Feminist would have you believe that, but that's not true. Most encounters are consensual.
Again, this is unrealistic. It doesn't jive with how most sexual encounters go down. Most women find it to be turnoff when a guy asks permission to do things, only lames do that.
Don't allow feminists to distort your reality. It's very easy to tell if someone you're kissing isn't kissing you back. As you go further, you need only pause for a second, or back up to see if she will pull you closer.
This is bullshyt breh. As creepy as Aziz was, you think a "no" wouldn't have stopped him? When she finally did take action (declaring she was going to leave), did he try to physically stop her? Of course not. No means nothing to a rapist, which is why they get charged with rape when they ignore it.
You aren't forced to trust women.
Why would you trust someone that you don't know? And since you are straight up penetrating someone...if you're unsure...just ask. It sounds lame but 1) better safe than sorry and 2) most dudes with game or common sense will have the woman asking (or begging, if done right) for the situation to escalate.
Believe me, if a woman wants have any kind of intercourse she is gonna go for it and likely be pretty forceful about it, too. Like, have you ever tried to a reject a woman's advances. They have a hard time taking no for an answer. They can't believe it.
And you don't have to prove consent...if consent was given.
and people wonder why celebs and rich people pay for p*ssy. Lisa Ann isn't kissing, giving head, then denying sex, shes coming over to fukk and leave.
I'm not speaking from research or feminist observation, bro. I'm speaking for personal experience. I've been around the block and plenty of times. And I will say that only once has a woman stopped intercourse because I was talking.
I mean we can chop up the hypotheticals all day. But the truth is, in an era where women can "take back" consent the next day and all this other gray area type shyt...the rules are simple, imo. I get it if you disagree. 1)All sex can be considered rape if consent can be rescinded after the fact. 2) Only response that matters is "Yes".
Truthand people wonder why celebs and rich people pay for p*ssy. Lisa Ann isn't kissing, giving head, then denying sex, shes coming over to fukk and leave.
Problem is, now THEY are talkingand people wonder why celebs and rich people pay for p*ssy. Lisa Ann isn't kissing, giving head, then denying sex, shes coming over to fukk and leave.
thot in question
Hipster bytch that lives in Brooklyn, fits the profile of a #metoo scammer
Problem is, now THEY are talking
I'm keeping it simple. Protect yourself. If you don't know for sure, don't do it.what they hell are you even saying?!?! She could say yes for a number of reason and comeback saying she was on drugs and didn't fully understand what was going down and felt taken advantage of the next day.
there is no way to prove consent.Now lack of consent includes power dynamic like it's statutory rape even to women claiming a power dynamic in a guy being a male...which is beyond being her boss, her being afraid to say no, somehow she was on drugs and I should have had her piss in a cup to realize she was under the influence.
It's turning into children playing adult out here.
Yeah, I agree no means no but that's a lesson that women need to teach each other. It has nothing to do with me.I don't think most would agree it's acceptable to take back consent the next day (if it could be proven that that's what actuallyhappened), but you're indirectly highlighting a reason why women need to still be taught to verbalize their "no": consent can absolutely be rescinded whilst the act is underway.
So even if a chick explicitly states "yes, let's have sex" and they start the process she can decide five minutes later that she no longer wants to do it, and the guy has to stop. If he continues that's rape. With your policy of not requiring grown ass adult woman you verbalize a "no" is that if they're in the midst of the act and she no longer wants to do is the guy is just supposed to pick up on it and stop. She can just claim she tightened up and count the number of times she pulled her hand away from his dikk.
Nah fukk all that, there's a simple solution here: say "no". And guys remember, "no means no".
I don't think most would agree it's acceptable to take back consent the next day (if it could be proven that that's what actuallyhappened), but you're indirectly highlighting a reason why women need to still be taught to verbalize their "no": consent can absolutely be rescinded whilst the act is underway.
So even if a chick explicitly states "yes, let's have sex" and they start the process she can decide five minutes later that she no longer wants to do it, and the guy has to stop. If he continues that's rape. With your policy of not requiring grown ass adult woman you verbalize a "no" is that if they're in the midst of the act and she no longer wants to do is the guy is just supposed to pick up on it and stop. She can just claim she tightened up and count the number of times she pulled her hand away from his dikk.
Nah fukk all that, there's a simple solution here: say "no". And guys remember, "no means no".