its cool we can agree to disagree.
Your reference to the negative in Hip Hop being the fault of the individuals...This is true. But when there is a collective doing it and no there isn't a major voice speaking against it it becomes unaccountablity. Its like you see it but u ignore it. This why I can acknowledge Chuck D because that lil situation he has with Rosenberg is based on exactly what Chuck is supposed to be doing, accountability. But Chucks voice is small in a sea of wrecklessness. Yes drugs and violence existed before Hip Hop.....But then came The Stop Teh Violence Movement and "Self Sestruction" and "We're All In The Same Gang" and "Human Education Against Lies" to go from that to the having over 2 decades of glorifying selling dope...That has to be called out. Yet there isn't a major voice amongst the so called culture calling it out or putting it in check. 2 decades of drug selling glorification? Come on man. There has to be accountablity. U spoke about the voices that are against the negativity but again those voices are drowned out by the majority. I dont blame Hip Hop for drugs or violence..I'm just calling it out for its unaccountability. U see when there is no accountability for the wrecklessness then to align it with the defintion of "culture" means that we are saying that this unaccountable wrecklessness thats a major factor in the so called culture is OK. Thats unacceptable BUT... wrecklessness is ok if its put in its proper place by acknowledging it as "entertainment"......As "entertainment" wrecklessness gets a pass all day. You can talk about killing people and selling dope all in the name of entertainment and it actually makes sense because its seperates reality from fantasy. But to have unaccoutable dope dealing and violence as the norm and say its part of a "culture" that falls in the category of ignorance. No sane conscious person would put unaccounted wrecklessness within the lines of a "culture" and just accept it as so. Thats not a culture i would want to be a part of....Thats why i have preserved Hip Hop by putting it in the category of "entertainment" because as long as the wrecklessness has the major voice I can only look at it as entertainment.
What about someone like Nas? For what him and Damien Marley did on Distant Relatives? That was a pretty positive album and are pretty big artists. I'm not saying there shouldn't be accountability, there should be to everyone for anything, but I don't see why to throw the whole of Hip Hop under the bus. I don't see Chuck as a small voice, when Chuck talks I listen, same with KRS and others. Some people are talking about their lives and I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong with that, even someone like Jay Z said he hopes others don't do it, but I don't think they should be denied speaking on their life. There's 100's of voices in Hip Hop calling these things out though, from Will Smith to Immortal Technique to Buckshot and so many more. All those voices together make an impact. I don't think recklessness is ok if you put it into an entertainment category because everything has an effect and influence. Hip Hop is a mixture of entertainment and culture, there's songs and artists that are more entertainment and some that are more culture.