@FAH1223 out of curiosity if Spain or Portugal became dictatorships again would you consider that a regression/negative?
Wouldn't be good, I'm not for dictatorships
@FAH1223 out of curiosity if Spain or Portugal became dictatorships again would you consider that a regression/negative?
to protect themselves from 1 day being in the same position as the middle eastIt's either time to expand on your statement or read the histories of Turkey and Pakistan/India again.
You realize Pakistan and India were partitioned in 1947 right?
???!!!to protect themselves from 1 day being in the same position as the middle east
@FAH1223 out of curiosity if Spain or Portugal became dictatorships again would you consider that a regression/negative?
You're mistaking nefarious policy for popular opinionDoes the Turkish president have the legal power to assassinate his citizens with little judicidal oversight? Detain people for years without even pressing charges ?Cuz the US president does
You're mistaking nefarious policy for popular opinion
these are largely unpopular pieces of American abuse of power
Edit: and I'm pretty sure the detaining people for years with no charges has happened quite frequently in turkey, for what it's worth. @FAH1223 probably knows more about that if true
Nah man that's just not the topic at handPopular or not, land of the free home of the brave is run by leaders with despot powers. No deflection can change that.
Also I noticed you skipped over the legal power a US president has to execute Americans just by making a call.
Nah man that's just not the topic at hand
You're talking about deflections and skipping over, why would I do that? Those are despicable and disgusting
I'm talking about popular support for authoritarianism, not saying turkey is more oppressive than the US
Fair enough but that actually illustrates my pointBush mad a massive power grab after 9/11 and got reelected. That's as popular support as you can get
Traditional cultures value stronger leaders. As long as he gets the job done.Fair enough but that actually illustrates my point
Bush still had to use buzzwords like freedom and democracy. He had to sell his fukkery to get votes
The popular support I've witnessed, which is not scientific by any means, is stark and in praise of a guy who shamelessly dominates a political sphere. A lotta people think Erdogan is too soft it's why I brought up pro-Mussolini Italians, and Chileans to this day who riot on 9/11 in the name of Pinochet's takeover
The latter 3 find support in people who praise power, bush found his in people who have a fukked up vision of liberty and democracy
Can you answer where was this huge Western concern for democracy when the military was overthrowing governments and executing elected presidents in Turkey ? All while a member of NATO in good standing no less.
Pretend to care about democracy and human rights brehs
Uh, in the context of the Cold War where communist governments you most likely support(but will deny) were sending in tanks on their own citizens and other countries that they annexed when they wanted to peacefully brake away from them and a mere decade after wrapping up killing tens of millions of their own citizens.
You can fukk right off.
idk why you fakkits keep changing your usernames.
But hey why are you deflecting?
Damn u got mad real quick.
Off a basic ass question too.
Attuturk was president and brutalizing the opposition DECADES before the cold war. He denied Kurds were even an ethnicity and banned them from using their own language with no Western complaints. Now they are champions of the same kurds
Germany, EU and US have GREAT relations with Egypt who overthrew their elected leader and have him sentenced to death
Grow some balls and admit your only bothered by his political slant. If he was secular he'd be another central Asian strongman the west happily cooperated with. Azerbaijan president just made his wife the VP. Nobody cared.
Brehs got so triggered, went straight to insults
Does the Turkish president have the legal power to assassinate his citizens with little judicidal oversight?
Oh, we're going to go back that far?
Hmmm and what was going on before and during that time period.
IDK, BREH MAYBE MORE PRESSING MATTERS LIKE WWI AND WWII?
The Belgian Congo was in full swing and it would take another 10+ years for GB to give up India.
I'm sure the monarchies of Europe were just appalled by his behavior