Dude had like 3 title defenses in 2 years and none of his opponents were tough. Machida (blown up)
The lack of title defences is because he's injury prone.
In those 3 title defences, he's fought Anderson x2 and Machida. Two elite and very tough fighters. So Machida & Anderson are not tough?
The UFC is a freaking joke and Dana White protects his great white hype well since he knows who his fans are.
If Chris Weidman was black, he would've still gotten Anderson x2, Machida and an upcoming fight with Vitor.
Conor McGregor is an example of getting protected, Chris Weidman is not.
Meanwhile, let's all look at Jones over the past 2 years
Jones and Weidman share (or will share) common opponents in Vitor and Machida. Yes, Weidman is fighting non-TRT Vitor, but that's not Weidman or the UFC's fault. And like I said, he was originally slated to fight TRT-Vitor.
And I'm not saying that Jones doesn't have a good resume. He has the arguably the most impressive resume in MMA history. At this rate, Jones will easily surpass the likes of Fedor, Anderson & GSP as the greatest MMA fighter of all time (some people believe he already has).
They even tried to force him to take on a challenger on a 3 week notice
It was 8 days notice. Stylistically, Chael was a very easy match-up for Jones, and he (Chael) was considerably under-sized. But I understand why Jones didn't take the fight. Why risk (albeit a small risk) your name/legacy against a fighter with pretty much nothing to lose. This is MMA, anything can happen. A fighter with the legacy/status of Jon Jones can't be taking any unnecessary risks.