Tulsi stans, come get ya Auntie!

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,880
Reputation
3,046
Daps
70,229
Reppin
New York
So you don't believe the apparatus that was central to organization of said event should be removed to further disrupt plans and attempts of future incidents?
Uh no, why can't the people actually doing the violent inciting just be banned? That's what they do when violence is incited on facebook/twitter right? They don't deplatform the entire site.
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,880
Reputation
3,046
Daps
70,229
Reppin
New York
"Come on guys, fess up. Who here was involved and participated in storming the capitol, we're going to have ban you guys...."

The fact that you're being this dense is hysterical and sad.
So you're saying there isn't evidence of posts and replies inciting violence on social media platforms?
And really the perps who broke the law should have been caught on site at the capital not after the fact.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
22,379
Reputation
8,181
Daps
94,552
Reppin
Chase U
Racist doing racist things, labeled domestic terrorist? agreed, also include pedos/rapist/degenerates/scammers/gangs...in other words, behaviors that adds unnecessary expenses to cost of living

Racist mimicking a random day in Portland, labeled domestic terrorist? nah. If you're viewing reckless behavior along party lines...then you're more of a help to Tulsi's agenda than her tweets
What do you mean here?
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,130
Reputation
3,752
Daps
110,111
Reppin
דעת
So you're saying there isn't evidence of posts and replies inciting violence on social media platforms?
And really the perps who broke the law should have been caught on site at the capital not after the fact.
:dwillhuh:

My guy, what the hell are you even talking about?

Parler existed solely because right wing fanatics, Qanons and Nazis couldn't handle being the object of constant ridicule and attention based of how sh*tty their opinions are on the rest of social media. It was literally a safe space for some of the most horrible people but was allowed to exist before it was used to plan, coordinate and ultimately contain evidence of a coup.

If law enforcement had to rely on catching people in the act of a crime and there investigation ended there, jails and prisons would be empty.
 

el_oh_el

Bulls On Parade...
Supporter
Joined
Aug 23, 2012
Messages
10,318
Reputation
1,920
Daps
26,059
Reppin
H-Town
So you're saying there isn't evidence of posts and replies inciting violence on social media platforms?
And really the perps who broke the law should have been caught on site at the capital not after the fact.
Do those other social media platforms have a large chunk of the wackos that incited violence?
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,880
Reputation
3,046
Daps
70,229
Reppin
New York
:dwillhuh:

My guy, what the hell are you even talking about?

Parler existed solely because right wing fanatics, Qanons and Nazis couldn't handle being the object of constant ridicule and attention based of how sh*tty their opinions are on the rest of social media. It was literally a safe space for some of the most horrible people but was allowed to exist before it was used to plan, coordinate and ultimately contain evidence of a coup.

If law enforcement had to rely on catching people in the act of a crime and there investigation ended there, jails and prisons would be empty.
OK, why can't you answer direct questions? You go off on tangents about info no one even asked about.

Thousands of Facebook Groups buzzed with calls for violence ahead of U.S. election

Facebook did the same thing. But they weren't deplatformed. Why?

I don't care about Parler, what I'm getting at is Facebook and Twitter are getting away with what Parler can't. Are you not curious why? Doesn't it point to them having too much power?
 

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,130
Reputation
3,752
Daps
110,111
Reppin
דעת
OK, why can't you answer direct questions? You go off on tangents about info no one even asked about.

Thousands of Facebook Groups buzzed with calls for violence ahead of U.S. election

Facebook did the same thing. But they weren't deplatformed. Why?

I don't care about Parler, what I'm getting at is Facebook and Twitter are getting away with what Parler can't. Are you not curious why? Doesn't it point to them having too much power?
I have answered your question more than once, Facebook and Twitter are not full time snowflake hideaways and manage their own platforms...whose going to deplatform them? :mjlol:
 

AnonymityX1000

Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
30,880
Reputation
3,046
Daps
70,229
Reppin
New York
I have answered your question more than once, Facebook and Twitter are not full time snowflake hideaways and manage their own platforms...whose going to deplatform them? :mjlol:
Uh Apple/google can delete them from their app stores and devices. Der.
And as for questions you haven't answered.
  • So you're saying there isn't evidence of posts and replies inciting violence on social media platforms?
  • why can't the people actually doing the violent inciting just be banned? That's what they do when violence is incited on facebook/twitter right? They don't deplatform the entire site.
Feel free to answer when you're ready. lol
 
Last edited:

Hood Critic

The Power Circle
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,130
Reputation
3,752
Daps
110,111
Reppin
דעת
Uh Apple/google can delete them from their app stores and devices. Der.
And as for questions you haven't answered.
  • So you're saying there isn't evidence of posts and replies inciting violence on social media platforms?
  • why can't the people actually doing the violent inciting just be banned? That's what they do when violence is incited on facebook/twitter right? They don't deplatform the entire site.
Feel free to answer when you're ready. lol

  • Apple and Google can delete them but they are web based platforms that you can still visit in your browser, so what's you point?
  • You've moved the goal post so far from your own original argument - yes and the groups and users were purged just like Parler was purged because the overwhelming majority of it supported the incitement.
  • How exactly does a Parler admin identify everyone? Who bans the Parler admins and site owners? This is circular nonsense.
We're only having this back and forth because you refuse to acknowledge the fact that Parler was the HQ for the attacks that you supposedly believe were a stain on democracy. While trying to deflect to some sort of "big tech" boogie man.
 
Top