Trump: ‘I Need the Kind of Generals That Hitler Had’
- Thread starter RamsayBolton
- Start date
That Tom Cruise movie Valkyrie was very good…
Last edited:
pimpineasy
Superstar
Sounds like your favorite rapper.
Maybe he dropping a mixtape soon
Maybe he dropping a mixtape soon
[Trump News] Hegseth says firing of top military lawyers was about making sure "they don't exist to be roadblocks to anything that happens."
Listen carefully to the false choice between upholding the Constitution and being a “roadblock.” A lawyer is not a “roadblock” when the lawyer advises a client that a proposal is illegal. This is a tell that there is an undisclosed plan to misuse the military and they don’t want to hear “no” from any lawyers.
This is the wrong path..
1/11
@DarrigoMelanie
If you’re changing the definition of human rights, it means you plan on violating people’s human rights.
2/11
@homeostatic_fox
🫶
3/11
@ChadMcWonderful
Someone is doing it in there - it is a very specific group of people - staring with the top official
There is ONE SOLUTION AMERICA for that boss... a group of warriors meets him at his luxury car when he gets off work... and convinces him the value of life by putting his on the line
You Americans had better get that 'right to bare arms' working for u, or us Canadians are going to show u how its done
4/11
@mic33244
Defund NPR.
5/11
@cacosta464
“Human rights” has been a long standing pretext for pushing Marxist ideology. It rightly warrants close examination.
6/11
@TomFooleryMeow
political corruption
7/11
@amy_bresnen
Have you heard of Dobbs?
8/11
@ManCrabby51667
OR, you are making amendments to your predecessor's immoral changing of the definition, previously.
9/11
@RichardAngwin
Trump and Rubio are gutting human rights reports, stripping out abuses like prison conditions and corruption. This isn't redefining rights, it's enabling violations. Shame on them for weakening global accountability.
10/11
@ziegler34
what's next, changing the definition of vaccine?
11/11
@CharGrahn
That’s NPR reporting.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
@DarrigoMelanie
If you’re changing the definition of human rights, it means you plan on violating people’s human rights.
2/11
@homeostatic_fox
🫶3/11
@ChadMcWonderful
Someone is doing it in there - it is a very specific group of people - staring with the top official
There is ONE SOLUTION AMERICA for that boss... a group of warriors meets him at his luxury car when he gets off work... and convinces him the value of life by putting his on the line
You Americans had better get that 'right to bare arms' working for u, or us Canadians are going to show u how its done
4/11
@mic33244
Defund NPR.
5/11
@cacosta464
“Human rights” has been a long standing pretext for pushing Marxist ideology. It rightly warrants close examination.
6/11
@TomFooleryMeow
political corruption
7/11
@amy_bresnen
Have you heard of Dobbs?
8/11
@ManCrabby51667
OR, you are making amendments to your predecessor's immoral changing of the definition, previously.
9/11
@RichardAngwin
Trump and Rubio are gutting human rights reports, stripping out abuses like prison conditions and corruption. This isn't redefining rights, it's enabling violations. Shame on them for weakening global accountability.
10/11
@ziegler34
what's next, changing the definition of vaccine?
11/11
@CharGrahn
That’s NPR reporting.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
This is the wrong path..
1/11
@DarrigoMelanie
If you’re changing the definition of human rights, it means you plan on violating people’s human rights.
2/11
@homeostatic_fox
3/11
@ChadMcWonderful
Someone is doing it in there - it is a very specific group of people - staring with the top official
There is ONE SOLUTION AMERICA for that boss... a group of warriors meets him at his luxury car when he gets off work... and convinces him the value of life by putting his on the line
You Americans had better get that 'right to bare arms' working for u, or us Canadians are going to show u how its done
4/11
@mic33244
Defund NPR.
5/11
@cacosta464
“Human rights” has been a long standing pretext for pushing Marxist ideology. It rightly warrants close examination.
6/11
@TomFooleryMeow
political corruption
7/11
@amy_bresnen
Have you heard of Dobbs?
8/11
@ManCrabby51667
OR, you are making amendments to your predecessor's immoral changing of the definition, previously.
