They got Aziz Ansari

Matt504

YSL as a gang must end
Joined
Sep 7, 2013
Messages
45,219
Reputation
14,767
Daps
274,005
Feminist would have you believe that, but that's not true. Most encounters are consensual.


Again, this is unrealistic. It doesn't jive with how most sexual encounters go down. Most women find it to be turnoff when a guy asks permission to do things, only lames do that.

Don't allow feminists to distort your reality. It's very easy to tell if someone you're kissing isn't kissing you back. As you go further, you need only pause for a second, or back up to see if she will pull you closer.



This is bullshyt breh. As creepy as Aziz was, you think a "no" wouldn't have stopped him? When she finally did take action (declaring she was going to leave), did he try to physically stop her? Of course not. No means nothing to a rapist, which is why they get charged with rape when they ignore it.

"most women" "most sexual encounters"
 

J-Fire

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,701
Reputation
-1,375
Daps
7,681
Reppin
NULL
You aren't forced to trust women. :heh:

Why would you trust someone that you don't know? And since you are straight up penetrating someone...if you're unsure...just ask. It sounds lame but 1) better safe than sorry and 2) most dudes with game or common sense will have the woman asking (or begging, if done right) for the situation to escalate.

Believe me, if a woman wants have any kind of intercourse she is gonna go for it and likely be pretty forceful about it, too. Like, have you ever tried to a reject a woman's advances. They have a hard time taking no for an answer. They can't believe it.

And you don't have to prove consent...if consent was given. :leostare:



what they hell are you even saying?!?! She could say yes for a number of reason and comeback saying she was on drugs and didn't fully understand what was going down and felt taken advantage of the next day.

there is no way to prove consent.Now lack of consent includes power dynamic like it's statutory rape even to women claiming a power dynamic in a guy being a male...which is beyond being her boss, her being afraid to say no, somehow she was on drugs and I should have had her piss in a cup to realize she was under the influence.

It's turning into children playing adult out here.
 

J-Fire

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,701
Reputation
-1,375
Daps
7,681
Reppin
NULL
and people wonder why celebs and rich people pay for p*ssy. Lisa Ann isn't kissing, giving head, then denying sex, shes coming over to fukk and leave.


implied consent with her taking cash on the night stand. And as long as you ain't forcing her to do an act she doesn't want to do...you good.

However, she has the power to expose you if you mess-up unlike other women cause there is a paper trail of you using her services so she's in a more powerful position compared to most women.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
27,730
Reputation
4,661
Daps
103,102
I'm not speaking from research or feminist observation, bro. I'm speaking for personal experience. I've been around the block and plenty of times. And I will say that only once has a woman stopped intercourse because I was talking.

I mean we can chop up the hypotheticals all day. But the truth is, in an era where women can "take back" consent the next day and all this other gray area type shyt...the rules are simple, imo. I get it if you disagree. 1)All sex can be considered rape if consent can be rescinded after the fact. 2) Only response that matters is "Yes".

I don't think most would agree it's acceptable to take back consent the next day (if it could be proven that that's what actuallyhappened), but you're indirectly highlighting a reason why women need to still be taught to verbalize their "no": consent can absolutely be rescinded whilst the act is underway.

So even if a chick explicitly states "yes, let's have sex" and they start the process she can decide five minutes later that she no longer wants to do it, and the guy has to stop. If he continues that's rape. With your policy of not requiring grown ass adult woman you verbalize a "no" is that if they're in the midst of the act and she no longer wants to do is the guy is just supposed to pick up on it and stop. She can just claim she tightened up and count the number of times she pulled her hand away from his dikk.

Nah fukk all that, there's a simple solution here: say "no". And guys remember, "no means no".
 

Jasonmask

Superstar
Joined
Oct 30, 2017
Messages
8,820
Reputation
1,253
Daps
24,364
Story faulty af. She got salty because this nikka was taking charge like a man and serving white wine and she complained saying she drinks red. I’m going to chop it up as her being young. Women 25+ know what the deal is we all grown and if you feeling somebody y’all have sex it’s not a big deal no one is feeling rushed because the feeling is mutual and that’s it.
 

