The UFO/UAP disclosure thread

[Professor Emeritus]

It looks quite likely to be a lens effect, and on top of that the whole idea that an otherwise magical UFO would have blinking lights is kinda goofy.

 

[Leavingtheecstasy]

This shyt is really going to happen. I was never a big fan of the idea of aliens are really here or have found us.

But the govt is literally coming out and telling us this shyt is not ours...... like wtf is about to happen?????

 

[KillerB88]

How the Pentagon Started Taking U.F.O.s Seriously

 

[Geek Nasty]

I can't rememeber where I saw a dude say this, but we've got hi-def cameras and somehow all the UFO footage is still blurry

 

[Professor Emeritus]

I can't rememeber where I saw a dude say this, but we've got hi-def cameras and somehow all the UFO footage is still blurry

I said it this weekend, but I'm sure others have said it too.

Because literally any instance that gets a more detailed video, it becomes OBVIOUS that it's regular-ass shyt and so it becomes a non-event immediately.

When you believe in something that only works with shytty video, you have to start questioning why your event never happens to occur when anyone has a better video around.

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

What I don't understand is how military with all their advanced equipment can't tell if its a balloon or a lens reflection etc.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

What I don't understand is how military with all their advanced equipment can't tell if its a balloon or a lens reflection etc.

In some cases they likely can tell, but aren't disclosing because it would reveal specs and/or limitations of their sensory equipment that they wish to remain classified.

In other cases the original equipment recording was just so shytty (like coming from a pilot's mobile phone) that there just isn't a lot of information there, they can make an educated guess but choose not to say anything definitive.

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

In some cases they likely can tell, but aren't disclosing because it would reveal specs and/or limitations of their sensory equipment that they wish to remain classified.

In other cases the original equipment recording was just so shytty (like coming from a pilot's mobile phone) that there just isn't a lot of information there, they can make an educated guess but choose not to say anything definitive.

Word. I have never believed in UFOs in the mainstream sense of alien craft. There's always an explanation and extraterrestrial ships is not it.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

Word. I have never believed in UFOs in the mainstream sense of alien craft. There's always an explanation and extraterrestrial ships is not it.

I used to be a big-time believer but as I've gotten older it's looked less and less likely.

 

[Poetical Poltergeist]

I used to be a big-time believer but as I've gotten older it's looked less and less likely.

It's like Big Foot and Loch ness, aint ever been any proof. No big foot bones have ever been found. Just like no space craft has ever been found, just lights and theories. If the government has found an alien spacecraft it would never be released to the public.

 

[Hawaiian Punch]

I think one of the big issues is people are so quick to identify unidentified phenomena. People are quick to be like “yeah it’s alien spacecraft”, but the reality is you are making an identification and coming up with quick conclusions. It’s call “unidentified” for a reason

The fact is phenomena of unknown origin has made incursions into restricted air spaces and display flight characteristics that defy conventional physics. It’s been picked up by radar, sonar and confirmed by multiple witnesses. Historically it’s had a congruence near nuclear facilities and commercial aircraft. It’s resulted in electro optical disturbances on aircraft, including disrupting radio broadcasts, power outages, screwing up compasses and at time disabling nuclear warheads. It has appeared as saucer shaped, Illuminous orbs and triangles to name a few. This has been documented worldwide, with famous incidents in Tehran and France. Also the image below is one of the clearest images of one of the craft from a Costa Rican mapping survey.

people want to put this in a neat little box but it’s not that simple. It could be meteorological, advanced tech by another country or something else we don’t know. That needs to studied. All the other stuff just muddies that waters.

 

[ADevilYouKhow]

Probe Into Handling Of UFO Encounters Launched By Pentagon's Inspector General

@Rhakim

 

[Jahbarri]

We got satellites that can read license plate numbers off cars but we still getting grainy photos of ufo? Foh

UFO imagery we see or obtain aren’t from Satellites , they’re from phones that’s why

 

[Leavingtheecstasy]

In some cases they likely can tell, but aren't disclosing because it would reveal specs and/or limitations of their sensory equipment that they wish to remain classified.

In other cases the original equipment recording was just so shytty (like coming from a pilot's mobile phone) that there just isn't a lot of information there, they can make an educated guess but choose not to say anything definitive.

From what I've been hearing the leaked videos are the absolute shyttiest, least compelling evidence they have.


They apparently have far clearer videos stored away including one where a UFO was only 50 feet away. That is the one that would change everything imo

 

[Agent Mulder]

New footage of UFO submerging into water.