Yet he's saying the same stuff as people like me who post here. Why do you think that is?
false.
again, chomsky doesn't have an opinion on it.
you on the other hand believe the government's story on 9/11 and dont even question it.
fail again
Yet he's saying the same stuff as people like me who post here. Why do you think that is?
i guess on everyone elses screen this post doesn't show up? Cause that whole. "It shouldn't have collapsed like it did" crap is pretty much deaded right here.
Did you watch the fukking video?!?false.
again, chomsky doesn't have an opinion on it.
you on the other hand believe the government's story on 9/11 and dont even question it.
fail again
I was probably reading Chomsky when you were still reading coloring books.Question should be why does the OP care so much about Chomsky's opinion on 9/11 when the OP has never used Noam's opinion on anything else?
Ebonic Plague said:Idk what happened its just a strange thing or we making it more than it is. In my own common sense thinking it seems the building shouldn't have came down but I'm no expert so I can be so far wrong just like everyone else. But it seems fishy. Always has since it happened. So that counts for something.
If you are familiar with Chomsky's diction, he says "I don't have an opinion" every time someone presents him with a claim he sees as nonsensical. He's been doing that for years. He made it abundantly clear in the vid he finds truther claims to be bullshyt.
Ill Clinton said:If building 7 came down because of burning furniture then we would have skyscrapers collapsing all the time.
Ill Clinton said:
We have thermal images that show temperatures at ground zero that far exceed anything burning furnishings can produce. that's physical proof something is wrong.
11.3.2. At what temperature does a typical fire burn?
The duration and the maximum temperature of a fire in a building compartment depends on several factors including the amount and configuration of available combustibles, ventilation conditions, properties of the compartment enclosure, weather conditions, etc. In common circumstances, the maximum temperature of a fully developed building fire will rarely exceed 1800°F. The average gas temperature in a fully developed fire is not likely to reach 1500°F. Temperatures of fires that have not developed to post-flashover stage will not exceed 1000°F.
In response to requests from the Environmental Protection Agency, through the US Geological Survey, NASA flies a plane over the site of the WTC complex, equipped with a remote sensing instrument called AVIRIS. AVIRIS is able to remotely record the near-infrared signature of heat. Analysis of the data it collects indicates temperatures at Ground Zero of above 800 degrees Fahrenheit, with some areas above 1,300 degrees. On September 16, dozens of “hot spots” are seen, but by September 23, only four or five remain.
Did you read the NIST report or just skim through it?If building 7 came down because of burning furniture then we would have skyscrapers collapsing all the time. I like Noam but I don't agree with this.
We have thermal images that show temperatures at ground zero that far exceed anything burning furnishings can produce. that's physical proof something is wrong.
Mephistopheles said:Did you read the NIST report or just skim through it?
Cherry-picking is more a deliberate act of deception than a logical fallacy, but nevertheless an extremely common tactic.
Cherry-picking happens when someone deliberately selects from a wide variety of material only those items which support the conspiracy theory, while ignoring and discarding those which don't. When this carefully chosen selection of material is then presented as a whole, it easily misleads people into thinking that the conspiracy theory is supported by evidence.
This is an especially popular tactic for the 9/11 conspiracy theorists: They will only choose those published photographs which support their claims, while outright ignoring those which don't. The Loose Change "documentary" is quite infamous for doing this, and pulling it out rather convincingly.
The major problem with this is, of course, that it's pure deception: The viewer is intentionally given only carefully selected material, while leaving out the parts which would contradict the conspiracy theory. This is a deliberate act. The conspiracy theorists cannot claim honesty while doing clear cherry-picking.
Just ignore the fact that part of the building had already been destroyed by falling debris and the fire was uncontrolled for several hours which also contributed to it's collapse, brehs.
Wrong. The temperatures at those 'hot spots' are normal:
http://www.aisc.org/DynamicTaxonomyFAQs.aspx?id=1996
Ill Clinton said:believe office fires can melt steel brehs.
Metals lose about 50% of their strength at 60% of their melting temperature. This is common knowledge and may be found in any undergraduate text regarding "Fracture and Deformation of Materials."
No steel was melted......
Ill Clinton said:many clean up workers reported seeing molten steel at ground zero weeks after 9/11. try again