"A lot of people think they know physics because they spent an hour on the internet."
I wonder if thecrowd will call Chomsky an agent of the MSM globalist, Zionist agenda.
He said he has no opinion because he's not a physicist or a structural engineer, so he's not going to try and debate the minutia of what happened in WTC 7. If you watch the whole video, he makes a well-reasoned case as to why he thinks the conspiracy claims are bogus, saying that if there were any merit to the conspiracy claims, they would be published and peer-reviewed by the physics and engineering community, and how easy it would be for these conspiracy theorists to bring their claims and data to the scientific community for analysis instead of the tinfoil hat n' pajamas youtube scholar community.
I'd say him having one of the highest IQs of any living human being and being the world's most cited author gives him a good deal of credibility.
I wouldn't call that a con really. At the end of the day, no one can deconstruct any arguments he puts out. All they can say is how they don't like the delivery. This always happens when it comes to anyone who can debate well. When people have nothing to say they will attack the messenger instead of the merits of the argument.
His intelligence and knowledge of peer review, jounalism, publication, and that whole process and the academic rigor that goes with it allow him to make the well-reasoned assessment he made.
would the alleged conspirators gain by blowing up a 3rd smaller building the average person doesn't even know about? It wouldn't help with whatever nefarious motive they had. All it would do is raise a red flag and draw suspicion to the plot.haaaaahaaaa please find a link to that I would die laughing at that shytHe said he has no opinion because he's not a physicist or a structural engineer, so he's not going to try and debate the minutia of what happened in WTC 7. If you watch the whole video, he makes a well-reasoned case as to why he thinks the conspiracy claims are bogus, saying that if there were any merit to the conspiracy claims, they would be published and peer-reviewed by the physics and engineering community, and how easy it would be for these conspiracy theorists to bring their claims and data to the scientific community for analysis instead of the tinfoil hat n' pajamas youtube scholar community.
It's funny how Chomsky always says "I have no opinion on that" whenever somebody comes at him with bullshyt lol. I guess that's his way of being polite. I remember I was watching him on C-SPAN taking calls once and it was like every goofy ass HLcalled in with their pet conspiracy/new age/pseudoscience topic question. I guess he attracts those types because his views are so outside of the mainstream. Caller after caller kept rambling about 9/11and banking conspiracies and even more off the wall shyt...one lady asked him some question about "goddess power," whatever that is and Gaia. He just kept repeating "I have no opinion on that" over and over on those types of callers.
Those temps were taking days later. I've read the nist report and its a crock of shyt. what it implies actually goes against physics. but nevermind that. i didn't mean to interupt your circle jerk.Temperatures were not high enough to melt steel. Steel melts at 2500+ degrees F. The highest recorded temperatures at Ground Zero were barely above 1500 degrees F.
Don't read NIST reports that have been on-line for several years, brehs.
Believe Super Science Ninjas infiltrated the WTC and planted tons of explosives without anyone noticing and all traces of said explosives disappeared, brehs.
Ill Clinton said:
