Trump is proposing a system similar(actually identical) to what has been in place in Canada and Australia for years... yet Canada/Australia aren't labeled racist for doing so...
Why? @Call Me James @Robbie3000 @im not you @acri1
Because this one was crafted ad introduced by a known bigot.
Actually, the Australian law was crafted by a known bigot too.
"During an interview on the John Laws radio programme on 1 August 1988, Howard detailed the policy, expressing his preference to bias immigration towards skilled applicants rather than family reunion. Later that afternoon, on the ABC PM programme, Howard discussed the policy in relation to Asian immigration to Australia:
"I do believe that if it is – in the eyes of some in the community – that it's too great, it would be in our immediate-term interest and supporting of social cohesion if it were slowed down a little, so the capacity of the community to absorb it was greater.""
"Howard's Shadow Finance Minister, John Stone, elaborated, saying that "Asian immigration has to be slowed. It's no use dancing around the bushes". Ian Sinclair, National Party leader in the Coalition, also supported the policy, saying: "If there is any risk of an undue build-up of Asians against others in the community, then you need to control it. I certainly believe that at the moment we need to reduce the number of Asians.""
"The Labor government sought to quickly exploit Howard's Asian remarks by introducing a parliamentary motion rejecting the use of race to select immigrants. Howard opposed this motion."
"
One Australia was the immigration and ethnic affairs policy of the Liberal-National Opposition in Australia, released in 1988. The One Australia policy proclaimed a vision of "one nation and one future". It called for an end to multiculturalism and opposed a treaty with Aboriginal Australians. The policy set the scene for the August 1988 suggestion by Leader of the Opposition John Howard that the rate of Asian immigration to Australia be reduced."
One Australia policy - Wikipedia
Refused to condemn "One Nation", basically Australia's Alt-Right party.
The Telegraph - Calcutta : Opinion
Refused to apologize for kidnapping indigenous children because it happened so long ago (meaning up until 1970s)
Nothing to say sorry for: Howard - National - smh.com.au
White mobs of Australians who harass brown people aren't racist, they've just had too much to drink:
PM refuses to use racist tag - National - smh.com.au
skill based being a color blind policy is not an opinion its a fact.
family unification being intended for europeans to bring family members in to keep america white is also a fact, but white supremacists made the same analytical error you are making and you are trying to make me make, which is extrapolating from current patterns of behavior
False.
As I showed up above, John Howard admitted that he introduced skill-based immigration to replace family-based because he wanted to reduce the number of brown people coming into Australia.
Also, family unification became the primary law (replacing country-based rules) back in the 1960s. It greatly decreased the % of White people in America. By the 1960s most immigrants were not European, so claiming that it was meant to "keep america white" is completely false both in intent and in effect.
quote me where i called this racist. that wasnt my objection to this retarded plan at all
you disgust me