9/11
@RichardAngwin
Trump and Rubio are gutting human rights reports, stripping out abuses like prison conditions and corruption. This isn't redefining rights, it's enabling violations. Shame on them for weakening global accountability.
10/11
@ziegler34
what's next, changing the definition of vaccine?
11/11
@CharGrahn
That’s NPR reporting.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
The last state department ignored them. It only makes sense that this one would do the same
This country is settling nicely into its facist nature
Is it fair to compare MAGA to the Nazis?
Posted on Sun Apr 20 13:36:41 2025 UTC
There has been a number of posts indicating that MAGA supporters are really Fascist/Nazis. Curious how others see it!
There has been a number of posts indicating that MAGA supporters are really Fascist/Nazis. Curious how others see it!
Commented on Sun Apr 20 13:39:03 2025 UTC
Maga sure loves nazi salutes, even busting them out multiple times at Trumps inauguration and CPAC.
Maga sure loves nazi salutes, even busting them out multiple times at Trumps inauguration and CPAC.
Kevin M. Kruse (@kevinmkruse.bsky.social)
“Do you agree people should be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Trump doesn’t.” That’s what this is all about. It’s not hard to communicate at all.
bsky.app
1/35
kevinmkruse.bsky.social
“Do you agree people should be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Trump doesn’t.”
That’s what this is all about. It’s not hard to communicate at all.
2/35
catbnymble.bsky.social
Trump is guilty. He assumes everyone is guilty.
3/35
metacogito.bsky.social
Unfortunately I think that statement (with which i 100% agree) is part of why this language isn't as impactful. People get "declared" guilty before a trial all the time, and these Fox-fried brains use that as proof that "innocent until proven guilty" is some vestigial relic.
4/35
dalatindiva.bsky.social
DNC talks impeachment - but they didn't do it twice before
ONE legal pathway left
5/35
shanahstone.bsky.social
Remember the Central Park Five?
Trump is a horrible human being.
And everyone who joins shows who they are too.
6/35
libtee.bsky.social
Ironic. He thinks he should be considered innocent even after proven guilty.
7/35
jhoward.bsky.social
“if Trump tried to call *you* MS-13, how would you clear your name? you couldn’t. not if he wins this case”
8/35
vanillaredfox.bsky.social
You’re forgetting that the Democratic Party are the blueprint for fukking up one car funerals. Embarrassing.
9/35
medlee.bsky.social
Trump doesn't care about guilt or innocence. He only cares about getting his way and punishing those that don't agree with his insanity.
10/35
tim-doin-tim-stuff.bsky.social
I'd go so far as to say he doesn't care if they are guilty or innocent at ALL
He cares about whether treating them as guilty, or declaring them innocent is of benefit to him
It's always about him
It's ONLY about him
11/35
rattacasal.bsky.social
He's used our judicial system to his advantage his entire life. This is the same but on steroids.
12/35
kvett20.bsky.social
Nah. He views himself as king. Full stop. Actual criminals that hurt, maime, break laws in his name, he pardons. Otherwise, if he can hurt someone to further his narrative he’ll do it. He’s an enemy of the republic.
13/35
zakaryalan.bsky.social
Remember when he told police officers that it was okay to beat up people they were arresting. Getting arrested isn't the same as being tried and found guilty. Lots of people are wrongly accused of crimes.
14/35
snowdenwriter.bsky.social
Trump does however believe in innocent after being proven guilty.
15/35
stlugal.bsky.social
Not true at all. He had no trouble defending Roy Moore, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Brett Kavanaugh. So I suppose it depends on melanin and type of crime.
16/35
kablackquois.bsky.social
I think it’s also important to point out how much he dragged out his own due process. It all fits together. “…for my friends, everything.”
17/35
jmdevitt.bsky.social
Himself excepted of course—then, it’s ‘innocent *after* proven guilty.’
18/35
marcdoesbluesky.bsky.social
You can be patriotic about it too: In America, people are innocent until proven guilty. In America, you don’t throw people in a jail because you don’t like what they say. In America, no one is above the law. I wish Dem leaders would frame it this way more.
