evidence.What would constitue "proof"?
How you answer this question is going to expose some things.
evidence.What would constitue "proof"?
How you answer this question is going to expose some things.
evidence.
ev·i·denceWhat kind evidence? You need to establish what you mean by evidence.
I am not denying that God did and/or does not communicate with individuals through channeling. I am saying that man's interpretation of the divine and its true meaning are separate.
ev·i·dence
ˈevədəns/
noun
- 1.
the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
I did not ask you to define the meaning of the word "evidence". I asked you specifically to describe the kind of evidence that would be sufficient for you.
If you do not understand this simple question, then there's nothing to debate.
there is still chance join with Jesus Christ
in other words, you have none. Their are no various kinds of evidence, evidence is self explanatory.
Do you have any evidence?You've clearly never studied philosophy. "Evidence is self explanatory"
Let me walk you through this, breh. Are you requesting scientific evidence (which is one type of evidence)? :Mjwtf:
It's a universal message and the Core message regarding the nature of God is not different from the message of, say, Moses.
You might've practised a dry religion, but it was certainly not Islam. There's a vast spiritual tradition within Islam and this is something which is acknowledged even by Western academics. The writings of Al-Ghazali, Averroes (Ibn Rushd), Ibn Qayyim etc were studied even by Christian and Jewish scholars.
Is God incapable of insuring that the Truth be revealed and transmitted as He intended it to be understood?
Do you have any evidence?
I think you're having a hard time reading, I said ANY evidence.Yes, but what's sufficient for me might not be for you. Which is why we need to establish what you consider as sufficient evidence for the existence of God.
You're the one who needs evidence, so tell me what type of evidence you're requesting.
Is it scientific evidence? Stop dodging the question.
Following your own whims and desires is not "spiritual". It's delusion.
Thinking that the Divine did not send direct communications to humanity is ridiculous.
You just don't like the idea of having demands and expectations placed on you due to your own ego. You don't want to submit to the Divine, you want to do whatever makes you feel good. You're enslaved to your whims, breh.
Reflect on how ridiculous it would be if everyone followed their own sets of "spiritual beliefs".
In theory, my idea of being "spiritual" could be to lie, cheat and hurt other people. In the absence of universal truths, anything can be labeled "spiritual".
"God is one" is not some revolutionary contribution from Islam, or even the Abrahamic faiths in general.
There is nothing "spiritual" about Islam. It's nothing but empty rules, regulations, and threats of hellfire for unbelievers. How is that universal? Something so simple as MUSIC which is a common enjoyment for humanity in general is banned in Islam, what does that tell you? Again, it's a joyless faith.
A lot of converts to Islam fall for the okey doke, I was one of them. After extensive experience and study, I saw it for what it is. You don't have to be a Muslim to be devoted to one God.