so how are the dummies who can't see the bigger picture off the hook too???
I don't get it. Y'all see the problem. Y'all see that trying to scapegoat the photographer makes no sense.
But you still follow the crowd, instead of moving the crowd in the right direction.
You. Y'all. Make the story about one man. Not me.
Quick question: Do you think anybody on that platform that day will come forward and admit that they didn't help rescue dude? No. But public outrage for them is secondary to the NY Post creating the pic. That's a problem. That's THE problem. How do y'all allow their lack of action to create a SECONDARY response. That's lame.
First of all, please educate me on the "overall" problem.
The story should be about the one man because, to be honest, it is the most atrocious and inhumane thing I have seen in a while. The crowd is moving in the right direction, they are targeting the immoral actions of this ONE man. Yes, others did not help in the situation, wrongfully so, but focusing on this one man's action will definitely invoke a sense of humanity in people. I believe people, like us, will read this story and re-assess their actions and it might influence people to be more daring in future situations.
Yes, it is a long reach, but at least it is better to highlight the actions of this ONE man and learn from it then talk about the actions of others and let the story fade away like all the other ones do.
As you pointed out in your question, the other people on the platform were wrong in their actions. But they did not benefit from this financially, they did not take a picture of a man in a vulnerable position, and they definitely did not parade on TV and try to convince the general public that the camera was only used to signal the train driver. ARE YOU fukkIN SERIOUS?