Tulsi Gabbard, Democratic Presidential Candidate, Sues Google For $50 Million Over Suspension of Ad

[Prince.Skeletor]

btw, I am a libertarian supporting Tulsi Gabbard, a demoratic candidate.
Now THAT is the definition of NOT being a Partisan.
See how that works?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

LOL what do you mean what does party have anthing to do with this?
I kept calling you an indoctrinated partisan, what did you think that meant?

That's what I'm trying to figure out. Is this gonna be another one of those threads where you keep quoting me over and over but say nothing?

Now THAT is an insane lack of self awareness.
You mad she took pics with modi while the U.S. is massacring village after village, destroying countries, putting puppet govts everywhere, destabalizing regions after region, causing mass povertry, is a country full of mega corporations that almost all collaborated with the Nazis and you want sit in the U.S. while talking about Modi?
No american has any right to talk about Modi, let's be real.

That is a lack of self awareness, to put leaders of other countries at such a high pedestal while not expecting the same in the country you live.
Live in a country that doesn't destroy entire countries first then talk about modi.

First off, you have no clue where I live.

Second, it's bullshyt to say that I can't criticize mass murderers like Modi because there are other mass murderers out there too. I dare you to name ONE murderous world leader that I have whitewashed the crimes of.

Third, she didn't just "take a picture with Modi", I explained this shyt to you already, when I showed you exactly how violent and despicable he was and then followed with:

Now, you think that Tulsi would distant herself from such organizations, right?

Since 2013, Gabbard has attended conferences across the United States organized by Sangh affiliates, like the Vishwa Hindu Parishad of America, whose counterpart in India has been linked to advocating violence against Muslims in India and was classified last summer as a “militant religious organization” in the CIA World Factbook.

In a November 2017 video message, Gabbard announced that she would be chairing the 2018 World Hindu Congress, a conference held once every four years organized by the VHPA and RSS that has drawn other Hindu groups, in addition to Hindu nationalists. She described the event as a “global platform where Hindus will be able to come together, share ideas and inspiration, as we seek ways to positively impact the communities around us and around the world.”

She doesn't just attend their events, she agreed to chair a conference organized by the Indian version of White Supremacists.

And about their leader, Narendra Modi, who once helped facilitate a riot where thousands of Muslims were killed and 150,000 were displaced? I'll quote Jacobin.

For about a decade, the United States refused to give Modi a visa to travel to the US in light of his involvement in the Gujarat riots. For Gabbard, this was a “great blunder,” and she later told the press that “there was a lot of misinformation that surrounded the event in 2002.” She personally congratulated Modi on his 2014 election, and was later involved in organizing his first trip to the US. She also met two BJP leaders who had visited the United States beforehand, and spoke alongside them at an event in Atlanta.

When a congressional panel was held in April 2014 on “the plight of religious minorities in India,” with witnesses testifying about the mistreatment of Muslims, Gabbard said she didn’t “believe the time of this hearing is a coincidence” and that it aimed to “influence the outcome of India’s national elections.” Gabbard voted against House Resolution 417, which criticized India’s record on religious violence and called for specific measures to guarantee religious freedom in the country, explaining that its passage wouldn’t help US-India relations. Yet two years later, Gabbard introduced a similar resolution that covered neighboring Muslim-majority Bangladesh, saying she was “particularly concerned over issues of religious freedom, and specifically, attacks against minority Hindus, Christians, Buddhists, and others” in the country.

You can see that the pro-Modi forces love how she supports him and capes for him every chance she gets.

“I was delighted to accept the invite of Prime Minister Modi. He is a leader whose example and dedication to the people he serves should be an inspiration to elected officials everywhere,” she said ahead of her December 15-January 3 visit.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

btw, I am a libertarian supporting Tulsi Gabbard, a demoratic candidate.
Now THAT is the definition of NOT being a Partisan.
See how that works?

No, that's actually not the definition, as was already pointed out to you. You're claiming that your allegiance to Tulsi overrides anything she's doing wrong in the issue at hand. That's the actual definition of a partisan.

partisan
/ˈpɑːtɪzan,ˌpɑːtɪˈzan/
noun

1. 1.
   a strong supporter of a party, cause, or person.

And I'm an independent who is not supporting Tulsi but would be willing to give tepid support to several other democrats, but none of that is relevant to the false First Amendment claim and ridiculous lawsuit which are the topic of this thread...so how am I being "partisan" again?

 

[Pressure]