19/35
pixiebithers.bsky.social
Central Park 5 and a full page notice in The Times would be a precursor
precursor
20/35
calvinonthebeach.bsky.social
No different from when he went after the Central Park 5, later known as the Exonerated 5. Would seem POC aren't entitled to due process in Trump World.
21/35
jeffreyd.bsky.social
no one says it because we're all kind of afraid that most Americans would say they don't either
22/35
gordonvincent.bsky.social
It's about Putin's goal of rebuilding a Soviet Empire. That requires chaos in the west. To that end, he gives orders to the Rapist. The Rapist obeys, because he wants to live another day. He hasn't made a single decision on his own in ten years.
23/35
elidelajandro.bsky.social
Unless you're an elected Dem, because 98% of them have lost the ability to speak like a regular person.
24/35
austinred.bsky.social
That’s for a criminal case, but due process is for any type of case…criminal, civil, administrative, family law, etc.
25/35
cmaguire3.bsky.social
If trump had had his way, the 100% innocent Central Park Five would all have been executed for crimes they did not commit.
26/35
nocure4curiosity.bsky.social
Clearly. He wanted to execute the Central Park teens even after they were found innocent.
27/35
metacogito.bsky.social
I dont think that phrasing carries the same self-evident import for the modern, what-about media-fried brain. But scooping up an innocent person who never has any chance whatsoever to explain their innocence before an irreversible punishment? That is a no-brainer.
28/35
kathleenwellman.bsky.social
Or, in his case, innocent when proven guilty!
29/35
phil-stone.bsky.social
Felontrump thinks they are all guilty, or stupid. And he considers himself smart.
30/35
wholegrains.bsky.social
And he believes he’s innocent even when proven guilty.
31/35
sfor4th.bsky.social
No one’s having trouble communicating this. Except you - since you can’t remember to blame Republicans
32/35
gilliesracer.bsky.social
Sadly, Trump believes he should be the only one to be considered innocent and never proven guilty.
33/35
callalily57.bsky.social
I've seen quite a few people respond that that only applies to citizens.
34/35
momchomsky.bsky.social
It needs to be communicated that these people treat the Constitution as an impediment to their natural instincts.
bsky.app/profile/momc...
35/35
alissa914.bsky.social
Trump doesn't think he should have to prove anything he believes. If you try to say he's wrong, he threatens you until you let him get his way. He's not a hard person to figure out.... a lot of world leaders already manipulate him and he's unaware.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
kevinmkruse.bsky.social“Do you agree people should be considered ‘innocent until proven guilty’? Trump doesn’t.”
That’s what this is all about. It’s not hard to communicate at all.
2/35
catbnymble.bsky.socialTrump is guilty. He assumes everyone is guilty.
3/35
metacogito.bsky.socialUnfortunately I think that statement (with which i 100% agree) is part of why this language isn't as impactful. People get "declared" guilty before a trial all the time, and these Fox-fried brains use that as proof that "innocent until proven guilty" is some vestigial relic.
4/35
dalatindiva.bsky.socialDNC talks impeachment - but they didn't do it twice before
ONE legal pathway left
5/35
shanahstone.bsky.socialRemember the Central Park Five?
Trump is a horrible human being.
And everyone who joins shows who they are too.
6/35
libtee.bsky.socialIronic. He thinks he should be considered innocent even after proven guilty.
7/35
jhoward.bsky.social“if Trump tried to call *you* MS-13, how would you clear your name? you couldn’t. not if he wins this case”
8/35
vanillaredfox.bsky.socialYou’re forgetting that the Democratic Party are the blueprint for fukking up one car funerals. Embarrassing.
9/35
medlee.bsky.socialTrump doesn't care about guilt or innocence. He only cares about getting his way and punishing those that don't agree with his insanity.
10/35
tim-doin-tim-stuff.bsky.socialI'd go so far as to say he doesn't care if they are guilty or innocent at ALL
He cares about whether treating them as guilty, or declaring them innocent is of benefit to him
It's always about him
It's ONLY about him
11/35
rattacasal.bsky.socialHe's used our judicial system to his advantage his entire life. This is the same but on steroids.
12/35
kvett20.bsky.socialNah. He views himself as king. Full stop. Actual criminals that hurt, maime, break laws in his name, he pardons. Otherwise, if he can hurt someone to further his narrative he’ll do it. He’s an enemy of the republic.