Da King

Veteran
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
62,021
Reputation
1,127
Daps
209,260
thot in question
F7m3Whqc_400x400.jpg

Hipster bytch that lives in Brooklyn, fits the profile of a #metoo scammer

Definition of a basic cac bytch, I’ll see 50 carbon copies of her on the way to the coffee shop here in Fort Greene
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2014
Messages
7,508
Reputation
1,691
Daps
18,381
what they hell are you even saying?!?! She could say yes for a number of reason and comeback saying she was on drugs and didn't fully understand what was going down and felt taken advantage of the next day.

there is no way to prove consent.Now lack of consent includes power dynamic like it's statutory rape even to women claiming a power dynamic in a guy being a male...which is beyond being her boss, her being afraid to say no, somehow she was on drugs and I should have had her piss in a cup to realize she was under the influence.

It's turning into children playing adult out here.
I'm keeping it simple. Protect yourself. If you don't know for sure, don't do it.

I don't think most would agree it's acceptable to take back consent the next day (if it could be proven that that's what actuallyhappened), but you're indirectly highlighting a reason why women need to still be taught to verbalize their "no": consent can absolutely be rescinded whilst the act is underway.

So even if a chick explicitly states "yes, let's have sex" and they start the process she can decide five minutes later that she no longer wants to do it, and the guy has to stop. If he continues that's rape. With your policy of not requiring grown ass adult woman you verbalize a "no" is that if they're in the midst of the act and she no longer wants to do is the guy is just supposed to pick up on it and stop. She can just claim she tightened up and count the number of times she pulled her hand away from his dikk.

Nah fukk all that, there's a simple solution here: say "no". And guys remember, "no means no".
Yeah, I agree no means no but that's a lesson that women need to teach each other. It has nothing to do with me.

I'm just playing it safe. Just because she didn't say no, doesn't mean she's consenting.

If you commit a crime with one witness, are you innocent because they don't call the cops?

I don't care what women "should" do, or anyone for that matter. If I don't have the OK, I'm stopping. I'd rather be the "lame" seeking verbal reinforcement than the lame begging for head that lands my ass in court.
 

Guile

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 6, 2013
Messages
16,525
Reputation
1,048
Daps
49,773
"After arriving at his apartment in Manhattan on Monday evening, they exchanged small talk and drank wine. “It was white,” she said. “I didn’t get to choose and I prefer red, but it was white wine.” Then Ansari walked her to Grand Banks, an Oyster bar onboard a historic wooden schooner on the Hudson River just a few blocks away."

I'm sorry but this tidbit made me dislike the chick.
 

J-Fire

Banned
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
6,701
Reputation
-1,375
Daps
7,681
Reppin
NULL
I don't think most would agree it's acceptable to take back consent the next day (if it could be proven that that's what actuallyhappened), but you're indirectly highlighting a reason why women need to still be taught to verbalize their "no": consent can absolutely be rescinded whilst the act is underway.

So even if a chick explicitly states "yes, let's have sex" and they start the process she can decide five minutes later that she no longer wants to do it, and the guy has to stop. If he continues that's rape. With your policy of not requiring grown ass adult woman you verbalize a "no" is that if they're in the midst of the act and she no longer wants to do is the guy is just supposed to pick up on it and stop. She can just claim she tightened up and count the number of times she pulled her hand away from his dikk.

Nah fukk all that, there's a simple solution here: say "no". And guys remember, "no means no".



how can consent be proven either way? outside of a rape kit and video evidence in the traditional sense it's some murky waters.

what's stopping a guy from saying he didn't hear no to a sex act and she submitted out of fear. it's some messy sh!t, but now we merking dudes on she said....why can't it be believed a guy is innocent until proven guilty. But we just going on the feelings/words of a lady without hardcore facts like the forceful rapist.




I deal in facts and this she/he said mess is crazy. I want to see the video tape of his home cameras.
 
Top