the diss track spread further—even as real-world threats escalated. His team argues that UMG’s actions went beyond distribution and into deliberate promotion of a narrative that falsely accused him of a serious crime.

UMG, on the other hand, claims that this is just part of hip-hop’s long tradition of diss tracks and exaggerated lyrics, arguing that interfering would set a dangerous precedent for artistic expression.

But this raises a bigger question: Should a label stay neutral in rap feuds, or does it have an obligation to step in when the stakes go beyond entertainment? Does profiting off a false accusation cross the line when it leads to real-world harm?

At the end of the day, this debate isn’t just about Drake—it’s about how much power corporations have in shaping public perception and whether they should be held accountable when that power has real-world consequences.

Idiot.

In this case, corporations are doing a muuuuuuch better job at protecting hip hop than Drake

 

[L $ C]

But Drake has been exposed as a pedo...

again he has not, at all, people in the industry have, kendricks idol dr dre was fukin michele le when she was 16 but ok

 

[tehparadox]

again he has not, at all, people in the industry have, kendricks idol dr dre was fukin michele le when she was 16 but ok

But he has...he done pedo stuff, he's certified.