13/35
zakaryalan.bsky.socialRemember when he told police officers that it was okay to beat up people they were arresting. Getting arrested isn't the same as being tried and found guilty. Lots of people are wrongly accused of crimes.
14/35
snowdenwriter.bsky.socialTrump does however believe in innocent after being proven guilty.
15/35
stlugal.bsky.socialNot true at all. He had no trouble defending Roy Moore, Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Brett Kavanaugh. So I suppose it depends on melanin and type of crime.
16/35
kablackquois.bsky.socialI think it’s also important to point out how much he dragged out his own due process. It all fits together. “…for my friends, everything.”
17/35
jmdevitt.bsky.socialHimself excepted of course—then, it’s ‘innocent *after* proven guilty.’
18/35
marcdoesbluesky.bsky.socialYou can be patriotic about it too: In America, people are innocent until proven guilty. In America, you don’t throw people in a jail because you don’t like what they say. In America, no one is above the law. I wish Dem leaders would frame it this way more.
19/35
pixiebithers.bsky.socialCentral Park 5 and a full page notice in The Times would be a precursor
precursor
20/35
calvinonthebeach.bsky.socialNo different from when he went after the Central Park 5, later known as the Exonerated 5. Would seem POC aren't entitled to due process in Trump World.
21/35
jeffreyd.bsky.socialno one says it because we're all kind of afraid that most Americans would say they don't either
22/35
gordonvincent.bsky.socialIt's about Putin's goal of rebuilding a Soviet Empire. That requires chaos in the west. To that end, he gives orders to the Rapist. The Rapist obeys, because he wants to live another day. He hasn't made a single decision on his own in ten years.
23/35
elidelajandro.bsky.socialUnless you're an elected Dem, because 98% of them have lost the ability to speak like a regular person.
24/35
austinred.bsky.socialThat’s for a criminal case, but due process is for any type of case…criminal, civil, administrative, family law, etc.
25/35
cmaguire3.bsky.socialIf trump had had his way, the 100% innocent Central Park Five would all have been executed for crimes they did not commit.
26/35
nocure4curiosity.bsky.socialClearly. He wanted to execute the Central Park teens even after they were found innocent.
27/35
metacogito.bsky.socialI dont think that phrasing carries the same self-evident import for the modern, what-about media-fried brain. But scooping up an innocent person who never has any chance whatsoever to explain their innocence before an irreversible punishment? That is a no-brainer.
28/35
kathleenwellman.bsky.socialOr, in his case, innocent when proven guilty!
29/35
phil-stone.bsky.socialFelontrump thinks they are all guilty, or stupid. And he considers himself smart.
30/35
wholegrains.bsky.socialAnd he believes he’s innocent even when proven guilty.
31/35
sfor4th.bsky.socialNo one’s having trouble communicating this. Except you - since you can’t remember to blame Republicans
32/35
gilliesracer.bsky.socialSadly, Trump believes he should be the only one to be considered innocent and never proven guilty.
33/35
callalily57.bsky.socialI've seen quite a few people respond that that only applies to citizens.
34/35
momchomsky.bsky.socialIt needs to be communicated that these people treat the Constitution as an impediment to their natural instincts.
bsky.app/profile/momc...
35/35
alissa914.bsky.socialTrump doesn't think he should have to prove anything he believes. If you try to say he's wrong, he threatens you until you let him get his way. He's not a hard person to figure out.... a lot of world leaders already manipulate him and he's unaware.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196
Commented on Sun Apr 27 11:56:52 2025 UTC
What is a nazi? A fascist that is a white supremist.
What is a fascist? It's an athoritarian that works with businesses.
What is an athoritarian? They use violence to control the population from the top down. Like a dictatorship.
So is trump a fascist and a white supremist? Mostly.
Is it fair to call him a nazi? Yes.
What is a nazi? A fascist that is a white supremist.
What is a fascist? It's an athoritarian that works with businesses.
What is an athoritarian? They use violence to control the population from the top down. Like a dictatorship.
So is trump a fascist and a white supremist? Mostly.
Is it fair to call him a nazi? Yes.
