Trump orders USAID to be put under U.S. Department of State (DOS) amidst foreign aid freeze; Marco Rubio confirms 83% of USAID cut; thousands fired

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
64,477
Reputation
6,447
Daps
172,085
This should be the actual take, USAID being good or bad isn't part of the actual discussion that needs to be had. We have an unelected bureaucrat deciding what government programs should be defunded based on lining his own wealth and pockets. What's to stop him from using this same logic for social security next ?
Fax
There’s a fair bit of ignorance on aid in this thread. I can’t comment on long term development programmes which do have much more political aims and strings attached but humanitarian aid is a different thing entirely. And the idea American humanitarian funding isn’t beneficial or liked in places it’s spent is ridiculous

The US are the biggest donors in emergencies and it is spent/ used by organisations USAID give it to with the humanitarian mandate in use (neutrality, impartiality and independence). Now the US will be selective in where money goes to a degree (see Ukraine) but the US spends millions keeping people alive from DRC, Mali and north east Nigeria to Gaza, Yemen and Syria. Now we can always dig deep and say ‘well America is the source of the problem’ but the humanitarian mandate doesn’t give a shyt about that. Its role is to help people stay alive and hopefully move back to normality. And this isn’t a sort of nice to have. I’ve worked my entire adult life in the humanitarian sector and when money dries up people die. So yeh US not providing UN funds to provide food in South Sudan or give money to an INGO to keep clean water running in Gaza, that has massive impact on families ability to live.

At the macro level sure there’s political reasons for the purpose of USAID but although it’s a fukked up system where western states keep refugees and displaced people alive, currently in the present system if the money stops, the clean water stops, the food stops. Shutting down USAID will have major repercussions.
Also fax
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
47,300
Reputation
7,216
Daps
150,345
Reppin
CookoutGang
There’s a fair bit of ignorance on aid in this thread. I can’t comment on long term development programmes which do have much more political aims and strings attached but humanitarian aid is a different thing entirely. And the idea American humanitarian funding isn’t beneficial or liked in places it’s spent is ridiculous

The US are the biggest donors in emergencies and it is spent/ used by organisations USAID give it to with the humanitarian mandate in use (neutrality, impartiality and independence). Now the US will be selective in where money goes to a degree (see Ukraine) but the US spends millions keeping people alive from DRC, Mali and north east Nigeria to Gaza, Yemen and Syria. Now we can always dig deep and say ‘well America is the source of the problem’ but the humanitarian mandate doesn’t give a shyt about that. Its role is to help people stay alive and hopefully move back to normality. And this isn’t a sort of nice to have. I’ve worked my entire adult life in the humanitarian sector and when money dries up people die. So yeh US not providing UN funds to provide food in South Sudan or give money to an INGO to keep clean water running in Gaza, that has massive impact on families ability to live.

At the macro level sure there’s political reasons for the purpose of USAID but although it’s a fukked up system where western states keep refugees and displaced people alive, currently in the present system if the money stops, the clean water stops, the food stops. Shutting down USAID will have major repercussions.
@FAH1223 alias :ohhh:
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
91,252
Reputation
3,781
Daps
162,811
Reppin
Brooklyn
you bozos are going to get heaved in to an oven shouting both sides

what a disgrace
 

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
91,252
Reputation
3,781
Daps
162,811
Reppin
Brooklyn
Too hypothetical? Contractors and NGO partners are bankrupt

I would imagine some organizations/people can run shoestring budgets temporarily because everyone is invested, the issue will be the material when it is gone and it can't be replaced if it's required...


I know people who have relocated their whole families to support missions like USAID(not anymore we're all old now)


makes me sick
 

altruicsense

Lord of the 7 Kingdoms
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
2,418
Reputation
-64
Daps
7,142
Reppin
Westeros
doesn't matter which side you're on, but if it doesn't bother u how these nikkaz r movin then i don't know what to say. it's like the cold war when u just say your neighbor is a commie and they shut him down in the middle of the night. the dems created a monster. the people got the government they deserve. this timeline is wild. and this south african nikka elon playing game of thrones. what?
 
Joined
May 29, 2012
Messages
8,410
Reputation
1,029
Daps
26,334
Reppin
Philadelphia
doesn't matter which side you're on, but if it doesn't bother u how these nikkaz r movin then i don't know what to say. it's like the cold war when u just say your neighbor is a commie and they shut him down in the middle of the night. the dems created a monster. the people got the government they deserve. this timeline is wild. and this south african nikka elon playing game of thrones. what?
What do you mean the dems created a monster?
 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
31,007
Reputation
5,878
Daps
138,314
Reppin
NULL
It would seem the judicial is the only branch that is still functional. (Largely)
Thank god the judicial is spread out over thousands of judges and hundreds of jurisdictions.
 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
31,007
Reputation
5,878
Daps
138,314
Reppin
NULL
We might have lucked out be that Trump and Musk are so stupid.

Imagine facing a proper villain like dikk Cheney with Trump’s cult following. :lupe:
 
Top